Splunk Enterprise Security Reviews

We use the solution to build correlation searches around insider threats and exultation of data. We also use it for DLP (data loss prevention) and to get more visibility on what's happening in our environment that could increase risk.

The solution's data aggregation has allowed our organization to unify a lot of inputs from various tools in one space and to be able to search from there.

The solution's most valuable feature is risk-based alerting, focusing on building out user risks for individuals throughout the enterprise.

It is important to our organization's security that Splunk Enterprise Security provides end-to-end visibility into our environment.

Splunk Enterprise Security's ability to find any security event across multi-cloud, on-premises, or hybrid environments is good. It's more about how you configure it and how well your company is equipped to provide and allocate resources to make the best use of the tool.

It has helped reduce our mean time to resolve.

The tool should include more real-world use case examples built out either through videos or in the community. These should not just be examples of how it can be implemented but of how previous solutions have been transitioned to new solutions and how they provide a different and better approach.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for one to three years.

Splunk Enterprise Security is a very stable solution.

The solution’s scalability is based on the cost.

Splunk Enterprise Security is just a tool you can use, and then it's really up to the customer how they leverage it best.

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

We use it in our company to log everything. We use tools like XSOAR to take appropriate actions to mitigate threats.

Splunk Enterprise Security has aided our organization in the way it provides great visibility and helps with what our company's users do with it.

I like how easy it is to integrate the logging of all of the various nodes. The product also offers nice connectors. Other features include the product's ability to allow users to customize their dashboards, signatures, metrics, and other elements, making it a very valuable and reliable tool for my organization.

I don't know if there is a need for any improvements in the product since it is one of my peers and not me who is directly responsible for Splunk Enterprise Security in our company, so I will have to ask him if there are any requirements associated with the product.

The price may be an area of concern where improvements are required. Splunk Enterprise Security doesn't indulge in whitewashing, but Cisco does it too much.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for two years.

I have not seen any outages in the product in the past two years that it has been running in our company, so I think it is good when it comes to the stability part. I have had an experience with the vendor during which there were two products, one from the vendor and the other from Splunk Enterprise Security, and we saw that one of them was not able to capture all the logs appropriately, after which our company had to figure out whether it was Splunk API or the vendor's tool.

I have never used the product's customer support. My peer has contacted the product's technical support team, and it has worked very well for him.

My company used to use one of the spin-offs from IBM. My organization has used IBM QRadar.

Though I am not sure about the deployment model, I feel that since it may not be on Azure, the product must be deployed with the help of AWS.

I have experienced an ROI revolving around the product's dashboards, metrics, and other such related stuff, but I don't know how to quantify them. My peer would be the best person to speak about the product's ROI.

My peer would be aware of the product's pricing part.

There was a pre-vendor selection approach my company followed, but I don't remember the names of the products involved.

It is pretty important how the solution provides end-to-end visibility in our company's environment because it provides opportunities for shadow IT and for people to do things that they should be doing. If one is appropriately logging in, the product gives us a view and helps our company discover things that we didn't know about.

In terms of Splunk Enterprise Security's ability to help our company find any security events across multi-cloud, on-prem, or hybrid environments, I will have to say that since we are still using it, it has to be effective. If it wasn't effective in the aforementioned area, my peer would have found something else in the product. I don't have enough personal insight into Splunk Enterprise Security's ability to help our company find any security events across multi-cloud, on-prem, or hybrid environments.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped to reduce my company's alert volume. Our organization does get alerts, and we are trained for them. I will have to ask my peer to give me the exact number associated with the alerts my company receives.

The solution provides the relevant context that helps guide our company's investigations. The context information has impacted our company's investigation process as it definitely speeds it up because we have only a single source from which we can get that, and it helps us understand what may have taken place in a particular incident that we are looking at in our organization. In our company, if we look at any of the other services, we can see whether a particular or specific user touched just a single system or ten different systems.

The solution has helped reduce my company's mean time to resolve, but I don't have numbers to explain it.

The reason why I rate the tool a nine is because of the flexibility it provides to go back to the dashboards. The flexibility to be able to customize standard dashboards and other standard things that I want to be able to grab and have them pop out and then be able to create some sort of an action against those kinds of things that I want, of which the first is the standard reporting part, which is very valuable.

