We used this mostly for disaster recovery plan (DRP), for global service load balancing, and Citrix Access Gateway.
Gerente Divisional at Tecnologia Especializada Asociada de México, S.A. De C.V
User-friendly setup with content switching and integrated caching features
Pros and Cons
- "Easy, user-friendly setup with content switching and integrated caching features."
- "The only thing customers told me that could be improved is that they would like to be able to purchase and receive the products in one box, rather than two boxes. This is something related to marketing, though."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
What I found most valuable from Citrix ADC were the Content Switching and Integrated Caching features which were the things we commonly installed for our customers.
What needs improvement?
The only thing customers told me that could be improved is that they would like to be able to purchase and receive the products in one box, rather than two boxes. This is something related to marketing, though.
For how long have I used the solution?
We were partners with Citrix for 15 years. We used it for 15 years.
Buyer's Guide
NetScaler
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about NetScaler. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I also found this solution to be stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I found it to be scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Our customers' feedback was that support wasn't the best. Cases were often on queue and there were delays in solving their issues, leading to customers getting angry. Support could be improved.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I was able to try F5 and Radware. The price for Citrix ADC here in Mexico was good when you compare it with F5 and Radware.
How was the initial setup?
The setup was easy. For the first version of this solution, it was not very user-friendly, but in the last edition we used, the setup was very user-friendly.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented it for our customers through our in-house team of 3 consultants. I think 3 people is sufficient for implementing this solution to our customers.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I was able to evaluate F5 and Radware.
What other advice do I have?
My rating for this solution is ten out of ten. I think it is the best product ever.
My recommendation is for customers here in Mexico to try it. I feel it is the best solution in the market, at least here in Mexico. My message to customers here is to try it and they'll never be disappointed with this magic box.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner

Senior Solution Architect at Diyar United Company
Has helped us to increase the resiliency and performance of the application
Pros and Cons
- "It has helped us to increase the resiliency of the application and the performance."
- "The technical support has room for improvement."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use it for load balancers.
How has it helped my organization?
It has helped us to increase the resiliency and performance of the application.
What is most valuable?
There are multiple features that I have found to be valuable including load balancing, supply authentication, web for application firewall, and the reverse proxy.
What needs improvement?
The technical support has room for improvement.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability is amazing.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is amazing. There are 1,000 plus employees that are using it. Anybody from the CEO to the technicians or the receptionists.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. We only required one staff member for the deployment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
You get the value for your money. There aren't any hidden fees.
What other advice do I have?
It's one of the best application delivery controllers available in the market and it requires very minimal administrative effort to manage it.
I would rate it a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
NetScaler
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about NetScaler. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Pre-Sales at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Offers a superior user experience by delving into the HDX protocol
Pros and Cons
- "Citrix NetScaler offers robust security features, including SmartAccess and customizable policies, making it a reliable choice for safeguarding user data."
- "There is room for improvement regarding the pricing policy for Citrix offices."
What is our primary use case?
I use Citrix NetScaler as a gateway to provide secure access to virtualized desktops and applications.
What is most valuable?
Citrix NetScaler offers robust security features, including SmartAccess and customizable policies, making it a reliable choice for safeguarding user data. The seamless integration with Citrix tools enhances both performance and security, creating a powerful combination for optimal IT environments.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement regarding the pricing policy for Citrix offices. In the past, the gateway was cost-effective, but there has been a shift, and the current pricing seems too high.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Citrix NetScaler for many years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of the solution as a seven out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability of the solution as an eight out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
Tech support for NetScaler can be frustrating. When opening a case, I often spend much time with first-level support, who sometimes lack programming knowledge. The process involves repeating details when the case is escalated to an engineer which causes delays. Overall, I would rate the support as a three out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before using Citrix NetScaler, I had experience with similar products. I recall working with Citrix Gateway for server access, but it involved a server running an application on a Windows server. I have also dabbled a bit with other vendors like F5 for feature integration. However, integrating with Citrix has been challenging as they are not very open to external integrations.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is quite expensive. Regular security audits reveal frequent vulnerabilities, requiring monthly patches.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate Citrix NetScaler as a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Associate General Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Works as a reverse proxy solution and helps with load balancing
Pros and Cons
- "We use the product for load balancing and as a reverse proxy solution."
- "The tool's pricing is a pain point since we have many cheaper alternatives."
What is our primary use case?
We use the product for load balancing and as a reverse proxy solution.
What needs improvement?
The tool's pricing is a pain point since we have many cheaper alternatives.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with the solution for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate Citrix ADM's stability a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate the tool's scalability a seven out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
Citrix ADM has a good tech support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
I rate the solution's deployment an eight out of ten, and was straightforward. It was completed in three weeks.
What was our ROI?
Our customers are mostly medium enterprises.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Citrix ADM a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Implementer
HCI & Citrix Senior Systems Engineer at Teleconsys
Good stability and provides a scalable access gateway
Pros and Cons
- "Its customer support service is good."
