Intercept X Endpoint Reviews

The solution is primarily used for endpoint. 

The client isolation feature is a very effective feature. There is a lot of information you can find in the console. Management is good. They're always giving you information on the products you have rather than trying to send you new products.

I have been using Intercept X Endpoint for 3 months. 

The solution is stable and I rate the stability an 8 out of 10. 

I have only spoken to technical support during installation. 

When talking to sales support or technical people, I find that they're all very busy. It takes a few days to be able to actually have a meeting arranged. If I contact them that I want to have a meeting with somebody technical from Sophos to go over an implementation or something that I wanted to get out of the product, they may not be available for 6 or 7 days.

Neutral

The initial setup is straightforward. 

The pricing is actually quite reasonable.

I was looking at the Rapid7 and Darktrace before choosing Intercept. 

Overall, I rate the solution an 8 out of 10. 

We use Intercept X Endpoint because it has proved stable. We also have a Sophos firewall and Sophos server.

Intercept X Endpoint has been stable, and I appreciate the centralized management and the reporting feature. The Heartbeat is another valuable feature of Intercept X Endpoint.

I would inquire why it is not sold directly to end users.

I have been using Intercept X Endpoint since 2018.

I rate the stability of Intercept X Endpoint as eight out of ten.

I rate the scalability as eight out of ten.

Technical support from Sophos is rated as nine out of ten, which represents high quality.

Positive

Before Intercept X Endpoint, we used McAfee and Kaspersky. We switched to Sophos because it provided a unified solution.

The first setup is not very straightforward and requires a lot of expertise.

The solution is cost-effective.

The pricing of Intercept X Endpoint is a bit high.

Based on my experience, I would recommend Intercept X Endpoint to other people.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We have a script that deploys the solution on machines when a user joins the local Active Directory domain. We manage it from Sophos Central in the cloud.

The solution protects us. The performance and stability are good.

The solution can tie up a computer. We're software developers. Sometimes, when we do a build, it has a lot of files. The scanning can slow it down quite a bit. We put exceptions to stop the tool from looking at those folders.

The cloud management console could be a little more user-friendly. There is a graph showing what happens when something is discovered. It's interesting, but I think the information could be presented better and that there could be more information.

I have been using the solution for about 18 years.

The tool’s stability is fine.

The tool is scalable. We use it to protect 40 endpoints, and we have other customers who have more than 100 endpoints. Our technical team needs two people.

The support is good.

The setup is straightforward. If we're installing it locally on a computer that's just joined to the domain, it would require a script. Setting up the script is quite simple. Setting up, testing, and getting it right takes about half an hour. It works out of the box.

If we have to set up a computer that has not joined our domain, we must log on to the cloud portal and choose to protect the computer. We can download the file that we run on the computer. It's pretty straightforward. We don't need any external help. The deployment is seamless across our organization's endpoints.

The product is moderately priced. We pay a yearly license fee.

We haven’t had any major incidents. The product occasionally picks up and prevents something from happening. We're lucky not to have had any major incidents. Every now and again, the solution pops up and tells us that it stopped something, but we don't keep data on it. We wouldn't know how it's impacted us.

I wouldn't recommend the solution because we are investigating alternatives. We are considering MDR solutions. We might choose Microsoft Defender because it is included with other Microsoft products. In an ideal world, the product has no benefit. It's like insurance. We hope we never have to use it. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use it just for antivirus detection. There was a facility where you could send a fake email to find out who clicked on these links. So this option is not available. We just have a simple NDR.

The most valuable feature is that it literally works. We have reduced a lot of complaints after switching to Sophos. Because we had Bitdefender, it was also good, and we could not find it to renew it.

There is room for improvement in terms of stability and updates. Updates, like if someone does not turn on the computer for six months, and then it gets expired, then you have to manually remove it and then reinstall it.

I have been using this solution for five years now. We use the latest version. 

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. It is a stable solution. There is no problem at all in the cloud. 

Sometimes we cannot rate stability a ten out of ten because, you know, there are some updates. If it doesn't happen, then you have to uninstall it and then reinstall it. If you're working in remote locations, you cannot do it easily. Then you have to ask someone to do it manually. It's something we can't do that much.

The solution is extensively used. We began with 300 users and then 1800 users. And now, we have around 3,000 end-users using this solution. So, we have plans to increase the further usage. 

I contacted support once for license activation. 

In Bitdefender, we used to have a virtual machine, and there was only one engineer available who was in Kuwait. And if he's busy, you cannot do anything. There were some technical problems also. But since we are using Intercept X Endpoint cloud-based solution, everything goes smoothly. 

The initial setup is really simple. We install it in our active directory. It can be set up automatically.

It took two minutes, maybe even less than two minutes, and then it keeps updating on the back end. So users do not feel anything.

We have been working in IT for the last twenty years, so we know how to do this.

I'm also the network administrator, so we use an active directory to deploy it, and we got it integrated into our Windows Solution image. It gets updated, and it gets installed by itself.

It's good. Not that expensive.

We go for the three years plan.

I recommend it to everyone. It's easy to use. It's still strong and light on the computer. It doesn't take a lot of memory. The feature I found valuable is that it works for signature antivirus as well as finding signatures.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

I'm a partner with Sophos for Intercept X Endpoint. Our use cases are for main security needs, client needs, and handling urgent concerns.

Intercept X helps with internal alerts, application access, and triggering support teams. I've used temporary protection for quick responses, and it is user-friendly and manageable.            

I have been using Intercept X Endpoint for the past 17 years.

Scaling depends on XDR or MDR versions, with a reset needed for upgrades.

Support in India is limited to email and can be better through MSP partners.