To those planning to use the solution, I would suggest that they need to get Splunk to work hard on the pricing part. People also need to encourage Splunk to stay true to its roots because I have seen what has happened to some of the other tools in the market. Splunk has been acquired by Cisco. You want Splunk because of its capabilities, not because of what Cisco wants to give you.

If I consider my company's needs, I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.

The visibility that it provides is awesome. You can connect it to whatever you want and create whatever visibility you want. 

Its insider threat detection capabilities for helping our organization find unknown threats and anomalous user behavior are great. They have a lot of built-in capabilities for analytics, and they can provide a lot of visualizations and insights into whatever is being brought into it. The threat intelligence that is part of the platform itself is awesome.

In terms of actionable intelligence, it depends on what you bring to the table. The platform itself gives you the capability to make threat intelligence actionable, but if your feed is not good, it is of no use. There is a lot of noise within the SIEM. This is not on Splunk. This is on the SIEM, but Splunk does help to eliminate a bit of the noise and create a more cohesive view of the intelligence you digest.

Splunk is very good for analyzing malicious activities and detecting breaches. Its ability to connect things that are manually hard to connect is awesome. It is a bit lacking when you compare it to Microsoft Sentinel because Microsoft Sentinel already brought the SOAR solution, which in the case of Splunk comes at an additional cost. When I used it, they did have it quite expensive, but as a SIEM, if you compare Splunk to other SIEMs, it provides you with a great ability to detect and understand that you have something that is suspicious and anomalous within your network. Its ability to connect us to that otherwise cannot be connected by humans is very good.

It helps to detect threats faster, but I do not have the metrics. When it comes to reducing the alert volume, it is not Splunk. It is more of the analyst's work on top of Splunk.

Splunk definitely helps speed up our security investigations. It has the ability to connect and bring information with the click of a button. 

I have used Threat Topology and MITRE ATT&CK framework. It was very good for management but not so much for analysts' day-to-day work. It is a cool feature that helps you bring money from management, but it is not something that an analyst will use on a day-to-day basis.

The ability to digest any information and then correlate it in accordance with what you need is valuable. The ability to connect to pretty much everything and bring the information in the same format is also valuable. On top of that, we can use their language in order to create and customize the dashboards, correlations, or analytics that we want to incorporate. They also have a lot of out-of-the-box correlation that we can use, which is awesome.

They can incorporate the SOAR solution within the actual product so that we do not require two different products, two different installations, and two different pricing methods. In regards to UBA, I am familiar with the UBA that existed two years ago. I am not updated about it today, but two years ago, UBA required such an amount of data that from a cost perspective, it was not worth it. When you compare it to what you get out of the box with Microsoft Sentinel without additional costs, there is no match. 

I have been working with it for the past five or six years. 

It is very stable. I did not have any crashes or malfunctions. It does have a bit of a stretching point when you are doing a very large query or you are retrieving a lot of data. For example, when you are retrieving months of logs in order to conduct an investigation. However, that is at the edge of the product. On a day-to-day basis, it is very stable. It does everything that you need to do. We did not have any crashes in either of our implementations. We did not have anything major.

In the on-prem environment, it is scalable, but it requires work because you need to install indexes and forwarders. It requires more work from someone who is specialized in that domain, but in the cloud environment, it is super easy. It is very scalable. You can just grow as you need.

Their support is awesome. I would rate them a ten out of ten. It is not just the technical support. Their documentation is also good. The whole support system is awesome.

Positive

I used it in my last organization. In my current organization, we have adopted Microsoft Sentinel. I am creating a new managed service company, so it is going to provide service to multiple clients. We have multi-tenancy and full cloud environments and monitoring of on-prem solutions. When I implemented Splunk, it was not used for multi-tenancy. Their multi-tenancy was not that great. It was the old solution, but they now have the cloud environment that is more supportive of multi-tenancy, but with their on-prem solution, for multi-tenancy, we could just play with permissions. It was not the best. It was not proper multi-tenancy where you need different databases and different control planes. It was not the ideal solution, but now they have the cloud environment.

The experience that I had a few years ago was for on-prem, but now, I do have an implementation that is cloud-based. We are implementing it cloud-based for one of our customers. It is deployed on AWS.

The initial deployment is very fast. It is very quick. The on-prem can take a few days, and it is up and running. If it is on the cloud, it is already installed. You only need to connect all the source logs. The duration depends on the number of source logs. It differs. I had a project where I connected all my source logs in one week, and I had a project that took about four months, but the number of logs was different. The complexity was different. We had to create our own connectors and our own parsers.

