Google Cloud Storage Reviews

We use it mostly for document storage and rarely for document sharing. 

It allows us to store documents when our internal data storage is insufficient. 

The best feature is the ease of use. You don't have to be savvy or learn about it in advance to use it. 

It could be made even more secure and allow for more storage. 

We have been using it two to three years. 

The solution is stable and fast with reliable internet connection. 

I haven't had any problems, so haven't had a need to contact them. 

We used internal storage but space was limited. 

We really didn't even need to learn using the videos, it is very easy to use. 

I'd rate it a nine because of ease of use. 

Our primary use case for Google Cloud Storage is for backup storage in the cloud, just in case our on-premises server fails. We do not use it as a primary storage solution but for backup purposes.

We have found our user experience to be excellent when it comes to storage. Google Cloud Storage meets our needs and requirements, without any disruptions.

Google Cloud Storage has proven most valuable for our data management needs due to its bandwidth speed for backing up and restoring data. In terms of storage, our user experience has been excellent. We do not experience any disruptions, and the service meets our needs and requirements.

So far, when it comes to security, it meets our needs and requirements, so I have nothing to say about improvements to their services. I do not find any areas needing improvement currently.

So far, it's been more than a year now. We have been fully using the services from Google Cloud.

We have not experienced any disruptions, so I could rate the stability as ten out of ten.

The rating for scalability ranges from eight to nine out of ten, reflecting high scalability for our needs.

Here in the Philippines, we don't have direct support from Google. We have self-studied to learn the services.

Positive

In my other company, we used Microsoft. Since 2021, we have been using Google.

The initial setup was straightforward. We use the service for backup storage only, and there is no complexity involved.

We do it ourselves in-house, without needing a third party.

Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability. We use it for backup, so the storage that is not used often is affordable.

I would recommend Google Cloud Storage based on our experience, as it is fully reliable. I rate the overall solution ten out of ten.

We primarily use Google Cloud Storage for storage and as a platform integrated with Google Suite. Extending storage to the cloud is beneficial for additional activities that the company or client may require.

By using cloud services, we have ensured compliance in terms of data protection, which is better than using on-premises solutions. However, many small to medium enterprises (SMEs) in the Philippines find it challenging in terms of cost, which impacts the decision to move to the cloud.

Google Cloud Storage integrates well with Google Suite, making it easy to extend functionalities to cloud-based platforms for various company activities. The scalability model is robust, allowing additional capacity without issue.

The initial setup appears to be the hardest part, although once familiar with it, the process becomes easier. Pricing remains challenging, especially for SMEs, making cloud services costlier than on-premises solutions.

I've been familiar with Google Cloud Storage since around 2020. Before that, I was using Microsoft-based cloud solutions.

Google Cloud Storage provides a good scalable model, making it easy to add capacity as needed without problems.

I cannot comment on Google's technical support for Google Cloud Storage as I don't have a point of comparison with other providers.

Neutral

In my previous company, we used ERP Storage solutions, however, currently, I am not handling any ERP software.

The initial setup takes about one to two hours with my understanding of the process. However, others I've talked to have taken one to two days to set up what they wanted to do with cloud solutions.

The pricing for cloud services, including Google, remains challenging in the Philippines, especially for SMEs. These businesses often find cloud solutions more expensive compared to on-premises options.

I would recommend Google Cloud Storage for companies that do not want to manage on-premises infrastructure. For small and medium enterprises, the cost may be a limiting factor, so it may not be as feasible for them.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

The solution helps us to store and retrieve information from AI, specifically Gemini AI, and to build Google Sheets for presentations. It's a central hub for all our documents, allowing us to store, share, and collaborate without sending attachments.

The solution offers versioning, which lets us work together efficiently on a single document. What I like most about Google Cloud Storage is its ease of use and the integration of all Google services. It's very efficient for work.

Everything is securely protected, and we use USB keys to ensure that no one can access the cloud without authorization. Privacy is a big concern for us, and Google Cloud Storage allows for very granular privacy settings.

Sometimes, I'm not too fond of privacy policies, especially when using certain features like Gemini AI, where agreeing to the terms might mean losing access to your history. One area for improvement is document retrieval—sometimes, it's hard to find documents because the file names aren't always recognizable, and the preview feature could be more efficient. Maintenance for Google Cloud Storage is minimal, but it would be helpful to have a tool that automatically removes duplicate versions of files to save space. The file management in Google Cloud and Workspace isn't very straightforward, which could be improved.

Regarding AI integration, I'm generally satisfied with how AI is integrated into Google Cloud Storage. It works well for retrieving documents from Google Drive. However, it doesn't handle images as effectively. I find the separation between Google Photos and Google Drive inconvenient. It would be much more efficient if I could retrieve both images and text documents together through AI rather than having to access them separately.

I have been working with the product for more than five years. 

For stability, I would also rate it a ten—it’s perfect.

I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten. It's very scalable, and if you reach your storage limit, you can easily upgrade to a higher plan or even move to a corporate level if needed. We're a small company aiming to stay small but efficient and we currently have nine partners using the same base to share information.

I had some issues with the Gemini AI in the past month, where it wasn't performing well, and when I reached out to support, their responses were not very helpful. They didn’t address my specific questions and provided very general answers. I would have preferred more direct contact, like a phone or video call, rather than just email. 

Neutral

Regarding competitors, I’ve tried Microsoft’s cloud storage, but I prefer Google Cloud Storage because they are more innovative in some areas. While I still use Microsoft’s desktop software, such as Word and Excel, Google Workspace offers similar apps, and switching between the two isn't difficult. The learning curve is minimal. 

