Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Solution Architect at ReDoy Corporation
Real User
Good scalability and stability with very responsive technical support
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is very stable. We don't have any downtime or issues of that nature."
  • "The solution is a bit more expensive than some of the available solutions in this region. One solution in particular that I noticed was cheaper was Kemp."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for network load balancing on the edge of the network. 

What is most valuable?

The solution's most valuable feature is the content.

What needs improvement?

The solution is a bit more expensive than some of the available solutions in this region. One solution in particular that I noticed was cheaper was Kemp. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for six years.
Buyer's Guide
NetScaler
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about NetScaler. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable. We don't have any downtime or issues of that nature.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is pretty scalable. Right now, we are only using about 40-50% of the solution's capacity. We have about 4,000 users connecting through the system. Currently, we don't plan to increase usage.

How are customer service and support?

Support has been okay so far. We only ever call about two times a year, but each time we get the right help. Once we called about custom features and they supported us quite well.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used Kemp Load Balancer. We still have it as part of our infrastructure. The main difference between the two is the Citrix solution is part of a physical appliance, whereas the Kemp solution is a virtual appliance.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. We had a very good engineer that handled the implementation.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There are costs in addition to the licensing fees, so the overall price can begin to add up.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend the solution to people who need the services and features provided by Citrix. It's a wonderful product. We've never had any downtime on our NetScaler solution. I'm pretty happy with it.

I'd rate it nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller.
PeerSpot user
it_user848784 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Scalability is great. One of the best features is that it can scale out.
Pros and Cons
  • "Scalability is great. One of the best features of NetScaler is that it can scale out."
  • "I would like to see more integration for single sign-on."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case is a low balancing geo failover. However, there are a lot of use cases that we use it for.

How has it helped my organization?

We use it for Citrix NetScaler MPX deployments. It is being used for publishing Citrix XenApp, mostly for load balancing, but we have been evaluating solutions for deploying it in multi-data centers. 

What is most valuable?

  • Global servers
  • Load balancing

We need multi-site and DNS failover.

What needs improvement?

It is difficult to customize. It is more difficult to customize than F5, for example. They have custom iRules that you can write for customized situations. 

I would like to see more integration for single sign-on on the Citrix side. F5 has done a lot of work on single sign-on capabilities, and it seems that NetScaler might be lacking a bit compared to F5.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have had very good luck with stability. However, we have always deployed in an HA configuration.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is great. One of the best features of NetScaler is that it can scale out.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support seems very knowledgeable if we have any problems. Support had been good when we needed it. We have not needed it that much, but they are good to work with.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used Windows Network Low Balancing.

What about the implementation team?

We had a consulting service help us with the setup.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We have been evaluating F5, Citrix, and other ADC products. Citrix is the most expense of all of them.

What other advice do I have?

You need to have somebody who understands application delivery controllers and all their features. If you don't have someone, I would highly recommend training in professional services to help out with it.

We are sort of in the evaluation process of replacing everything with one solution.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
NetScaler
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about NetScaler. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer786540 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Administrator at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Content Switching enables us to use one IP and leverage various back-end web app servers
Pros and Cons
  • "HTTP analysis and action. We have a lot of custom web applications that sometimes require custom header insertions. Some of these custom apps are external and, via the content switching, we can use one IP and leverage various back-end web app servers."
  • "Getting to use some of the advanced tools, even with the assistance of Citrix support, can be challenging."

What is our primary use case?

SSL offloading, load balancing, HTTP analysis and manipulation (HTTP rewrites, inserts, redirects) for web applications. Load balancing other ERP applications and Exchange.

How has it helped my organization?

We have a lot of custom web applications that sometimes require custom header insertions.  Some of these apps are externally accessible. In our current network design, we were using a routable address for every external resource that we presented. Via the Content Switching, we are using one routable IP for various systems, preserving our number of allocated public addresses.

What is most valuable?

HTTP analysis and action. We have a lot of custom web applications that sometimes require custom header insertions. Some of these custom apps are external and, via the Content Switching, we can use one IP and leverage various back-end web app servers.

What needs improvement?

For the most part, I don’t have complaints about the system and its solution. One of my prior gripes was that documentation and knowledge base articles were disjointed and/or were not complete. Citrix has done a great job over the last two and a half years of enhancing their support material.

For how long have I used the solution?

Three to five years.

What other advice do I have?

