Tidal by Redwood Reviews

We primarily use it for scheduling our JD Edwards ERP software batch jobs.

The solution runs on Windows. It also integrates with our Unix & AIX systems. We use it for automating EDI transactions, so it reaches out to FTP sites as well.

The solution’s drill-down functionality is really good. It can be limited to just seeing a specific job or a group of jobs, depending upon the person's location.

We utilize Tidal for updating other computer systems used within the plants with JD Edwards transactions. This functionality alone saves a lot of time so personnel didn't have to manually run jobs to update the other systems. 

The ease of scheduling is its most valuable feature, and how easy it is to actually schedule something. One of the best things is the calendars and how flexible the calendars can be. Or, you can create your own calendar to match whatever schedule you want or need the job to be run. That is huge for us.

We use the solution for cross-platform, cross-application workloads. The solution’s ability to manage and monitor these workloads is very easy and accurate. We use the job dependencies feature A LOT... meaning one job doesn't start until the last one finished successfully and so on. Another fabulous feature is the file dependencies. A particular job does not start running until a file exists in the location specified but that file is on a completely different server. So, it is cross systems.

It's pretty easy to understand and learn. I did not go through any training for it, we have a test environment so I 'played' a lot there and learned the capabilities of this powerful scheduler. Some guidance as to how the solution is setup and configured today is needed, so users stay within those boundaries. It takes less than half a day (four hours) to onboard new administrators.

I know they are working on improving this already, but there needs to be better reporting. Currently, there are only like three or five reports that we can get off of the system. They already have a solution to this in the new version. I.e., a schedule of all the jobs running for one day, specifically calling out what dependencies that a job relies on. It would be like a flow chart of how the day's jobs would run.

Over 14 years.

The stability is excellent. There are days we don't even log into the product because it just continues to run seamlessly.

We don't have it open to our users and don't actually see a need to do that at this point.

The system administrator is the regular user of the solution. They do the maintenance of the solution, if needed.

We have jobs that run every 2 minutes all throughout the day as well as hourly jobs that run.

Luckily, I haven't had a need to use the technical support.

Except for one time, when Java got accidentally upgraded, and it slowed our performance terribly but they were absolutely amazing and great to work with!

In my past job, I have used HelpSystems Robot. At the time, HelpSystems only ran on an AS/400 or iSeries while the Tidal solution runs on various platforms. They are pretty comparable though for functionality.

It was already at the company when I got here.

We upgraded earlier this year, but we used a business partner (Blue House) because I did not know how to do it.  Since I watched them, I could probably do it myself going forward, as the process was fairly straight forward. We were done within just a couple of hours.

Blue House was great to work with and the process itself was easy. 

We have seen ROI from savings in time. We run on average about 2,200 jobs a day. This is a cost savings for us due to the fact that our users do not have to run these jobs manually since Tidal will do it for them.  As an estimate, this has probably freed up 10 full-time people, in the various departments, about an hour or two a day.

We pay maintenance annually through BlueHouse of about $9,000. That i's for our two environments: production and test and some adapters to integrate with other systems.

My company did evaluate other solutions. They chose Tidal because it was one of two solutions which ran on the hardware that they had at the time, an AIX platform.

It's a great product. I endorse it because it is stable, and that is a big thing for us!

Give it a shot. Get a trial. Test it out. You'll come up with probably the same thing that we did and purchase the product.

I would give it a nine (out of 10). There is a little room for improvement, but overall the solution is exactly what we need and rely on.

This solution does enable admins and users to see the information relevant to them, but we do not have that enabled for our users.

Because we run 24/7/365 and are open all the time, the solution has not really reduced weekend hours for us.

We are mainly using it for triggering data jobs. It does a lot of ITIL stuff and data movement from systems into Hadoop. We use it because it has the capability of dependency triggering or dependency running. That's the main idea behind it. Also, it helps us to centralize and organize jobs across the organization.

We use Tidal to run Hadoop backup system, SAP HANA, and SAP BusinessObjects. We also trigger a lot of jobs into SnapLogic, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Workday, and Tableau, along with a couple of dashboards. We run a couple of batches from our Unix and Windows machines: the stuff that the developers are working on and want to run in ITIL. But, SAP is the main thing.

The main goal is to use Tidal for managing and monitoring cross-platform, cross-application workloads. The ability to manage those loads is what they do well. I can put a job to run in SAP, and once the job ends successfully, I can run that job in Hadoop. Or, I can run that job in Salesforce.

