We use Radware Kubernetes WAF to protect our web applications from web-based attacks like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. It provides an integrated web with load balancers but does not have a separate web application.
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
Radware Kubernetes WAF protects our web applications from web-based attacks like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. It provides automation capabilities. For example, if a DDoS attack is happening, it automatically recognizes the attack and prevents it accordingly. Radware Kubernetes WAF provides automation that is effective in dealing with security threats.
What needs improvement?
If Radware provides a separate web service like those offered by vendors such as F5 and Imperva, that would be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
How are customer service and support?
I opened lots of cases regarding Radware Kubernetes WAF, and they resolved all kinds of queries.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very easy to deploy. Deployment, at times, depends on customer requirements, but it can be done in a couple of hours.
What was our ROI?
Radware Kubernetes WAF provides a cost-effective price.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Radware Kubernetes WAF is less costly compared to F5.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The competitors of Radware Kubernetes WAF that I have used include F5 and Imperva.
What other advice do I have?
I would give Radware Kubernetes WAF a rating of 10 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