I would give the product a nine out of 10. The product is solid and truly is a Swiss army knife. However, getting to use some of the advanced tools, even with the assistance of Citrix support, can be challenging.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Rajnish Niraj - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder at Fencesense
Reseller
Seamless integration, robust, and useful UI
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of Citrix NetScaler was the seamless integration. Additionally, the UI is good."
  • "Citrix NetScaler has been recently acquired by another company and the support has been negatively impacted, the solution is at its end of life. The support for the solution could improve. The sales team needs to be improved."

What is our primary use case?

The main use of Citrix NetScaler was for application integration. My clients wanted their applications to be managed through Citrix NetScaler.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of  Citrix NetScaler was the seamless integration. Additionally, the UI is good.

What needs improvement?

Citrix NetScaler has been recently acquired by another company and the support has been negatively impacted, the solution is at its end of life. The support for the solution could improve. The sales team needs to be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used Citrix NetScaler within the last 12 months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Citrix NetScaler is stable and robust.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Citrix NetScaler is scalable but could improve.

I have three to four customers.

I rate the scalability of Citrix NetScaler a seven out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

The video technical support from Citrix NetScaler was satisfactory.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Citrix NetScaler is straightforward. The process is easier than competitors. The solution took us approximately 20 days to deploy because we had many applications that needed to be scheduled.

The requirement was to provide load balancing of multiple applications and publish all the applications behind Citrix NetScaler.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The license for Citrix NetScaler is on an annual basis and it is reasonably priced.

What other advice do I have?

I would not recommend this solution to others.

I rate Citrix NetScaler an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
PeerSpot user
Technical Support Engineer at Greenware Technologies LLC
Real User
Top 10
A complete solution that is customizable, easy to configure, and has the most features
Pros and Cons
  • "The maintenance of the solution is not complex."
  • "The vendor provides frequent patches, however, the security of the website has room for improvement."

What is our primary use case?

Citrix NetScaler is an Application Delivery Controller which we use to manage our gateway load balancing and web solution.

How has it helped my organization?

Citrix NetScaler supports our virtual appliance solutions.

What is most valuable?

Citrix NetScaler is a complete solution that is customizable, easy to configure, and has the most features.

What needs improvement?

Citrix NetScaler has stopped supporting the older versions and that has made it difficult for some of our clients. I would like to have continued support for older versions of the solution.

The vendor provides frequent patches, however, the security of the website has room for improvement.

The cost of the solution has room for improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for almost six years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable.

How are customer service and support?

The tech support is good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The older version was complex to set up but now the solution's GUI is easy to configure.

The deployment consists of going to the storefront and configuring Citrix NetScaler on-premises.

The deployment does not take long but after the basic configuration, we have to customize based on the customer's requirements.

What about the implementation team?

The implementation is completed in-house.

What was our ROI?

Our clients have seen a return on investment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I give the price of the solution a seven out of ten.

What other advice do I have?

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

The maintenance of the solution is not complex.

Citrix NetScaler is the best Application Delivery Controller on the market and I recommend it to others.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
PeerSpot user
reviewer1323054 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal IT Consultant at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Consultant
Numerous bugs so there is some instability; tech support could be improved
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a complete solution for those looking for an all-in-one."
  • "Too many bugs in the software and it's always difficult when you need to update."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use cases are for the different local LANs and for exchange, a local LAN SharePoint, a local LAN for web applications and for different RDP, remote desktop publishing solutions, a local LAN for intranet, web applications, internal web applications, etc. and for all command switching and full VPN gateway for Citrix and for apps and desktops. We deal with enterprise companies, so around 5,000 users. I'm the Senior Principal IT Consultant in our organization. 

What is most valuable?

Citrix is a complete solution for those looking for an all-in-one. It's all there, the NetScaler gateway, remote access, internet access, optimization, load balancing, you have Citrix desktop publishing and VDAs. You can create a complete solution with Citrix. That's a good thing. If you have to troubleshoot something there's no problem like you would have if you were working between different solutions. If you're dealing with different manufacturers, there's always a problem with troubleshooting - nobody wants to take responsibility.

What needs improvement?

The solution has too many bugs in the software and it's always difficult when you need to update. If you have bugs in one firmware and you fix them and then update, sometimes it doesn't work in the correct way. Even when there are new feature releases, the problems are not always solved. Instability is an issue. The product also offers a lot of features that are not necessary, you don't need them. 

Bug fixing is a problem in this solution and they should consider focusing on that in any future release. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for over 10 years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is somewhat lacking in stability. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability of the solution is fine. 