Tidal enables admins and users to see the information relevant to them. We have something like 50 different teams working on our Tidal platform. We segregate between them using work groups. When a user logs into Tidal, they only see what they have permission for, not other projects. Data engineers are the users of this solution.

A user who comes into Tidal, develops his job, and creates their job in Tidal, then triggers the job or sets up a schedule. An admin is someone who keeps the lights on, making sure the platform is up and running. They maintain the solution and configure it, doing upgrades.

If I just want to monitor my job, that is something that the solution does really well because there is some constant job activity that you can login and see what has happened every day and every minute. That is pretty good. An admin can drill down to processes and data, but I don't think they are doing that.

The solution has helped to eliminate weekend hours. In the past, we had to schedule a job every Saturday. Then, someone had to login and run the job. Now, Tidal has the capability of event-driven jobs. For example, if a job is failing, we can do something. Or, if a job is completed abnormally, we can rerun the job. So, all of these features that they offer help us not to come into the office on a Saturday. We don't need to have a human person do those weekend activities and treat them. They also thought a lot of about outages in the product. You can set up an outage to an adapter or connection, to say, "Between these hours on the weekend, I don't want to trigger any jobs." That works very well.

The job dependency is something that you cannot have in a regular, simple cron job or simple scheduler dependency. The event-driven jobs are core for us, as we really need that. Therefore, we really need Tidal with its ability to run thousands of jobs per day.

We started to deploy Azure, and it's still not fully baked. We are struggling with it. It is not something that has worked out-of-the-box. We haven't installed Tidal in the public or private cloud. We have a problem with security. While we can install the entire platform in the cloud to handle separate work or an entity, if we want to centralize it, then it's a little difficult.

They don't have good reporting capabilities. From the user perspective, I have 6,000 jobs running per day, and I would like to track them to know exactly what is going on. E.g. if a manager asks me, "Can you bring me this data or can you do a dashboard or report?" I need to take a lot of actions in order to do that. It's not easy to compute that data.

We are now testing version 6.5. The speed of this console is much better than 6.2, where the speed has not been sufficient for me. 

Most of my users are doing customer service review these days. So, we are asking the customers what they think about Tidal and what the vendor needs to improve. The number one that we are exploring is the user experience (UX). It has a lot of features, which is one thing that is great. On the other hand, the user experience is a bit old. It is hard to find what you're looking for. The UX is not intuitive for all users. So, if I'm a user, it might take me some time to know where I need to find my stuff.

It takes a lot of time to learn the product. I have admins and developers who are working on the products for the last three to four years and still don't know all the functionalities. Tidal has really great things about it, but people are focused on their day-to-day job and the solution is not intuitive.

We have internal training where we do two weeks of training for three hours each day. So it's approximately 30 hours of training. I cannot say after that users know everything. It takes about six months to ramp up on Tidal to be really good and professional.

I have been using it for the last three years.

In version 6.5, it is very stable and works quickly. The UI works quickly too. Their services load pretty fast. If one of the servers reboot, they have a layout of the high availability. This means that from each component of the product you have two items. If one of them goes down, then the other one kicks in and starts to work. I really like that idea.

In terms of room for improvement, if one of the master goes down, then another one takes a minute to start. While it is not a big deal, when you commit on four nines, one minute is huge. So, I'm pushing the vendor all the time to be better on this.

They still haven't implemented the load balancing-oriented thinking. So, if I have two client managers, I cannot put them behind a load balancer. Or, I can put them there, but the load balancer will never have a health check. That is something that everyone is doing, building health checks, and they don't have health checks on clients for load balancing. Maybe this will come in the future. I submitted a request for having a health check for load balancers.

In version 6.2, they had a lot of problems. One of the problems is the Oracle support. We are using Oracle RAC and high availability on Oracle. If one of the databases would suddenly goes down, the entire system would crash. In version 6.5, we have tested this. They have done significant work and it's working perfectly. It's not crashing and working continuously without any issues. From this perspective, I am very happy with the new version.

If you have enough memory, it is scalable. We are running 20,000 jobs. We just increased our memory. It scales really well. 

The North American technical support is very good. They go the extra mile for you all the time, and we are very happy them. We have had some problem in the past with the Asian support during IST time, while it is night in the North America. However, I think it's getting better. Overall, I'm very happy.

We used local solutions, like scheduling for each platform, such as SAP Scheduler, SnapLogic scheduler, and cron jobs. We didn't have a centralized place.

I was the architect of the initial setup. The initial setup was complex; it's not easy. They have a lot of settings and configuration that need to be done. There are a lot of small things that vary from environment to environment, and they fail to consider every situation. 

The deployment takes a couple of days.

With our first environment, we tested it in a sandbox. I let my admin play with it to see how it behaved and what are the downsides. Then, we created a document. While I know that they have a document for installation, every time that we go to install, we are finding new issues.

I'm behind a firewall and we are in a limited environment. Our infrastructure is built differently from what they probably tested on their environment. So, it's a bit different from what I need to install. I first put it on the sandbox to see all the issues that we are facing, document step-by-step what we did, and then I go and do it in stage. Now, stage is the place where the developer come in and develop their jobs. Once they are ready, we move the jobs into production. 

Stage is really almost production. If stage wasn't available, then the developer could not work nor deliver. We see if it works for at least three weeks. If we don't have issues during that time, then we deploy to production. 

They do a better job in version 6.5, which we are testing now.

We have seen return on investment.

BMC is really expensive. The other solutions are about the same price. I think Tidal is even cheaper than the others, such as CA, Stonebranch, and JAMS.

Our licensing model for Tidal is on an annual basis. It is very good and works well for us. Tidal's licensing is very transparent and simple. It lets you know, for the amount you use, that's the price that you pay. So, we buy X number of licenses, and we know that this is where we are. I'm very happy with that. I saw the licensing modules on other platforms, and I didn't like them. Other companies and solutions would calculate the connections, adapters, and instances. I think that's the reason that BMC was pretty expensive: They just didn't understand what our needs are.

The solution has no hidden costs. It helps me to plan forward into the future. I know that I can add another 100 or a thousand jobs, and that's how much it will cost me today.

We did evaluate other schedulers. This was the best solution.

I was not the one who selected it in the first place. I was the one who asked to evaluate a replacement at some point. There was a time when Cisco was the owner and we felt like Cisco was not delivering the product like we wanted. We sought to move to a new solution and assessed different solutions: BMC, CA, Stonebranch, and JAMS. We installed all of them, running all our tests. It took us six months to do our evaluation. Eventually, we found out that they are very similar from the infrastructure side. I could not see any advantage using the other solutions.

We discovered that we are good with Tidal and what we have. Then, a new company acquired Tidal from Cisco and they promised a lot of things to be better. We felt that the solution was going to a better place. So, we decided to wait and see how much they invest on the stability. We have been happy with the results. They are really focused on the customer and our pain. They are trying to remediate everything that we have issues with. Therefore, we decided to stay with them for now.

Don't be afraid. Just do it. You will enjoy the features of it. It is a great tool.

You need to test Tidal many times. It's not straightforward. You need to test and learn it. 

We have something that is not unique to many platforms. I have five guys who handle the platform. That's costly for us. We would like to see the platform more automated or straightforward. I would like to not need to hire so many people just to administrate and maintain the platform. 

Our capacity has increased in terms of the number of jobs and integrations, but that is a natural thing. I don't think it's related to the solution. When you start to develop jobs, then year by year the number of jobs grow because the organization is growing. 

I'm very happy with the product, but it's not a fully baked product. It requires babysitting. I have worked on other solutions and know what is there. This takes time for us to install, upgrade, and task because there are so many components to the product. If you do one little mistake, then you can screw the system.

I would rate the solution as an eight (out of 10).

It enables optimal scheduling of jobs by offering a range of job-associated functions. These functions encompass actions like restarting, resubmitting, terminating, revoking, modifying, pausing, resuming, and activating/deactivating scheduled tasks, all achievable with a single click. 

It helps us to save a lot of time by doing all the repetitive tasks very efficiently with no errors. It serves as a centralized hub for overseeing, scheduling and governing workflows. 

Overall, we can depend on Tidal for the smooth functioning of our tasks.

One of the greatest automation tools for managing a company's workload is Tidal automation. The best thing is that it has a direct connection to the hub of our system, which powers everyday operations for more than 15,000 jobs. By completing all the repetitious chores quickly and accurately, it saves us a lot of time. 

It acts as a center for controlling, planning, and managing workflows, projects, and jobs, and includes, among other things, the ability to schedule tasks, manipulate data, and transfer files.

The solution is an alerting mechanism at best, offering a comprehensive system that diligently provides timely alerts, promptly notifying stakeholders whenever a job teeters on the precipice of failure due to prolonged execution, or inversely, remains suspended in an unexpectedly protracted state, all while ensuring triumphant notifications reverberate through the digital channels upon job completion, fostering an environment of efficient operational oversight.

It's the most efficient tool for doing repetitive tasks and saves a lot of time with minimum possibility of error.

During patching activity or downtime, all the schedulers can be stopped and jobs are halted.

Every now and then, I catch myself pondering the possibility of enhancements within the user interface (UI), envisioning that through specific improvements, the UI might have the potential to provide a more polished and user-centric encounter, promoting seamless engagements and simplifying the navigation process for individuals interacting with the software.

Inexperienced users could face a slight obstacle due to the unavailability of easily accessible instructional videos. This is a resource that could have been extremely beneficial in helping them become acquainted with the platform at the outset. A lack of documentation might impede a smooth adaptation to the platform and postpone the capacity to fully utilize the software's complete array of features to the highest degree possible.

I've used the solution for more than eight months now.

In our organization, we are running scheduled jobs or self-triggered jobs in batches iteratively. We have been using Tidal for all the primary purposes of development, testing, and production. Tidal has provided flexibility to run jobs in all these environments.

In the production environment, we perform systems administration and the development of the Job scheduling environment. I configure Tidal, maintain it, deploy it, apply hotfixes, or perform any type of system admin function.

In terms of deployment, we're on-premise. 

As per my experience in automation and job scheduling Tidal software is the easiest scheduler to use for creating schedules, jobs, and events. As it is Windows-based, most features are predefined and easy to apply and fix.

As far as the alerts are considered, if something breaks, after the threshold analysis, everybody would know about it, and then troubleshooting action can be taken. Ops Teams tasks have been simplified.

We have used Tidal Workload Automation to configure, communicate and integrate with a lot of different software and tools. We have used SQL Databases, AWS, Azure, and others. We haven't faced any config issues. Everything has been great.

Tidal Workload Automation UI is very interactive and great. It's easy to use and easy to administer, and it's very flexible. Tidal had always brought us good luck. 

We can run a lot of variety of types of scripts on a lot of different types of platforms and servers. It Interacts and communicates with all of them.

The availability of the job dependency feature has set up all the jobs to run in a dependent order rather than in just chronological order.

Tidal Vendor support is the best technical support team we've had to work with. Among various other software, they're the ones our team prefers to work with.

The alerting configurations can be enhanced and enabled according to the requirements. The threshold value differences can be implemented so that the monitor/viewers can get to know the difference in the value readings and can enhance accordingly to troubleshoot according to alerts. 

The job failure alerts can be updated with more details for better troubleshooting.

They can do better daily/weekly reporting in terms of production statistics reporting dashboard and generic variables in respective platforms.

I have been using the solution for two years at my organization.

Our business frequently handles large volumes of financial transactions that must be handled accurately and quickly. Automating financial procedures like billing, invoicing, and payment processing with Tidal Automation can help cut down on errors and enhance productivity.

Additionally, Tidal Automation aids us in automating IT operations chores like software updates, server upkeep, and security patching. This can decrease downtime, boost system dependability, and enhance IT efficiency as a whole.

By automating tasks and facilitating the quick implementation of new processes, Tidal Automation is assisting our organization in adapting to changing market conditions, customer requirements, and other factors.

By lowering the possibility of errors and the costs that go along with them, this product can produce outcomes that are more accurate and consistent.

It enables us to concentrate on tasks that are more valuable, like procedure improvements, innovation, and customer service. As a result, workers may be more productive because they can accomplish greater tasks in quicker amounts of time.

Tidal Automation has personalized showcases that provide real-time insights into job execution, resource utilization, and other metrics. This feature can help users monitor and optimize their operations more effectively.

Additionally, it provides compliance and audibility features that let us keep track of and manage all actions done, as well as monitor and restrict access to private data. This might improve data protection and ensure that all legal criteria are met.

The best feature is that it allows task scheduling based on particular occurrences, like the receipt of files, database updates, or system notifications. This can ensure tasks are finished as required and in reaction to particular circumstances.

To better fit their unique needs, the solution should give more customization options. More options for personalization could make it simpler for users to modify the service to fit their particular processes and increase overall efficacy.

It should be capable of handling even more work and more difficult processes, which is beneficial in big organizations.

Overall, Tidal Automation is a strong tool for automating processes. However, there are ways to make the service better in areas like the ones on the list above.

