Netgate pfSense Reviews and Pricing - page 25 | PeerSpot

Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IT Chief at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Apr 30, 2015

The pfSense OS is stable, but if the service packages are not updated to their new version when the OS is updated, we can't use those features.

What is most valuable?

Load balancer
Multi-WAN

How has it helped my organization?

Network security and speed have both improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using it since 2010. I have used both the free version (5/10) and as a gold member (9/10).

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

Netgate pfSense

Free Report: Netgate pfSense Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Netgate pfSense. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

When they make an update available, the problem is that pfSense service packages are not updated, it's just the OS. The pfSense OS is stable, but if the service packages are not updated to their new version when the OS is updated, we can't use those features.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and support?

Customer Service:

5/10.

Technical Support:

5/10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used -

Debian IPtables
Squid
I7 Patch

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

it_user267969Sr. Sys Admin at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Report as inappropriate

Jul 7, 2015

Hi,

SG-4860 pfSense® Security Gateway Appliance which we bought.

Also could u please tell me how will contact pfsense support?

Is there any on call facility to pfsense?

How many times they will support if we device buy?

Regards,
Giridharreddy Daida.

See all 3 comments

Manager IT at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Mar 31, 2015

The proxy filtering is valuable except for blocking HTTPS which it can't do.

What is most valuable?

MAC Filtered DHCP and DNS
Captive Portal
VPN
Proxy Server
Proxy Filter

How has it helped my organization?

It has provided us with secure internet browsing and a strong monitoring ability.

What needs improvement?

Proxy filters are not supported for the blocking of HTTPS sites.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for two to three years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered yet.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered yet.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered yet.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

I have not gotten any support from the customer service center because I can get all the solutions on their web blogs.

Technical Support:

I think it is perfect.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I was using another product, but it didn't have a bandwidth controller and monitoring tool like this product does. I switched because I can find everything in one window.

How was the initial setup?

Its installation setup & procedure is so simple that a layman could install it.

What about the implementation team?

I installed it by myself and used Google for assistance.

What was our ROI?

It's positive.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I just downloaded the program from the website free of chard. The best thing is, this product can be installed on any machine.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No other options were evaluated.

What other advice do I have?

It is recommended, as it is a stable product.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

it_user221874Manager IT at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Report as inappropriate

Jul 13, 2015

Can any one have experienced to deploy Pfsense on Hyper-V ... I am planning to deploy this scenario.

See all 2 comments

Netgate pfSense

Free Report: Netgate pfSense Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Netgate pfSense. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

System Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Jan 5, 2022

Affordable and scalable but some features are difficult to configure and enable

Pros and Cons

"Sophos Intercept X is scalable. Currently, we have almost 30 people using it in our company."

"It would be great to add more to security."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for this solution is Endpoint Advanced. I have set it up for the firewall and the open VPN connections.

What needs improvement?

It would be great to add more to security.

I know that pfSense has a lot of features, but I don't know how to configure and enable them. That is why I am looking into my support options. I am looking for better security and performance.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for almost two years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

pfSense is scalable. Currently, we have almost 30 people using it in our company.

How are customer service and support?

I'm currently struggling with deploying pfSense more extensively. Right now, we are not getting much support on their end.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My opinion about pfSense's pricing is good. They are open source.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

it_user284163 - PeerSpot reviewer

System Administrator at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 2, 2015

It's stable and features load balancing, although we've rebooted once in six months.

What is most valuable?

Snort
CARP
Load balancing
VPN

How has it helped my organization?

Reduced the cost of our firewall solution
Enhanced throughput compared with similar priced devices
Stability
Reliability

What needs improvement?

I'm no expert on this subject, and the OS performs all that is required.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for over one year.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We've only had to do one reboot in six months.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

None as yet, because the solution hasn't reached capacity yet.

How are customer service and technical support?

I'm yet to use the official tech support as the community provides all that I have required.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Sonicwall
Cisco ASA

We switched due to licensing costs and scalability.

How was the initial setup?

It's relatively simple and straightforward, with enough documentation avalable online for the average user to install and setup.

What was our ROI?

£2000+

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

it_user280953 - PeerSpot reviewer

Network Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Jul 29, 2015

It supports multiple ISP's, making it good for implementation, but it doesn't allow FTP.

Valuable Features

This product supports multiple ISP's, so it's good for implementation.

Improvements to My Organization

It's made us more productive.

Room for Improvement

FTP was not allowed, and it didn't indicate during set up whether FTP was to be allowed or disabled.

Use of Solution

I've used it for about one year.

Stability Issues

The stability is good.

Scalability Issues

The stability is good.

Customer Service and Technical Support

The technical support is good.

Pricing, Setup Cost and Licensing

It's free.

Other Advice

All the other features are good, and with it being free, it is very attractive to the users.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Senior Systems Engineer at KeyTrust

Oct 15, 2018

Perform packet captures on the command line and via the GUI which is useful for diagnosing problems

Pros and Cons

"The ability to perform packet captures on the command line and via the GUI is useful for diagnosing problems."

"I would like to see multiple DNS servers running on individual interfaces."

What is our primary use case?

We only use our pfSense as a stateful packet inspection firewall.

We have around 10 VLAN interfaces with many allow/block policies, VIPs, and NATs.
Running on VMware as a virtual machine.

How has it helped my organization?

The main improvement was we were able to replace our old hardware-based firewall with a virtual machine having HA.

What is most valuable?

The ability to perform packet captures on the command line and via the GUI is useful for diagnosing problems.

What needs improvement?

I would like to see multiple DNS servers running on individual interfaces.

It would be useful to manage firewall policies on a source interface and destination interface basis.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

it_user1136043 - PeerSpot reviewer

IT Manager at alfascan

Jul 3, 2019

Provides more control and a deeper insight into network traffic

Pros and Cons

"This solution has increased the level of security, given us more control, provided a deep insight into network traffic, and is a great VPN solution."

"We would like to see ready-made profiles to cover most users' needs."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution as our firewall, proxy, IDS, IPS, and VPN.

How has it helped my organization?

This solution has increased the level of security, given us more control, provided a deep insight into network traffic, and is a great VPN solution.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are the Proxy IPS and VPN.

What needs improvement?

We would like to see ready-made profiles to cover most users' needs.

For how long have I used the solution?

Three years.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

it_user229803 - PeerSpot reviewer

CEO & Founder at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Apr 28, 2015

It was very straightforward to implement but the RadiusServer needs to be improved.

What is most valuable?

Captive Portal
DHCP

How has it helped my organization?

pfSense made my life easier for controlling users and their bandwidth. My internet is not misused anymore.

What needs improvement?

RadiusServer needs some work done.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using it for five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I've never had any problems.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Yes I did.

How are customer service and technical support?

Since it's open source, the only support is available in public forums.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I used different routers, but because I wasn’t happy, I was trying different solutions and I found this one which was the most effective of all those I tried.

How was the initial setup?

It was very straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

I did it on my own.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It was free.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I looked at many hardware solutions.

What other advice do I have?

Go ahead and just implement it.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide

Download our free Netgate pfSense Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.

Updated: January 2025

Product Categories

Buyer's Guide

Download our free Netgate pfSense Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.

Netgate pfSense

Quick Links

Learn More:

Questions: