Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pros and cons

Vendor: Quest Software

4.4 out of 5

20 reviews
90% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] offers real-time server data snapshots, reliable cross-platform backup, and secure data transfer via built-in encryption. Valued for point-in-time recovery and VMware integration, it includes VM standby and fast recovery features. However, it lacks folder and file backup, supports only virtual snapshots, and requires manual interventions during system restarts. Technical support and deployment configuration need enhancements, and incremental data space management is inefficient, causing increased usage.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] offers real-time replication for servers, ensuring instant data availability and recovery capabilities.

It guarantees 100% restoration across any platform, providing reliable backup and versatility.

The built-in encryption ensures data security during transfers between on-site and off-site locations.

The compression and deduplication features help save on storage costs, enhancing efficiency.

Its integration with VMware allows seamless creation of replica sets, optimizing disaster recovery strategies.

CONS

Quest Rapid Recovery can only backup machines or disks, but it lacks the ability to back up from folders and individual files.

The backup process uses all server memory resources, which requires improvement.

A scheduled configuration backup option is missing.

There is no mechanism for backing up clustered virtual volumes.

Incremental data management can be enhanced to better manage space usage.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Pros review quotes

Sales Engineer at BAKOTECH LLC

Aug 4, 2019

The best feature of the solution is the user interface.

Read full review

IT Manager at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 19, 2019

The fact that it can take a snapshot of everything on a server and replicate it on another server in real-time is the most valuable feature.

Read full review

Senior Systems Engineer at Ministry of Awqaf & Islamic Affairs

Aug 25, 2019

The solution offers a 100% guarantee that if it's backed up you will be able to restore it onto any platform you want.

Read full review

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Free Report: Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MC

Infrastructure Analyst at a retailer with 501-1,000 employees

Sep 29, 2019

The general backup for replication and virtual standby are the most valuable aspects. It does what it says it does. It's a decent tool for not a big budget.

Read full review

IT Manager at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Nov 21, 2019

The solution's most valuable aspect is its ability to back up a physical server to another physical or virtual server.

Read full review

Systems Administrator at a performing arts with 11-50 employees

Apr 13, 2021

Just knowing that the data is easily recoverable is our ROI. It definitely lowers risk.

Read full review

GR

ICT Network Manager at St Christopher's School Hove

Jun 24, 2021

Built-in encryption helps to secure our data as it travels from our on-site server to our off-site backup server.

Read full review

Systems and Network Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Jun 14, 2021

Probably the point-in-time recovery is most valuable. The other piece that is really nice is that you can mount a whole server at any point in time. So, you can mount the server with all the drives to a Z drive or something like that. It will just mount it all up, and your data is accessible right there on one drive, which is nice.

Read full review

MH

Mohd Hisyamudin Hamid

System Engineer at Netwitz Sdn Bhd

Jun 20, 2021

The compression and deduplication features have helped to save on storage costs.

Read full review

IT Admin at LDV, Inc.

Aug 10, 2021

The local mount utility is most valuable. I do restores fairly regularly. Thankfully, I have not ever lost an entire server that I've had to resurrect, but I certainly have people who erroneously saved over a file or have deleted a file. So, we've done that quite a bit. We still have the DL4000 appliance, and we had, kind of, extrapolated that out over a five-year period. Now, we're in year six, so we had to add storage, which we did as a SAN next to DL4000, but prior to adding in that extra storage, we, here and there, would run into situations where for whatever reason, it would want to be pulling a new base image, and then we would run out of storage. So, we would utilize the archive feature and archive the old data that we want to hang on to, but we don't necessarily need it taking up current data storage. Being able to export out really old data is most valuable to us. Then, we just store that on a NAS that we keep in another building.

Read full review

Show 8 more reviews (out of 18)

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Cons review quotes

Sales Engineer at BAKOTECH LLC

Aug 4, 2019

Rapid Recovery can only backup the machine or disc, but it can't back up from folders, and files, and things like that.

Read full review

IT Manager at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Aug 19, 2019

You can only take a snapshot from a virtual environment. It should have the ability to take snapshots from both a virtual and physical environment.

Read full review

Senior Systems Engineer at Ministry of Awqaf & Islamic Affairs

Aug 25, 2019

Sometimes, when we have certain batches for Windows, it needs to be restarted. When it's restarted, the service is configured as a delayed start. Sometimes, you need to wait too long until it rights itself, or you have to do it manually.

Read full review

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Free Report: Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MC

Infrastructure Analyst at a retailer with 501-1,000 employees

Sep 29, 2019

It's buggy. That's a big problem. We're arranging to get rid of it. We're going to switch to Veeam.

Read full review

IT Manager at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Nov 21, 2019

The on-premises deployment model shouldn't have a maintenance fee. If there's going to be technical support, they need it to be free or it should be paid on upon adopting the solution.

Read full review

Systems Administrator at a performing arts with 11-50 employees

Apr 13, 2021

The terminology didn't seem easily available. When I go to the website, it is hard to search for things. You get all the articles, then you finally get the search button. They need the search at the top of the knowledge base. Then, on occasion, if you get an error message in the system, which is very important, it says, "Click here for more information," but I never get more information. The search engine doesn't find it or it is some weird error. It has never worked for me.

Read full review

GR

ICT Network Manager at St Christopher's School Hove

Jun 24, 2021

When you do a full backup, all of the memory resources on the server are used, which is something that should be improved.

Read full review

Systems and Network Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Jun 14, 2021

For the most part, it is really good in terms of flexibility and choice of recovery methods. What we found lacking was being able to back up virtual volumes that are clustered. We ran out of luck there. There should be an option for backing up clustered virtual volumes.

Read full review

MH

Mohd Hisyamudin Hamid

System Engineer at Netwitz Sdn Bhd

Jun 20, 2021

It is quite surprising to me that the configuration cannot be backed up automatically, and I think that Rapid Recovery should have an option for scheduled configuration backup.

Read full review

IT Admin at LDV, Inc.

Aug 10, 2021

I don't really think that there is a whole lot that needs to be changed. It would be nice if you could deploy the agent without having to reboot. When I upgraded my core to the latest version, I also wanted to update all of my servers, but I had to put that off because I can't just shoot it out there. I have to make sure it is at a time when I can do a reboot right away.

Read full review

Show 8 more reviews (out of 18)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Backup and Recovery

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Commvault Cloud vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Rubrik vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

HPE Zerto Software vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Cohesity DataProtect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Veritas NetBackup vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Azure Backup vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

NetVault Plus vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Iron Mountain Connect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Aranda Data Safe vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Backup and Recovery

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Commvault Cloud vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Rubrik vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

HPE Zerto Software vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Cohesity DataProtect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Veritas NetBackup vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Azure Backup vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

NetVault Plus vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Iron Mountain Connect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Aranda Data Safe vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

See all alternatives

Related questions

49

Software replication to remote sites during disaster recovery?

112

When evaluating backup and recovery software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

52

Veeam vs. Dell AppAssure vs. ShadowProtect

69

Help! Need an opensource backup solution to work with OVM, Linux, Windows, Sql server, Exchange, Sharepoint. Plus bare metal recovery.

42

What will be the best strategy for develop a up to date BCRS?

61

CommVault vs. EMC NetWorker vs. Dell vRanger

306

Should I get a third-party backup solution for Office 365?

67

What is the best next generation backup tool?

36

Best backup for 100Gbps+ read and write with hardware encryption?

58

Do you have an RFP template for Backup Solutions which you can share?