The pricing is very complicated, and it is very pricey. You do require a lot of different licenses in order to get a comprehensive solution that is not just the SIEM solution.

To someone who is evaluating SIEM solutions but wants to go with the cheapest solution, I would recommend QRadar.

Overall, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten. There are several reasons for not rating it a nine or a ten because the pricing is very complicated, and it does require someone who is knowledgeable in the platform. You need someone who is specialized in that. Fortunately, I have these people, but when I tried to look for one in the beginning, it was not an easy job to find someone who was very skilled in this platform. Once you have such a person, it is awesome. You can do whatever you want. The sky is the limit. In fact, not even the sky is the limit. It does provide a very comprehensive solution. It does provide tons of flexibility. It is the platform that you should go for when you need something that is not ordinary or not your typical SIEM solution for a typical organization. It is the platform when you need something that will provide more. For example, one of the projects that I worked on was related to a SOC that needed to digest information from multiple organizations that already digest information, and we had to create cohesive use of that. In such a case, this is the platform to work with because it provides the flexibility that no one else provides.

We primarily use the solution for monitoring, intrusion detection, and prevention. It is mostly a lot of security and network and server monitoring.

It automated the way we look at intrusion detection and prevention. It automatically picks up intrusion attempts within our environment.

The monitoring and the security functionality are the most valuable aspects of the solution.

It is easy to set up.

It is very scalable. 

You can basically make it do whatever you want, from log management and monitoring security, intrusion detection, prevention, and linking to your antivirus to report to it. Having kind of a single point where everything feeds in and create dashboards however you like is useful and works with how many ever systems you want in that dashboard.

I've not come across any areas that need improvement.

I'd like to see more integration with more antivirus systems.

We've used the solution for roughly, one year and a half years.

The solution is highly scalable.

We have four people that use the solution and they were split between infrastructure and security.

We don't have a plan to increase usage as we're almost at capacity with our servers, for our purposes. I don't think we're going to scale it as we're using everything we can from anything we need. However, it's intensely used for security purposes.

Technical support is perfect.

Positive

The initial setup was straightforward. It was done by Splunk entirely. After that, the configuration took a bit of time, however, we bought professional service days from them to help us build the configuration.

The full deployment took about five months due to the fact that we have quite a lot of servers.

I'd rate the experience a five out of five in terms of ease of execution. 

The amount of people you require for deployment and maintenance depends on the complexity of the environment. It can be run and managed by a single person if the environment is not highly complex. If you're talking about probably less than 200 servers, and a couple of network endpoints, one person can manage it easily after it's been configured. Otherwise, I wouldn't be able to say. In more complex environments where you've got several geographical locations, several data centers in geographical locations, and so on, you'd probably need more than one.

Splunk handled the implementation. It was a joint effort between them bringing the knowledge and us doing the actual work.

It's a great investment, especially if you want to strengthen your security stance.

It's yearly a yearly license on a three-year contract. On a three-year contract, you get a discount basically - rather than putting it on a rolling yearly contract.

On pricing, if I base it on the functionality of the system out of the box, I would rate it five out of five.

They have several prepackaged modules you can purchase. For example, for the security type, they have Security Enterprise, with the default products getting security essentials. With Infrastructure, the same. We've got an ITOps enterprise, which again, is payable on top of the standard license. 

It's pretty much how much you can actually build in-house. The difference between AT&T, LogRhythm, and Splunk, while AT&T and LogRhythm are pretty out of the box (it's click and configure), Splunk is highly configurable. 

You can make it do whatever you want to, as long as you know how to edit the configuration files. What ITOps and Security Enterprise do, instead of you having to build all that from the ground up, so the dashboards, the logic behind it, the configuration files, and so on, become prepackaged and pre-installed.

We did test AT&T and LogRhythm as well. We chose this solution as a balance between cost and functionality.

AT&T was a great security tool, however, it lacked a lot of the infrastructure things that Splunk does, in terms of server monitoring and network monitoring. LogRhythm did have a dose, however, at a very prohibitive price. It was almost twice the cost of Splunk.

We've got a version of Splunk Cloud. I'm not sure of which version.

I'd advise users to get more professional service days. You get five professional service days with the product, when you buy the license, usually. Definitely get at least ten more.

