Intercept X Endpoint Reviews

We use the solution for antivirus threat detection and response.

The solution's most valuable feature is threat protection.

The solution's pricing could be better.

We have been using the solution for four years.

It is a stable solution. I rate its stability as a ten.

We have 1400 solution users in our organization. It is very scalable, and I rate its scalability a ten.

The solution's customer service is helpful.

Positive

We used ESET before. Later, we switched to Sophos for better features.

The solution gets maintained automatically.

I recommend the solution to others and rate it as a nine.

The solution is primarily used for endpoint. 

The client isolation feature is a very effective feature. There is a lot of information you can find in the console. Management is good. They're always giving you information on the products you have rather than trying to send you new products.

I have been using Intercept X Endpoint for 3 months. 

The solution is stable and I rate the stability an 8 out of 10. 

I have only spoken to technical support during installation. 

When talking to sales support or technical people, I find that they're all very busy. It takes a few days to be able to actually have a meeting arranged. If I contact them that I want to have a meeting with somebody technical from Sophos to go over an implementation or something that I wanted to get out of the product, they may not be available for 6 or 7 days.

Neutral

The initial setup is straightforward. 

The pricing is actually quite reasonable.

I was looking at the Rapid7 and Darktrace before choosing Intercept. 

Overall, I rate the solution an 8 out of 10. 

We use Intercept X Endpoint because it has proved stable. We also have a Sophos firewall and Sophos server.

Intercept X Endpoint has been stable, and I appreciate the centralized management and the reporting feature. The Heartbeat is another valuable feature of Intercept X Endpoint.

I would inquire why it is not sold directly to end users.

I have been using Intercept X Endpoint since 2018.

I rate the stability of Intercept X Endpoint as eight out of ten.

I rate the scalability as eight out of ten.

Technical support from Sophos is rated as nine out of ten, which represents high quality.

Positive

Before Intercept X Endpoint, we used McAfee and Kaspersky. We switched to Sophos because it provided a unified solution.

The first setup is not very straightforward and requires a lot of expertise.

The solution is cost-effective.

The pricing of Intercept X Endpoint is a bit high.

Based on my experience, I would recommend Intercept X Endpoint to other people.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We have a script that deploys the solution on machines when a user joins the local Active Directory domain. We manage it from Sophos Central in the cloud.

The solution protects us. The performance and stability are good.

The solution can tie up a computer. We're software developers. Sometimes, when we do a build, it has a lot of files. The scanning can slow it down quite a bit. We put exceptions to stop the tool from looking at those folders.

The cloud management console could be a little more user-friendly. There is a graph showing what happens when something is discovered. It's interesting, but I think the information could be presented better and that there could be more information.

I have been using the solution for about 18 years.

The tool’s stability is fine.

The tool is scalable. We use it to protect 40 endpoints, and we have other customers who have more than 100 endpoints. Our technical team needs two people.

The support is good.

The setup is straightforward. If we're installing it locally on a computer that's just joined to the domain, it would require a script. Setting up the script is quite simple. Setting up, testing, and getting it right takes about half an hour. It works out of the box.

If we have to set up a computer that has not joined our domain, we must log on to the cloud portal and choose to protect the computer. We can download the file that we run on the computer. It's pretty straightforward. We don't need any external help. The deployment is seamless across our organization's endpoints.

The product is moderately priced. We pay a yearly license fee.

We haven’t had any major incidents. The product occasionally picks up and prevents something from happening. We're lucky not to have had any major incidents. Every now and again, the solution pops up and tells us that it stopped something, but we don't keep data on it. We wouldn't know how it's impacted us.

I wouldn't recommend the solution because we are investigating alternatives. We are considering MDR solutions. We might choose Microsoft Defender because it is included with other Microsoft products. In an ideal world, the product has no benefit. It's like insurance. We hope we never have to use it. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use it just for antivirus detection. There was a facility where you could send a fake email to find out who clicked on these links. So this option is not available. We just have a simple NDR.

The most valuable feature is that it literally works. We have reduced a lot of complaints after switching to Sophos. Because we had Bitdefender, it was also good, and we could not find it to renew it.

There is room for improvement in terms of stability and updates. Updates, like if someone does not turn on the computer for six months, and then it gets expired, then you have to manually remove it and then reinstall it.

I have been using this solution for five years now. We use the latest version. 

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. It is a stable solution. There is no problem at all in the cloud. 

Sometimes we cannot rate stability a ten out of ten because, you know, there are some updates. If it doesn't happen, then you have to uninstall it and then reinstall it. If you're working in remote locations, you cannot do it easily. Then you have to ask someone to do it manually. It's something we can't do that much.

The solution is extensively used. We began with 300 users and then 1800 users. And now, we have around 3,000 end-users using this solution. So, we have plans to increase the further usage. 

I contacted support once for license activation. 

In Bitdefender, we used to have a virtual machine, and there was only one engineer available who was in Kuwait. And if he's busy, you cannot do anything. There were some technical problems also. But since we are using Intercept X Endpoint cloud-based solution, everything goes smoothly. 

The initial setup is really simple. We install it in our active directory. It can be set up automatically.

It took two minutes, maybe even less than two minutes, and then it keeps updating on the back end. So users do not feel anything.

We have been working in IT for the last twenty years, so we know how to do this.

I'm also the network administrator, so we use an active directory to deploy it, and we got it integrated into our Windows Solution image. It gets updated, and it gets installed by itself.

It's good. Not that expensive.

We go for the three years plan.

I recommend it to everyone. It's easy to use. It's still strong and light on the computer. It doesn't take a lot of memory. The feature I found valuable is that it works for signature antivirus as well as finding signatures.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

We use Sophos Intercept X to protect the endpoint devices in our organization, such as PCs and MacBooks.

Sophos Intercept X is a full package. It's more than only an antivirus solution to find the malicious code. We also use it to filter malicious websites and detect applications that have been outlined in our corporate policy.

The most valuable feature of Sophos Intercept X is a web filtering and URL sanity checks. Overall the solution is well balanced with all its features.

The majority of our systems are MacBooks and their solution release cycle is slow to endorsing or support the MacBook's latest OS or hardware platform. For example, when Sophos macOS Big Sur version 11 was released, it took them a while to support this version of OS. A similar situation occurred when the MacBook M1 hardware CPU was released. They have not fully supported the native M1 CPU to this day. They need to speed up the solutions release cycle.

The majority of our systems are Apple-based, this issue is more noticeable on the Apple platforms.

I have been using Sophos Intercept X for approximately two years.

The stability or performance of Sophos Intercept X is good. However, sometimes users have needed to have their configuration fine-tuned to allow better performance.

We have approximately 50 users using this solution.

We use Sophos Intercept X extensively and we use everything the solutions offer.

The support I have experienced from Sophos Intercept X was great.

I would rate the support from Sophos Intercept X a five out of five.

I have used other solutions other than Sophos Intercept X in other organizations but it has been over two years ago.

I have been using Sophos Intercept X for over two years, in the beginning, the initial setup was straightforward but because they do not fully support the Apple platform, or they're pretty slow at supporting the Apple platform, the latest version supporting Apple is a little bit cumbersome to use. You need to walk the user through the process with some specific instructions or help the user directly. It's not as easy as it used to be.

I would rate the implementation process of Sophos Intercept X a four out of five.

We did the implementation of Sophos Intercept X in-house.

I do the maintenance of the solution. We are a smaller company and I am sufficient for the maintenance of the solution.

I have found the price of Sophos Intercept X to be reasonable.

I would advise others that they have to look at their environment to determine if this solution would be best suited. Sophos Intercept X for a small business that has a mix of PCs, MacBooks, and has the need for multiple security controls, this tool fits us well. For different environments, the organization might need other or additional tools. For example, if they may need threat protection. There are different vendors that may have an edge in certain areas than Sophos Intercept X has. For us, we need a balanced, multi-pronged approach for securing in our environment, Sophos Intercept X works well.

I rate Sophos Intercept X an eight out of ten.

I'm a partner with Sophos for Intercept X Endpoint. Our use cases are for main security needs, client needs, and handling urgent concerns.

Intercept X helps with internal alerts, application access, and triggering support teams. I've used temporary protection for quick responses, and it is user-friendly and manageable.            

I have been using Intercept X Endpoint for the past 17 years.

Scaling depends on XDR or MDR versions, with a reset needed for upgrades.

Support in India is limited to email and can be better through MSP partners.

Positive

I've used Kaspersky but prefer Sophos for its features.

Deployment is easy and fast, requiring two to three people for configuration.

Maintenance is easy, and scalability depends on whether using XDR or MDR, with a reset needed between upgrades.

It is not very expensive but I don't have specific pricing details. The licensing is usually done on yearly basis.

I'd rate it an eight. It's a solid solution for centralized security needs and threat monitoring.

We use the solution for protecting our network and endpoints using the same vendors. This integrated approach provides a robust fit, enabling better 360-degree protection than having standalone systems.

There are two approaches in antivirus, i.e., device intelligence and cloud intelligence. The beauty of Sophos is that it will not take the load from the computers. All the monitoring or detections happened through a cloud engine. It is a very light antivirus on my computer.

It has a minimum impact in comparison to Kaspersky or Defender. I've been a customer of the Defender since 2004 or 2005, but Sophos is lighter than even the Defender.

Kaspersky is very heavy. Norton has reached a very low detection rate. The Defender has more options than Sophos on a personal level, but on the enterprise level, it is a much higher level than Defender on the XDR side.

Configuration is straightforward on the endpoint. It wasn't getting updated properly. The firewall is good, but the interface can be slightly better.

The solution is expensive. In the end, everyone would look to have better pricing for the product.

I have been using Sophos Intercept since 2016 or 2017.

The product is stable.

The solution's scalability is not so good. Antivirus has no scalability. Since it's a cloud solution, you have to purchase a license. The scalability is on Sophos' side.

400 users are using this solution.

We used to contact customer support since we were paying for AMC.

The VPN client isn't compatible with Mac, although the environment doesn't heavily rely on Mac devices.

Positive

The initial setup wasn’t that complicated. The interface wasn’t user-friendly compared to other brands. I had to establish the network from scratch, set up the environment, configure the devices, join the domain for group policy, and install the necessary software. That was the approach I followed during the implementation.

The deployment took 20 days for nearly 300 computers.

The solution costs around $40-42 per license.

The solution's maintenance is very straightforward unless we are forcing updates. I'm using it on my Mac. We feel nothing about Sophos because it is running in the background and protecting.

The solution is value for money because it holds a value. I have not experienced any virus attacks in the last six or seven years. If it gets the virus, then it will be isolated, etc. Overall, I didn't face any issues.

I recommend the solution with a basic subscription and security.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.