- "We face challenges with the solution's firmware upgrades frequently."
What is our primary use case?
I use the solution for its access gateway and endpoint management features to balance services.
What is most valuable?
The solution's most valuable features are low latency, reverse proxy, content switching, and access gateway.
What needs improvement?
We face challenges with the solution's firmware upgrades frequently. They should improve this particular area.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for nine years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the solution's stability as an eight.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a very scalable solution.
How are customer service and support?
The solution's technical support team is good.
How was the initial setup?
The solution's initial setup was straightforward. The deployment takes only a few hours. I rate the process a ten out of ten.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is an enterprise solution. Thus, its costs are reasonable.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend the solution to others and rate it as a ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Vice President (Technology) at Shaligram Infotech LLP
Availability on all devices enables better performance for technology applications
Pros and Cons
- "Available on any device and can be accessed on a wide area network."
- "Deployment is complicated."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for screening access, so certain people have access to certain applications. It's a good solution to deliver applications to users who are located in geographically distinct locations. The product means you can have control and still deliver the applications. We have a partnership with Citrix and I'm technology vice president.
What is most valuable?
I like that the solution can be made available on any device and can be accessed on a wide area network - it allows for better performance for technology applications.
What needs improvement?
The process itself could be improved by making it more flexible because it has become really complicated to deploy. Implementing the application delivery mechanism model system has become more difficult over time and more complicated to handle.
I would like to see a simplification of initials.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for a very long time, since it was first established.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's a scalable solution.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is average, sometimes response times are a little slow.
How was the initial setup?
Deployment takes quite a lot of planning and the cost of implementation is based on the number of users. You need to have clarity about the architecture to get an idea of how long deployment will take.
What other advice do I have?
If a company wants to have a secure environment and they want the performance then this is a good solution.
I would rate this solution a nine out of 10.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
IT Consultant at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Straightforward and basic deployment, excellent scalability, and good stability
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features are for the ADMs and the overall monitoring environment."
- "I would like to see the virtual and desktop license included in the pricing."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case is for troubleshooting how users are experiencing the Citrix environment.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features are for the ADMs and the overall monitoring environment.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see the virtual and desktop license included in the pricing.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Citrix ADM for a number of years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have found the scalability to be acceptable.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward and simple. The installation took about an hour.
What about the implementation team?
I did the installation in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing could be lower. The actual device itself is included in the license, so the fact that you have to license virtual machines on it is the price point that could be lower.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Citrix ADM an eight on a scale of one to ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
System Engeneer at CROC
Good load balancing exchange, simple manual configuration, and automatic deployment
Pros and Cons
- "It is simple for both IT specialists and customers."
- "The technical support could be improved. They do not respond or assist customers in a timely manner."
What is our primary use case?
Citrix ADC is primarily used for load balancing exchange and other internal IT systems.
What is most valuable?
It is simple for both IT specialists and customers. With other products, we cannot leave the customer untrained. We can leave the customer during the early stages using Citrix ADC.
What needs improvement?
The stability of Citrix ADC needs to be improved.
The technical support could be improved. They do not respond or assist customers in a timely manner.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Citrix ADC for approximately eight years.
It is typically deployed on-premises, but it is occasionally deployed on a hybrid cloud.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There have been many crashes since the last build.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Citrix ADC is easy to scale.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is different in every situation. In one case it went very well and quickly other cases it took longer.
Technical support could improve, but it is possible that my issue was complicated.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I am also working with F5, Kemp, Barracuda, Cisco, and NGINX.
Loadbalancer.org is less complex than Citrix. In some cases, our customers do not have an engineer on staff who can support this device.
These customers have a large number of Linux engineers but don't have the money. We suggested using Loadbalancer.org and other open-source tools. Many customers are of different sizes and have different budgets.
How was the initial setup?
The installation is simple for both manual configuration and automatic deployment.
What other advice do I have?
Our company is partners with Citrix and F5 BIG-IP.
I would rate Citrix ADC an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner

Buyer's Guide
Download our free NetScaler Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Product Categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Network Management Applications Web Application Firewall (WAF)Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
HAProxy
NGINX Plus
Fortinet FortiADC
Kemp LoadMaster
Radware Alteon
A10 Networks Thunder ADC
VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Loadbalancer.org
Amazon Elastic Load Balancing
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall
Array APV Series
Akamai Ion
Buyer's Guide
Download our free NetScaler Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What's right for me? Fortinet or Citrix?
- Pulse vADC/vTM vs. Netscaler
- Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
- When evaluating Application Delivery Controllers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Comparison Between Kemp LoadMaster and Load Balancer.org
- Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
- What are your daily F5 BIG-IP LTM use cases?
- Why do I need an ADC solution?
- What is the best ADC solution?
- Why is Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) important for companies?