You need to have some strategy before. You definitely need a strategy. Before you do your PS days, definitely have a look at your strategy and make sure you've arranged your questions rather diligently. Based on how you think you're going to use the system, where you are where you want to be, just box them into separate parts - security, infrastructure, and monitoring. It's going to make life a lot easier when you talk to consultants as the consultants are very, very knowledgeable. However, you need to ask the right questions.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

Our primary use cases are for detection and remediation.

The benefits we've seen from Splunk is that we can promote it to our customers. The second benefit is that it works. It does what it's purported to do, and the support is more than adequate. 

The most valuable feature is that it brings all of the components necessary to identify, analyze, and respond together.

It's pretty important that Splunk provides end-to-end visibility into your environment. As in any product that one purchases to fulfill a function, we want to recognize where it came in, who it affected, and what the challenges are that need to be met in order to resolve something, both immediately and also to make sure that it doesn't replicate in the future. Splunk does a good job of being able to do the former half. Dealing with issues requires tier-three support and above and it takes time. You can work through it with the help of your vendor team.

I would rate them an eight out of ten. It's not so much the problem of the application itself, although there are always improvements that can be done. There are a lot of moving parts that need to be added in and if you don't have the information that you need, especially within identity and inventory, then that can be an added challenge when you have to start making imprints based on what you do know.

Splunk Enterprise Security provides us with the relevant context to help guide our investigations. There are a number of different standards that can be presented, which is beneficial. Some customers like to have the information that they receive in one format. The driving factor is that when you work with federal customers, some of them want it in one format. The response will be in one format as opposed to another. 

Splunk has helped to improve my company's business resilience. It's an active component in ensuring that we are vigilant against intrusion and detecting it.

Splunk is such a large product. Allowing it to be more easily used by people who have not had a lot of training on it would be an improvement. That's something that they're accomplishing with their current version, although I haven't had an opportunity to learn much about it. With AI capabilities coming on board, a lot of that will alleviate the minutiae that people need to know in order to resolve problems as they come up.

Splunk's ability to predict, identify, and solve problems in real-time is a work in progress.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for the past four years.

Aside from the fact that it can be a resource hog, I'm satisfied with the stability. I don't have too many problems except for a few occasions when we have a threat intelligence file blow up a drive because there's not enough room. It might be because a complete configuration has not been implemented. 

I like the fact that it can be tweaked, but a lot of the various configurations for how long data is held or how long particular components of investigation are held. 

I encourage users to use the vendor management team and cultivate a relationship with them. I have worked with companies who had support that I would rate 11 out of 10. I would rate Splunk an eight out of ten because as any large growing company, they have challenges with keeping the talent necessary, who are not only educated to evaluate a problem and pass it on or solve it themselves.

Positive

The largest challenge with the setup is that it has so many different components. The environment that we're in is a multi-tenant. Enterprise Security with all of its components is huge. If you're using something like a deployment server you can't break it up. It makes it rather unwieldy. I'm sure that there are workarounds that have not been implemented in-house.

Splunk provides more than the people who pay for it realize. I had a few exercises in presenting ROI and benefit-cost analysis and I have been able to demonstrate where it has performed superior to other options.

I was deeply distressed when they went away from their perpetual license.

We evaluated Splunk's typical competitors. We went with Splunk because Splunk has the underlying capability of not only ingesting anything and storing it using their bloom filters and whatnot in order so that you can do sparse and large searches relatively quickly. It also has a wonderful presentation layer, which can basically plug into many other systems. I find Splunk to be a veritable Swiss Grey knife of capabilities.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten because there's always room for improvement and because it can be difficult to learn.

Our primary use case is to find brute-force attempts on our systems. 

We use it for security purposes, to find malicious activity, and to find misusage of our business platform.

The main benefits we have from Splunk Enterprise Security are the alerts with which we can manage the searches and the notables which can be good for documentation.

Identity management is the most valuable feature. 

Its ability to find any security event across any environment is useful if you use the risk parameter. If it can correlate with an identity or an asset, then correlations between such events are up to the analyst. 

Splunk Enterprise Security helped improve our organization’s ability to ingest and normalize data.

Splunk helped to reduce our alert volume by 53%. We work based on an on-call process. The analyst who is on call can use Enterprise Security to see what alerts they have and work from there.

If you load it correctly, Splunk will provide us with the relevant context to help guide our investigations. It made it easier. 

