The primary use case of this solution is for routing.
Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Easy to install, easy to use, and there is a lot of documentation
Pros and Cons
- "It's easy to use."
- "The interface could be better. It needs improvement."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
It's easy to use.
What needs improvement?
The interface could be better. It needs improvement.
We do everything in configuration files and it is not simple. It is quite complicated when you configure some rules for the firewall because it has several firewall levels.
In some switches, at times we have some issues, but it's on the infrastructure part and it's not the latest hardware.
In the future, I would like to see more standardized software. For example, some of the switches use some features that should be implemented in Juniper.
The software should be more stable.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using these switches for more than four years.
We are not using the latest version.
We use Juniper MX960 and the QFX5100 for the core switch.
Buyer's Guide
Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's a scalable product.
We have millions of clients who are using this solution daily.
In our organization, we have 20 people who are using it.
How are customer service and support?
We have not contacted technical support.
There is a lot of documentation that you can read whenever required.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we used Cisco. We switched because we run 100 switches and started to use the IPv6 and we were told that we had to pay $100,000 for the IPv6 license.
In Juniper, you will not have this issue because many of the licenses and a lot of software are already included in the basic version.
How was the initial setup?
The installation was simple.
The configuration of the hardware took a few weeks because it was the first time we deployed it.
We have a team of two technical members to maintain this product.
What about the implementation team?
We completed the installation ourselves.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this product to anyone who is interested in using it.
We plan to continue using these switches in the future. It still works and it's quite stable.
I would rate Juniper Ethernet Switches a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Data Center Architecture and Planning at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Good stability and extremely good scalability but doesn't offer very good integrations
Pros and Cons
- "The scalability is excellent. It's one of the aspects of the solution that is quite good."
- "We are undergoing a migration to software-defined networking. Different vendors have to integrate with each other and we are not seeing this type of capability within Juniper. We are getting left behind in this technology trend by staying with this solution. Juniper is also losing a bit of market share because of this."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for our data center.
What is most valuable?
The switches are pretty typical. They offer good control and good switching.
What needs improvement?
We're currently in the process of switching to Cisco as we haven't been too happy with Juniper.
We are undergoing a migration to software-defined networking. Different vendors have to integrate with each other and we are not seeing this type of capability within Juniper. We are getting left behind in this technology trend by staying with this solution. Juniper is also losing a bit of market share because of this.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for between five and ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is excellent. It's one of the aspects of the solution that is quite good.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is not so good. Sometimes we contact them, but they don't offer the best service.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. I joined the company after deployment, so I'm not sure how long it takes.
What other advice do I have?
We use the on-premises deployment model.
I'd rate the solution no more than seven out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
External Plant Coordinator with 201-500 employees
Supports all our connectivity infrastructure in our datacenter
Pros and Cons
- "Juniper supports all our connectivity infrastructure in our datacenter, supporting optimal availability and performance for services."
- "The Virtual Chassis, because you have a centralized administration of a set of switches which makes the operation more efficient."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use is as a datacenter, as aggregation and access switches. They are also used in wireless nodes in the core switch segment receiving all last mile services, as in optical fiber.
How has it helped my organization?
Juniper supports all our connectivity infrastructure in our datacenter, supporting optimal availability and performance for services.
What is most valuable?
The Virtual Chassis, because you have a centralized administration of a set of switches which makes the operation more efficient.
What needs improvement?
Support prices and licensing scheme need to be improved to allow some features to be purchased at lower costs, for example, RPM.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used Cisco.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated Brocade.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Owner at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Pros and cons of both Cisco and Juniper configs, but you can see the benefit of why they organized it the way they did
After being primarily a Cisco user for many years, I find the switch to Juniper refreshing. The CLI is intuitive and I appreciate the hierarchy of the various configuration groups to be much more organized. I also think it is better with regard to config checking, and ensuring that the items entered into the config work with the rest of the config. For example if you happen to forget a line in a policy, or make an error in referencing a particular object, it will not let you commit the config. I know there are pros and cons of both configs, but once you get used to Juniper, you can see the benefit of why they organized it the way they did.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Works at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
I'd like to see it's cost go down but it has optimal TCO
Valuable Features
Optimal TCO
Improvements to My Organization
It's not about improvement, it is more about optimal decision making.
Room for Improvement
Stability issues and its cost.
Use of Solution
Juniper EX series About 2-3 years
Deployment Issues
I haven't seen any issues with deployment.
