Skype for Business Reviews

Skype is mainly used for our internal meetings. We have it set up for all the different groups in the company, whether it's my IFC, the marketing team, pre-sales team, senior leadership, etc. We're using the product at least once a day and everybody in the company uses it. We're customers of Skype and I'm the manager of global business development. 

The calling features are the most valuable, especially now as we are working remotely  because of this pandemic. The screen sharing aspect is also a valuable feature. For example, if we need to explain something internally or deliver a presentation internally, being able to share the screen is a huge benefit. We also use Google Meet for that, so it's dual usage for us.

We have issues with the Skype bandwidth, particularly for external meetings, which is why we also use Google Meet. Also, the sound quality of Skype is not great - there is a constant background humming noise. Clarity is essential, especially in our planning meetings. We can't rely on Skype for that and that's why we sometimes use Google Meet instead. 

I've been at this company for three months and that's how long I've been using the solution. 

The system is somewhat stable although there's the issue of the background noise and it's not always clear who is talking. Following the flow of a meeting can become a bit tricky when a lot of people are involved.

The solution is scalable in that we can sometimes have up to 30 people participating in a meeting. 

We currently use both Skype and Google Meet. Google Meet is very user friendly with good voice quality. We can record our calls and then share screens when we're making a presentation. It's an easier solution than Skype even though we use both platforms. 
For our external client meetings we use Google Meet and internally we use Skype. 

I would rate this solution a six out of 10. 

We use Skype for hosting meetings that are internal to the organization.

Pre-COVID, we did not use it as much as we do now. Post-COVID, however, all of my staff meetings are now done through the visual interface.

I use the chat feature to communicate with my staff, which is very helpful. I'm in a different area of the building than my support team, so a lot of my communications, rather than me running down to their offices or calling them, can be done with Skype.

Going forward, I would like to see better call quality and reliability.

I have been using Skype for Business since I joined UNCF two years ago.

Different parts of our organization were using Skype and Zoom, and we are trying to standardize the use of solutions for virtual meetings. Zoom is being used for external communication, and Skype for Business is being used internally.

Microsoft Teams is replacing Skype for business and we have also used Amazon Chime.

All of these solutions are different audiences. The first category is internal communications and collaboration, and that would be Skype and Teams. In the next tier, you have external meetings, webinars, and conferences of medium-sized scale. These are within the Zoom realm. Finally, you have virtual events such as registrations and breakout rooms. Although Zoom has that capability, the scale is different, which is where Chime and some of the other products come in.

The tier that Teams and Skype for Business are in, suits that tier. Skype is not about conferences, large meetings, webinars, and the like. It is for people working together online, sharing information, transferring files, and changing the screens depending on who is presenting. It's a collaborative remote use case.

The cost of Skype for Business is incorporated into our Office 365 licenses.

Microsoft Teams is slated to replace Skype and Skype for Business. It will have a more seamless interface between it and Outlook and the Office 365 suite. It is feature-rich and includes things like a whiteboarding capability. It is easy to use and ties together far more manageable and sophisticated collaboration tools.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

We primarily use Skype for Business for meetings and internal discussions.

The ability to mute everyone else is pretty useful when there is a large audience. It is more stable, and the video quality is better compared to other communication platforms.

The video quality could be improved, possibly due to internet connection issues. However, there is no significant weakness in Skype for Business.

We have been using Skype for Business for about a year or so.

Skype for Business is stable without experiencing crashes, unlike Teams, which crashes occasionally during meetings.

Skype for Business offers good scalability and does not crash when the number of audience members increases.

Skype support is responsive. I would rate their support around seven to eight.

Positive

Our internal IT team handled the installation of Skype for Business on my system.

Skype for Business is affordable and has decent pricing. The video quality is a bit lower than Teams or Zoom, but it remains a good solution overall.

We use Microsoft products for our business processes. We also use Teams and Zoom for meetings.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I use the solution to make calls and talk to colleagues. I use it mostly to chat with people inside the company and make international calls. 

The product helps me make international calls. 

I feel that the whole look and feel of Skype should be improved, including its user-friendliness. It should also improve its scalability.  

The tool is not stable since some calls just don't get through. I would rate it a five out of ten since it doesn't happen every time. 

I would rate the solution's scalability a three out of ten. My company has 200 users for it. 

I have used Teams before. 

The product's setup is not complex and takes around three hours to complete. 

I would rate the solution a six out of ten. You can use the product without any training. However, I feel that Teams is better than Skype in terms of scalability, user experience, app integration, etc. 

Our primary use case is for virtual meetings and video communication. We also use it to send files via the group chat. I'm a data analyst and we are customers of Skype.

I think it's a good solution and provides us with a good option for virtual meetings. I've never had any problems.

The stability is sometimes a bit wobbly and could be improved. 

I've been using this solution for a year. 

The stability is fine but there is some room for improvement. 

We previously used Zoom and we also had an in-house messaging system developed within the company. 

I wasn't involved in the initial setup, deployment was carried out by our IT department and the company has around 150 users. 

I rate the solution eight out of 10. 

We use the solution for online meetings with our internal and external clients.

The most valuable features are the history tracking which allows us to see who participated and who didn't in the meetings as well as the integration with Outlook.

I have been using the solution for 11 months.

I give the stability an eight out of ten.

The solution is scalable. We have 800 people in our organization using the solution.

The initial setup is straightforward.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

The solution has been discontinued by Microsoft.

I use Skype for Business for communication.

The most valuable feature of Skype for Business is overall it is an okay solution.

I have been using Skype for Business for approximately two years.

Skype for Business is not stable.

The scalability of Skype for Business is not very good.

We have approximately 10 to 15 users using this solution in my organization.

Skype for Business is easy to use and we did not need to contact the support.

I previously used Microsoft Messenger, which is now merged into Skype for Business.

We have 10 engineers and managers that do the deployment and support of solutions.

Our company pays for a license for us to use the solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Skype for Business a six out of ten.

Skype For Business is primarily used for meetings, video meetings, and instant chats.

I use it for one-on-one meetings, not for conference meetings where you have been personally invited.

What is most valuable about Skype for Business is that almost everyone knows about it and almost everyone has it. You will be able to reach a large number of people.

It fulfills all requirements.

I am not familiar with all of the features or whether they can hold conferences because we use Zoom for that. But, in my opinion, if they can do something similar to what Zoom is doing, it will be a complete solution.

I have been using Skype for Business for three years.

Skype for Business is a stable product.

If I include the clients for the various events, there are a few hundred users.

I have never contacted technical support.

Previously, I did not use another solution.

It was easy to install.

The installation was complete in a few minutes.

I completed the installation myself.

There are no licensing fees, but you must use a Microsoft account.

I would rate Skype for Business a nine out of ten.