Splunk Enterprise Security helped improve our organization's business resilience.

In terms of its ability to create, identify, and solve problems in real-time, if the problem arises, we can go and look at Splunk, but if it's happening in real time and no one reports the issue, then it doesn't work in real time. 

It helps consolidate networking, security, and IT observability tools but it doesn't have such a big impact on our company. 

It should work better out of the box and have better use cases that would not require my intervention. For example, if I install an antivirus and endpoint protection on my computer, I don't need to do much. But to get any value from Splunk, I need to work hard on it. 

In the next release, they should include machine learning-based rules that would streamline the process of finding anomalies.

For real-time detection, I would not say that Splunk is the best. If you experience a problem and go to Splunk to look at the dashboard, then it's in real-time. Because of the way Splunk works, I wouldn't get an alert in real-time. 

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for five years. 

On newer servers, it can be stable. On our servers, it can take a while. We need to re-enter when we press selections. 

It is scalable. You can add more servers and analysts. 

Support depends on the issue. Sometimes they help but most of the time, I have to solve the issue on my own. 

I would rate support a six out of ten. Usually, it can take time until I get to someone who can help. The diagnostics aren't always accurate. I once had an issue where they replaced a certificate that we weren't using, so it didn't solve the problem. It can take a few iterations to solve the problem.

Neutral

The deployment is fine for me, but it is not really straightforward. I would suggest simplifying the process. For example, the whole certificate part is not secured by default. I would recommend fixing that.

We used EMET Computing for the integration. They are fine. 

We do see ROI. We can deduce the ROI from finding the damage that misusing our business platform is causing. 

I think that the price can be too high sometimes, especially for the cloud. We get a lot of logs that are meaningless. For example, if we are using a firewall, we get a message for every session or packet. A lot of those connections are the same. We pay a lot of money on the license and on logs that are the same. If there was a way to aggregate them, the cost of the license would be reduced.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a six out of ten. It is useful but it doesn't add that much value on top of standard Splunk. Because of our use cases and environment, we don't use all of the features it has. Nevertheless, the value it provides isn't so different from Splunk Core.

We usually use the solution for the same functionality, which includes setting up alerting and making notables. We also use it for the workflow from ingestion, alerting, and response.

Splunk Enterprise Security serves as our SIEM, providing security alerts, operational alerts, and even some logging that we probably need to check in on from time to time. It basically serves as an alerting platform for our enterprise.

The solution's most valuable feature is the criticality of alerts. Some alerts can be noise, and others will be more high-level and warrant a higher-level response than others.

The solution's automation could be improved. It would be better if we could automate ingesting and alerting for low-level events.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for seven to ten years.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

For the times I've had to set up incidents from critical to lower ones, the technical support team has been fairly responsive. Sometimes, the support team has had a two to three-hour turnaround time for critical incidents. Usually, you would like to get to someone sooner rather than later for critical incidents.

Positive

I've previously used other SIEM tools like ArcSight, QRadar, and Elastic Security.

We have seen a return on investment with the solution.

The solution helps us see what's actually happening in our environment. Some things we might not expect at times, and others we do expect. The tool helps us respond based on what we see from our logs. I've seen and thoroughly liked some AI, automation, and single-pane-of-glass updates coming to the solution.

It is very important to our organization that Splunk Enterprise Security provides end-to-end visibility into our environment. You can't respond to what you can't see was ingested. So, the visibility provided by the tool into our logs and alerting environment is critical.

From an ingestion point of view, the solution alerts you to what you'd tell it to. It's pretty agnostic log-wise.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve our organization’s ability to ingest and normalize data.

It has helped reduce our alert volume. You're getting the same alerts. You can see what's noise, what's actionable, and what's not as actionable.

Splunk Enterprise Security provides us with the relevant context to help guide our investigations. We see what's coming into the environment, including specific logs that we wouldn't expect as much. All of that gets filtered into alert data, potentially operational data, and sometimes even billing data, so we can adjust and move forward with that in the environment.

Splunk Enterprise Security helped reduce our mean time to resolve by somewhere between 20% to 35%.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve our organization's business resilience for some ingestion purposes.

The unified platform helps consolidate networking, security, and IT observability tools. Splunk is pretty log-agnostic. All of your logs, tools, and sometimes even dashboards can get ingested into one specific tool. That way, you have a single platform where you can view all those logs and respond based on that data.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The solution is primarily for security incident investigation. Whenever a customer wants to monitor the environment for any security incident or events that are occurring, and they want to analyze the incident when virtual issues happen, that's when we propose Splunk. Otherwise, it's difficult to understand what kind of security event is arising in the environment.

The primary feature that is the most valuable is the correlation feature, which helps you analyze the data. If there's a lot of telemetry data at some point, Splunk can take advantage of it. It can handle a large volume of data. 

Now, with big data, AI, and all those things, the amount of security data that is generated is too high. Generally, the other SIMs face trouble when handling big data. However, Splunk itself is a very strong solution for handling lots of data. It helps the SOC team analyze data very well, and it does not crash on handling a large amount. That's a key benefit.

Our customers usually monitor multiple cloud environments. It's not very difficult. There are two ways we use Splunk. One is that they can be multiple cloud environments. The second is that it can be an on-prem and a cloud environment. We are mapping it to our one solution. 

Splunk is very flexible and it's integratable with other solutions

If you want to understand how it can analyze or find out incidents, the visibility is good. The best visibility would always be in the on-prem environment. Then, the cloud, since Splunk is not a native cloud solution like Microsoft's Sentinel, is used. We don't see a lot of challenges if we do a hybrid kind of setup, however.

I'd assess Splunk's insider threat detection capabilities to help find unknown threats or anomalous user behavior at an eight out of ten. Splunk itself uses another agent or another module to do it. Splunk does the job. It's not that it will not do the job; however, it will require more refining than other solutions in the market.

My team uses the Splunk Mission Control, topology, and attach framework features, which are really helpful. We've used it for multiple customers. We take their existing SOC or detection use cases and try to map them to the framework. From a security point of view, it obviously makes a solution more superior. With Splunk, you can catch more security incidents. From a best practice standpoint also, it is a good thing as we can configure the solution, and, according to that configuration, the entire performance is better in terms of security. 

It's very useful for assessing malicious activities or detecting breaches. It's a robust solution. 

We've been able to help customers detect threats faster. It might be 5% to 10% faster in some cases. And since we can analyze large volumes of data, we're not missing any particular data point or data set. That gives us an advantage.

Splunk helps reduce alert volume. You can reduce your alert volume based on your configuration, and it's highly customizable, so it can help you reduce alerts by a lot. It's helped us improve the quality of incidents we receive. 

It's helping customers speed up security investigations somewhat.

It improves the resilience of a company thanks to its ability to quickly analyze data.  

While it's costlier than other solutions, it's highly stable. 

The security orchestration response requires a bit of improvement. 

We'd like to see a more seamless cloud-based integration.

Their mobile features for iOS and Android could be improved in terms of quality of performance. 

I've been using the solution for three and a half years. 

It's a highly stable product even for large customers with diverse environments. For companies that have huge amounts of data even, it does not crash. It's the preferred option when a lot of data is involved. It offers good resilience and improves performance. 

I'd rate the scalability seven out of ten since it is not cloud-native.

Technical support is good. We purchase premium support services.

Positive

I was not involved in the initial setup of the solution. 

The solution is deployed wherever your appliance is. You deploy it where your software team wants to monitor from. Typically, that's headquarters or a company's security center. Splunk then has agents that help devices connect across geographies. For example, while Splunk may be primarily in the UK, it can cover devices via agents across Europe, and the agents can monitor other environments.

We have between two to five people who handle maintenance activities, depending on the client. 

There is a threat intelligence management feature. However, customers don't use it in our case. Typically, customers want something superior in that nature.

Price is a major concern for most customers, big or small. However, price should not be the determining factor when seeking a solution. Users need to think about performance and quality. They need something that will help them prevent security incidents, and they need a product that will be stable. If you can monitor your environment better, you can prevent incidents that may lead to financial loss - and when incidents happen, companies can spend far more dealing with an extended phishing attack than they would on a service like Splunk that will protect them effectively. When it comes to security, while it's not necessary to have the most expensive solution on the market, you should at least seek out a solution that's best suited to your company and its needs.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a great option for enterprise-level companies. However, a smaller customer with a smaller budget may not be a good match. They may not need such a powerful solution in any case. That said, if a customer is about to grow a lot, I might suggest Splunk as a primary option. I'd advise potential users to look at the environment size and complexity, consider the budget, and then decide if Splunk makes sense.