The setup is straightforward, taking just a few minutes to a few hours, depending on the application.

Regarding return on investment, I've seen significant time savings, which is crucial for my work. The efficiency of Google Cloud Storage means I don't have to spend much time managing documents or creating them, which saves me time. However, there are areas where improvements could be made, especially on the backend of Gmail.

I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. 

My company had to deal with two to three projects using Google Cloud Storage. My company operates as an agency and a software house. We work for multiple projects of multiple clients as an agency in server keys for multiple clients. Different clients have different requirements, so my company uses multiple platforms.

Currently, we are not working too much on Google Cloud Storage, so we are not talking too much about what needs improvement in the solution. As per what your company's client wanted, we had only three deployments associated with Google Cloud Storage.

The price of Azure products is high. In my opinion, the prices of Google solutions should be lowered for businesses.

I have experience with Google Cloud Storage. My company works for the clients who use Google Cloud Storage. If customers want Azure, we provide it. If the customers want Amazon, we provide Amazon. If our customers prefer Google, then we offer it to them. Most of our customers approach our company for deployment. My company operates as an implementer.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. It is a reliable product.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Currently, my company has only dealt with three requirements associated with the tool. Our deployments are mostly on Azure. Our company's clients suggest that they want Google Cloud Storage deployed on their applications.

I am satisfied with the technical support team for the solution. The support engineer's response time is slow. I rate the technical support a six out of ten.

Neutral

The initial setup phase can be difficult for a business student working for the first time in Google Cloud Storage.

The solution is deployed on a public cloud.

The solution can be deployed in four to five hours.

Currently, the tool does not offer cost-saving benefits. Compared to Azure, Google Cloud Storage does not help with cost savings.

If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a nine to ten out of ten.

Google Cloud Storage's support is not fully available on YouTube or through Google itself, especially compared to tools from Azure. If you have any queries or problems, you can use Google to find solutions related to products from Google, Azure, and Amazon. In Google Cloud Storage, some decisions are difficult for a user, especially for those who are not familiar with the current scenario.

The tool's multi-regional storage options have been beneficial for operations since my company works on the cloud depending on the requirements of our clients. For a client who, on a regional basis, is hosting an app with the help of APIs, we provide all of our mechanisms and business models depending on the client's requirements.

Currently, my company has not integrated any services in Google Cloud Storage.

Currently, Google Cloud Storage is not easy for any user. That is why the users are suffering with the platform. Anytime I compare Google Cloud to Azure. Azure platform is complicated, but it is available on Google Cloud. When it comes to Google Cloud, the solution's support is not easy to handle for any new user. As an experienced person who is working on Google Cloud, I know things can be okay. As a new user of Google Cloud, one may face a little bit of difficulty.

I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

I use Google Cloud Storage for backup and storage of my data.

Google Cloud Storage's most valuable features are that it's easy to use and navigate, and it's not expensive.

An area for improvement is that when you share with others, they can see all your folders instead of just those you share. Only the folders you specifically share should be visible.

I've been using Google Cloud Storage for over ten years.

Google Cloud Storage is a stable product.

Google Cloud Storage's scalability is very good.

I would recommend Google Cloud Storage as a secure, inexpensive, and user-friendly backup solution. I would give it a rating of nine out of ten.

My primary use case of this solution is file storage. You can store almost everything in there—files of all formats—and the storage capacity is pretty good. I believe the drive capacity is 15GB or so. This is a cloud-based solution, so you're always using the latest version. 

Some of the most valuable features are how convenient and easy to use this solution is. It's very user-friendly and meets all my requirements. 

Google Cloud Storage could be improved by increasing the drive capacity. 

I have been using this solution for many years now. 

This solution is stable. 

This solution is scalable. The drive could have more capacity. There is easily a minimum of around 70% to 75% of users in my organization who use this Google Cloud Storage. 

I have never contacted technical support, but I know friends who have. My friends gave me very positive feedback about getting immediate support. I've heard Google's support is very good. 

I have used Dropbox too, but I usually prefer Google Cloud Storage. When I started using Google Cloud Storage, it was easy to use and met all my requirements, so I haven't switched back since. 

Since this is a cloud-based solution, installation is pretty straightforward.

I implemented this solution myself. 

I use the free version and have never paid for any extra storage. I have been able to manage in whatever free spaces are given. 

I rate this solution a 9.5 to 10 out of 10. 

Primarily, I use the solution for all my documentation. Prior to this, I'd normally work three or four years in one company and take up an assignment, make things work there, and move out. All related documents I might share with someone physically. Now, all my documents are on the cloud and more easily accessible. 

It's simple to use. 

There's no implementation process.

I don't find the solution very user-friendly.

I've been using the solution for ten years now. 

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. it's reliable. 

For my personal needs, it's okay in terms of scalability. I don't see any challenges, however, I don't know how it would be for the commercial user.

We have about 150 people in the company using it. It used to be 400. We're actually using it less. 

We've never required technical support. 

Personally, I used Rackspace, I think five, six years back, which I found it much easier to use, much simpler, and much easier to use.

I'm using the product for my personal needs. In terms of Rackspace, I used to work for a development company, and there I used it for another client. The good part was that whenever I wanted to deploy the whole application, I got good technical support from them. In fact, their team in Hong Kong or Singapore, where they have a data center, that team had a lot of interaction with me on the deployment architecture. They finally suggested the whole solution, how it should be deployed, and how it could be scaled up and scaled down as the need arises. 

The solution does come as part of a bundle. 

There isn't a setup process. It's very easy to start using it. It's all in the cloud, ready to go. 

I'd recommend the solution to others.

I would rate it ten out of ten. If it was more intuitive, it would be even better.