Stability Issues
Seldom
Scalability Issues
Standard questions about more clients ports on devices.
Customer Service and Technical Support
Customer Service: Good, but not the best.Technical Support: Good.
Initial Setup
We had some questions, but that's it.
Implementation Team
We did some prep with the vendor team which was very helpful.
Other Solutions Considered
Cisco solutions and some others.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Administrator at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Impressive features but switches are facing tough competition
Valuable Features:
From the technology point of view quality, design, and look-and-feel is good. Network administrators can easily manage and configure these network switches. I have easily configured an L3 switch to create a network campus backbone. Low maintenance required. No certification (CCNA, CCIE) is required to become a network administrator to set up a Juniper network.
Room for Improvement:
During price negotiation we found that price is high compared to other switches. High price is obstructing sales in market. I felt that on-site and telephone support is not satisfactory.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Firewall Engineer at a marketing services firm with 1-10 employees
Highly stable, good performance, and modern protocol
Pros and Cons
- "The combination of hardware and software makes it a very good solution. It is a modern protocol that they have supported in the switches. The solution has good performance."
- "I have found the scalability could be improved in the version I was using."
What is our primary use case?
Juniper is a very powerful open-source operating system. You are able to do routing and other tasks using the switches. I was using Juniper Ethernet Switches for a hotspot network.
What is most valuable?
The combination of hardware and software makes it a very good solution. It is a modern protocol that they have supported in the switches. The solution has good performance.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for a few months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is highly stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have found the scalability could be improved in the version I was using.
We have approximately 90 users using this solution.
How was the initial setup?
The configuration of the solution could be easier. We had to do the configuration through the command-line interface. However, we are using an older version and the newer versions could be better with a graphical interface.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution does not require a license to use it.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Juniper Ethernet Switches a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Network Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Secure, easy to install, easy to use, scalable, with good technical support
Pros and Cons
- "The security is good."
- "They could improve the code, as there are some issues with it."
What is our primary use case?
We use only Firewalls, Juniper Switches. We don't have SD-WAN solutions.
We use this solution for connecting.
What is most valuable?
It's user-friendly.
The security is good.
What needs improvement?
Stability is an area that needs improvement.
They could improve the code, as there are some issues with it.
Marketing could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Juniper Ethernet Switches for six years.
We are using the EX series.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable solution, but there are some limitations.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I don't have any issues with scalability.
How are customer service and technical support?
The vendor support is good.
The technical support is good.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. It's not complex. It's easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't have any knowledge of pricing, I am in the technical department.
What other advice do I have?
It's a good product.
It's user-friendly and has good security also.
I would recommend it to others.
I would rate Juniper Ethernet Switches an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Ethernet SwitchesPopular Comparisons
Cisco Ethernet Switches
Aruba Switches
NETGEAR Switches
MikroTik Routers and Switches
Ubiquiti UniFi Switches
Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access
Arista Networks Platform
D-Link Ethernet Switches
Meraki MS Switches
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches
Huawei Ethernet Switches
HPE Ethernet Switches
NVIDIA Mellanox
H3C Ethernet Switches
Brocade Ethernet Switches
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Juniper vs Cisco ethernet switches: Which one is better?
- How does Juniper compare to alternative networking solutions?
- What switch is a good alternative to the Juniper CGS2520?
- How would you improve Cisco and Juniper Ethernet Switches?
- In terms of ethernet switches, would you go with Cisco or Juniper?
- Juniper vs Cisco ethernet switches: Which one is better?
- When evaluating Ethernet Switches, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Which Ethernet switch do you use? Why?
- What are your recommended Layer 2 and Layer 3 network switches if the main consideration is performance?
- Does anyone have statistics on how often a fire occurs in a computer room?
Hi, well to your point about rollbacks, the benefits of this feature are quite obvious in that they provide a fail safe mechanism should your changes inadvertently isolate you from a remote device due to some unforeseen error/mistake (it happens!).
I often hear people compare this age old Junos feature to Cisco's "reload in|at x" command, however if the difference isn't already obvious, that command results is a device reload, whereas Junos rollbacks do not. Picture a scenario whereby your action isolates you from a remote device yet that device is still carrying production traffic loads. In this scenario, the user of rollback would be able to regain access to the device without impact to traffic through the device, whereas the user of the reload command would see an outage. Consider a worst case scenario whereby the device fails to complete its boot cycle and there my friend you have hell on your hands. May as well pack your stuff into a box and grab your coat at that point.