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support could be better. Response is good but when I open a ticket at Citrix because I have a problem, it's not because I want to check a simple configuration task on a support line, I want a solution.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I worked for a long time with F5. I've only worked with Microsoft and Cisco solutions. We're currently checking other options for a new customer. 

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup is straightforward, deployment time really depends on the environment of the customer. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I think the price is okay. 

What other advice do I have?

If anyone wants to implement this solution, it's important to be clear about your use case in order to grow with the product. Functionality always depends on the underlying networking. If there is trouble in the underlying networking, then you'll always have problems with NetScaler.

I would rate this product a three out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
Appwall677 - PeerSpot reviewer
Digital Transformation Division Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Runs behind the scenes, in the background and keeps everything running smoothly
Pros and Cons
  • "The web application firewall which protects our services on the internet, and then of course services like our ability to provide high availability for the services we are offering are the most valuable features."
  • "The user interface could be more friendly. Some wizards and other documentation for administrators, as well as some use cases, helps us to understand the solution."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is to provide security and ensure the viability of our services.

How has it helped my organization?

The services are almost 100% available to everybody. The solution is invisible for our clients, so by using it, nobody knows that anything is broken because we're hiding the service behind it. It works behind the scenes, in the background, and it keeps everything running smoothly.

What is most valuable?

The web application firewall which protects our services on the internet, and then of course services like our ability to provide high availability for the services we are offering are the most valuable features. 

What needs improvement?

The user interface could be more friendly. Some wizards and other documentation for administrators, as well as some use cases, helps us to understand the solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for 3 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable. On the client side, we have several thousand users. In the company itself, I would say there are more than one hundred users.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is very scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No, we haven't been using any other solution.

How was the initial setup?

For deployment, it depends on the maturity of the client. If it's the services that are going to be supported by the solution or if it's just a new one, but the number of services is very low, then the implementation would take a week. If you are implementing a major infrastructure project that will support lots of services, then it becomes complicated, so there's no idea really how long it would take.

For our company's size and complexity, I would say it's straightforward.

Most clients, rather rarely, have a dedicated person to maintain just that solution but almost anybody from the operational team can watch it, so I don't know how many people you would need for deployment and maintenance. I haven't done a headcount.

What about the implementation team?

We provide the consultancy ourselves.

What was our ROI?

This is a type of product that, in terms of security, the moment you implement it, it has an ROI because it secures the home system in the sense that no data is lost. No secrets get out.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There are some add ons to the standard licensing that you can buy for the basic version. You can extend with some add ons, or you can buy the premium version, so it depends on what your clients need. They get the packet and then they can do the add ons.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We were looking at different options according to price. We looked at the F5. The Citrix pricing was good for what it offers.

What other advice do I have?

It's always a really good idea to do a POC. There are companies that are not convinced as to why should they should use something, but a POC is a good way to show why. 

The quality of the service is higher, simply, and that's what you need. So that's why we are using the solution. Also, there are lots of securities that integrate with the solution, so it's good. You can very easily find a way for almost every customer to use it.

I would rate this solution as a 9 out of 10. The performance is very good. The price is also good. You get performance, and lots of features which are very flexible which give the opportunity to provide really advanced support and the quality of the services we are serving from the platform is high.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Infrastructure Specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Easy to configure and operate. The vendor team was not great.

What is most valuable?

  • Easy to configure the settings
  • Easy to operate
  • A lot of useful network and other great settings
  • A lot of official and unofficial documentations are available on the internet

How has it helped my organization?

It is used specially to provide Citrix Access Gateway to customers and their employees.

What needs improvement?

I cannot think of any features that should be added because the product has a lot of useful features already.

For how long have I used the solution?

Over a year with two customers.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No, easy to deploy.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No, very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No, because it can be merged into a cluster.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Yes, we also use F5 Big-IP LTM and in the past we used Cisco ACE. We didn’t switch specifically to use NetScaler, as we use the most appropriate solution depending on the customers needs.

How was the initial setup?

It depends on the customers needs. If they need high availability, if they need Clustering, the number of virtual servers needed and so on.

What about the implementation team?

We used both of them, but when we used the vendor team, their skills were bad and rework from our in-house was needed.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes, we use F5 Big-IP LTM and in the past we used Cisco ACE.

What other advice do I have?

Yes, two pieces of advice

  1. Do the official training; and 
  2. Use the Citrix documentation

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free NetScaler Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free NetScaler Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.