We use this solution for integration. It is deployed on cloud.
We have about 50 people using this solution.
We use this solution for integration. It is deployed on cloud.
We have about 50 people using this solution.
Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets.
It's a skill that must be learned. I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified.
I have been using this solution for two years.
The solution is stable.
It's decently scalable.
We have never had to use technical support. The solution is straightforward and documentation is decent.
Initial setup was straightforward. Maintenance is done in-house.
I would rate this solution 7 out of 10.
We use the product for integration between on-premise and cloud products.
The product’s most valuable feature is integration.
There could be more AI features included in the product.
We have been using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps for three years.
I rate the product’s stability a nine out of ten.
I rate the platform’s scalability a ten out of ten.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps’s premium support services are excellent.
Positive
The initial setup is easy. I rate the process a ten out of ten. We have a deployment team consisting of four executives. It takes a few hours to complete the process.
The product generates around 10% ROI for us.
It is a cost-efficient platform.
It is an excellent and efficient product. I rate it a nine out of ten.
We use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps for building an insurance product. We integrate multiple solutions using it.
The product has efficient connectors.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could have more customization options for connectors.
We have been using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps for nine months.
I rate the product's stability a ten out of ten.
We have more than 50 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps users in our organization. I rate its scalability an eight.
The technical support team's response time could be faster.
Positive
We are using MuleSoft. The connectors need improvement. Also, its deployment process is lengthy for building applications compared to Logic Apps.
The initial setup is straightforward. I rate the process a nine out of ten. It takes around 25 to 30 minutes to complete. It requires four executives for implementation.
I rate Microsoft Azure Logic Apps's pricing a seven out of ten.
I rate Microsoft Azure Logic Apps a nine out of ten. It works well for deployment and building connectors. It allows us to connect interfaces of two different platforms easily in a graphical way rather than using coding.
Our use case of Azure Logic Apps is for the integration of data coming from different sources to the manager. We are Microsoft partners and I'm the company director.
I like the connectivity, that it's easy to use and has the capabilities to be able to integrate with other Azure-based environments.
I'd like to see more connectors available as well as a more advanced development environment.
I've been using this solution for two years.
The solution is stable.
The solution is scalable.
We are a Microsoft partner so we have good support although we haven't used it for this product.
The initial setup is relatively straightforward and takes a couple of hours. As a consultancy company providing this product to our customers, we carried out our own in-house deployment. We're currently implementing this solution for six of our customers. The deployment requires an architect and one or two others.
Licensing costs are paid monthly or annually and I believe they are reasonable. The cost is dependent on the connectors.
I recommend this solution and rate it eight out of 10.
The product integration with Active Directory and detailed execution tracking for debugging are the most valuable features.
Integrating the process with Azure AD is significantly complex, especially when deploying ARM templates and multi-factor authentication (MFA) is involved. This particular area needs improvement.
Additionally, enhancing scalability features, such as implementing queuing mechanisms for high-concurrency scenarios, would greatly improve its utility.
I've been using Azure Logic Apps for over four years.
The product is stable. I rate the stability a nine.
The platform scalability is quite low, around five out of ten. It struggles under heavy loads without proper queuing mechanisms, leading to performance issues and errors.
It is suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises looking to automate simple processes efficiently. However, due to integration limitations, larger enterprises should carefully consider their use based on specific use cases.
Microsoft's technical support varies significantly based on the size and partnership level of the enterprise. Larger enterprises receive better support compared to smaller or medium-sized businesses.
The product pricing aligns well with the value and capabilities offered by Azure services.
I rate the platform a seven out of ten.
We use the solution to integrate other systems like SAP and Salesforce for orchestration and the API. We also use it to automate business processing and balancing workflows.
The solution integrates customer CRM data with various systems. It offers a user-friendly interface, making integration tasks straightforward and efficient.
The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment.
The pricing could be improved.
I have been using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps for five to ten years.
The product is very stable.
The solution is scalable.
The technical support is good. Documentation is also very good.
The initial setup is straightforward. Also, the learning curve is easy.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has a straightforward nature. The process is much simpler. This design is designed for seamless integration, making Logic Apps the preferred choice.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We use the solution for orchestration and workflow to execute all the processes manually.
The most important feature is integration by email.
The solution can integrate with different ETL tools. It can integrate with Azure Data Factory and a more open connecter.
I have been using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps for two years.
The product is stable.
I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.
Three users are using this solution in our organization.
I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.
Customer support is good but takes time to respond.
Positive
The initial setup can be done within an hour.
I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.
The product is expensive. It has a pay-as-go model. If the consumption is high, it will cost more. The billing depends on consumption.
Logic Apps is a low-code development. One can easily do the development and save the workflow. It is user-friendly, offering different connectivity with different services. It should be leveraged as much as possible.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
It's very easy to use, and it's blazing fast. The best thing about Logic Apps is actually its ability to create a solution in a matter of hours. It doesn't need any kind of provisioning, and you don't need any kind of hardware. You can create very small elements like these Logic Apps, and you can build a whole solution from those very simple and small elements.
I also like that they are completely incorporated with your existing active directory. You can use user groups directly from the active directory inside Azure and access it from the Logic Apps.
You don't need to do anything special, and you just have access. You can just check if the user is, for example, allowed to do some action. Normally it would take you some additional steps and some additional calls to check it. You have to come back to the active directory to make this possible. In Logic Apps, you just have it, and you can use it.
I think that there's this concept of logging and recall to the Logic App. It shows you every single step, every single product, and the result it's returning to the next step. It also has an amazing debugging feature.
You can rerun some calls and see if, after a correction of the Logic App, for example, you get the correct results. So, it's almost like it's alive. It's like you make a change, poof it, and it's in production, and it's working. The speed of the composition of the problem and creating a real solution for it is extremely fast with this solution. It's extremely fast in creation.
The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure.
I have been using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps for more than a year.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is scalable.
It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost.
At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use.
We're developing our solutions on three elements. One element is Logic Apps, and it represents our functionalities. The second element is Cosmos DB, which is the database and the persistence for our solutions. The third element is the storage account. Inside the storage account, you have a special folder called Web. You can put it inside this folder. You can put any single-page application, like Angular.
In the Angular application, you have hosting of that application and application files for free. So, we put an Angular single-page application into this storage account, which is calling Logic Apps, for the functionalities and endpoints.
In the backend, we had the Cosmos DB, which is the database for the whole thing. You can add elements from the outside to connect the customer's data center to Azure and this application you have made. Azure doesn't even have to know or have access to customer systems.
In the end, you have a very scalable solution without the high risk of someone breaking it, and he will just know the data inside it. But he would not gain any access to the customer data center.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Azure Logic Apps a nine.