Positive

I've used Kaspersky but prefer Sophos for its features.

Deployment is easy and fast, requiring two to three people for configuration.

Maintenance is easy, and scalability depends on whether using XDR or MDR, with a reset needed between upgrades.

It is not very expensive but I don't have specific pricing details. The licensing is usually done on yearly basis.

I'd rate it an eight. It's a solid solution for centralized security needs and threat monitoring.

We use the solution for protecting our network and endpoints using the same vendors. This integrated approach provides a robust fit, enabling better 360-degree protection than having standalone systems.

There are two approaches in antivirus, i.e., device intelligence and cloud intelligence. The beauty of Sophos is that it will not take the load from the computers. All the monitoring or detections happened through a cloud engine. It is a very light antivirus on my computer.

It has a minimum impact in comparison to Kaspersky or Defender. I've been a customer of the Defender since 2004 or 2005, but Sophos is lighter than even the Defender.

Kaspersky is very heavy. Norton has reached a very low detection rate. The Defender has more options than Sophos on a personal level, but on the enterprise level, it is a much higher level than Defender on the XDR side.

Configuration is straightforward on the endpoint. It wasn't getting updated properly. The firewall is good, but the interface can be slightly better.

The solution is expensive. In the end, everyone would look to have better pricing for the product.

I have been using Sophos Intercept since 2016 or 2017.

The product is stable.

The solution's scalability is not so good. Antivirus has no scalability. Since it's a cloud solution, you have to purchase a license. The scalability is on Sophos' side.

400 users are using this solution.

We used to contact customer support since we were paying for AMC.

The VPN client isn't compatible with Mac, although the environment doesn't heavily rely on Mac devices.

Positive

The initial setup wasn’t that complicated. The interface wasn’t user-friendly compared to other brands. I had to establish the network from scratch, set up the environment, configure the devices, join the domain for group policy, and install the necessary software. That was the approach I followed during the implementation.

The deployment took 20 days for nearly 300 computers.

The solution costs around $40-42 per license.

The solution's maintenance is very straightforward unless we are forcing updates. I'm using it on my Mac. We feel nothing about Sophos because it is running in the background and protecting.

The solution is value for money because it holds a value. I have not experienced any virus attacks in the last six or seven years. If it gets the virus, then it will be isolated, etc. Overall, I didn't face any issues.

I recommend the solution with a basic subscription and security.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The solution is used to protect organizations from malware and phishing emails.

The solution is very useful. The product protects an organization from known and unknown threats. A dedicated team monitors the solution 24/7 to protect it from unknown threats. It is very good for protection from cyber threats. The product is user-friendly.

The product’s DDoS and AI features must be improved.

I have been using the solution for around six to nine months.

We haven’t faced any issues with the tool’s stability.

The tool is scalable.

The technical support is very good.

Positive

I have also used Cisco, Palo Alto, and Trend Micro. Intercept X provides prompt service. It has user-friendly dashboards. We are able to meet our client’s expectations well.

The initial setup is very easy. Customers choose the product because it has a user-friendly dashboard. It is not complicated. It is easy to understand. To deploy the tool, we install it in the client’s server and enable the policies they require, like USB filtering, URL filtering, and web control traffic. The customers have their own DLP methods. We enable it as per the requirements. Our service team is involved in the deployment process. It takes 40 to 60 minutes to deploy the tool. It is easy to maintain the product.

The solution’s pricing is good.

I would recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

This product is basically used for detecting ransomware. It will monitor all of the ransomware threats. Since the first ransomware attack happened in 2017, WannaCry, it has been a global threat. It is a vulnerability that is impacting a lot of devices and computers in the network.

Ransomware threats have been identified as one of the first priorities in the entire info security segment. Information security consists of various things including endpoint detection, threat detection, and then your SIEMs like QRadar or ArcSight.

At the early point of detection, Sopho is going to stop the ransomware. The question that has been there since 2017 is how it will identify the ransomware and how does it stop the attack from happening to the network. WannaCry was the first large ransomware attack, which has impacted various regions and is a very high severity threat. Since then, a lot of things have been lined up for mitigating the risk, like WannaCry.

improved considerably

Machine learning is used to detect the threat and it does so by prioritizing the suspicious activities. There is no human intervention in some cases, which is the trend that is happening with most of these products. High-end products and sophisticated products include machine learning capabilities for detecting the threats.

There are hackers who hack the artificial intelligence component using artificial intelligence itself. These sophisticated hackers are using AI capabilities, and the problem is that with no human intervention, machine learning can be defeated. The consequence is that somebody still has to keep watch and monitor the detection from the threat scanning.

Better protection in the endpoint, server, and mobile is needed. Those three areas should be fully protected. It should stop ransomware from installing, it should stop it from deploying, and it should also block unauthorized file encryption. In summary, it should have more protection, better detection, and better response.

We have been using Sophos Intercept X for more than two and a half years.

Sophos Intercept-X is a stable solution and we plan to continue using it in the future.

This is a scalable product and we have more than 7,500 devices connected to the network.

The technical support is 24x7 and it is good. They have different points of contact within the support regions like India, Singapore, and various other regions.

We have Sophos running in parallel with Sophos Cloud, in some of the regions.

The initial setup is quite simple and it will take a couple of hours.

I and my team deploy and maintain this solution. The deployment happens on the cloud.

This is a good solution but that said, there are breaches that are happening, and they are happening using AI. So, the attackers are also that sophisticated and it means that somebody has to sit and do the human check as well.

Ultimately, what happens is that the threats are found, and then the response action is taken based on the outcome of all these steps.

This is a product that I can recommend to others. The DR has better capabilities, as it's powered by machine learning.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.