I've been using the Tidal Automation tool for five months now, and it's been a fantastic tool for automating our work tasks and allowing us to complete more tasks in less time. It increases productivity and reduces the need for manual intervention.

We use it for a host of standard/general stuff, like batch workflow automation, in the front and back offices. We have also centralized all of our SQL Server maintenance that is running on it. Instead of having SQL Server maintenance plans or jobs running on 300 or 400 disparate servers, we run them through Tidal so we have consolidated administration and reporting that feeds straight into ServiceNow.

Last year, we made a step change with our DR recovery process. We had a bunch of people running manual scripts and different things where you have networks: Wintel, DBAs, or application support teams. They were running their own separate scripts to do application failover. This is different when it's active-active or active-passive replication. What we did was integrate it with different command line driven jobs, like PowerShell commands, to effectively failover applications and infrastructure into a sequenced set of dependant jobs. Therefore, if we need DR, we were not relying on a mix of SMEs saying, "Where was that script or how do we fail this over?" Instead we can just push a button and the thing fails over, which is beautiful. 

Additionally we do compliance reporting from within Tidal and like many people we are regulated from PWC. Everyone has the technology control frameworks that they have to evidence. Instead of people taking screenshots, we will effectively find out what information PWC need and build the job using CLI which runs on either month or quarter end. The job will go off, collect that evidence, come back, and be formatted. Then, we just drop it in SharePoint or use Tidal to save it to a file share, sending an email off to say, "Your evidence is collected. You need to review it, then sent it onto audit."

We use it for a vast array of housekeeping jobs. It is not that Tidal is a monitoring tool, but automation is basically as far as your imagination can take you with anything that runs by a command line, which is virtually anything you can do. 

We previously had a use case for it to give us a quick alert for when some of our infrastructure became unavailable. We just had it running every minute. Typically, it's not an enterprise monitoring tool, but if you have some deficiencies or things that you need to enhance, or give a different sort of dimension to, we've used it for that in the past. We also run it against our infrastructure using PowerShell to pull a whole host of reporting from our infrastructure daily, which is useful.

We use Tidal to run SQL Server and Windows. There is not really any Unix.

Since we start using it, they do more stuff in AWS. They now have a whole bunch of different cloud capabilities. We are moving towards private cloud. We're in the sandbox at the moment.

The product helps our company in the way that we've engineered it using bespoke jobs that we've written in a clever way. There's nothing directly at the moment. That might change as we move into the cloud, depending on which cloud we go with or on the adapters that they use, e.g., if they have native S3 adapters or events that can fire Lambda functions, which are a bit more interesting to us.

There are many valuable features. I would struggle to say that there is one more useful than another. Job Events and its email capabilities are good. 

We have integrated Tidal with other automation platforms. You can integrate legacy platforms, as the integration is easy. Overall, we have good impressions of its ability to manage and monitor workloads.

They have a bit of work to do on the ServiceNow Adapter. At the moment with 6.2.1, we can send an SNMP Trap to ServiceNow in order to create an incident fail. However, there is so much scope for a CLA API interface between the Adapter and the stuff that you can do with it. I would have other use cases for different things within ServiceNow potentially if that was the case.

The reporting is kind of lacking and not super awesome. They have a product where the administrative overhead isn't that straightforward. Maybe, we're using it wrong.

The ability to express jobs as code is something I wanted for years now, especially as we move into the DevOps space. We have been doing one-touch deploys in terms of our CI/CD pipeline for a while and we have releases and code deployments that go through environments with a single tool for deploying. Therefore, SQL code, SSIS packages, and registry entries can install something all at once. Tidal can't do this for jobs, because they use a Transporter mechanism, which baffles me because the product is a SQL Server on the back-end. We would like it for a developer to be able to push a button saying "Script", which exports a script for the injection from one environment to another. This is what it needs instead of a clunky Transporter tool to take it from one environment to another. If they could just rip out the code that they were going to insert into the next phase, then we can express those jobs as code and dive into our consolidated release process. For me, in the DevOps space, expressing jobs as code would be the way to go.

The solution’s current drill-down functionality is alright because the Client Manager is an actual database. With the next version 6.5.3, they put that into a memory database. Therefore, you have no real ability to go through and have a look at it. I think there's a gap there.

10 years.

It has been super stable. There are no complaints on stability. We would not be using it if Tidal wasn't stable. You can't have an automation system that is unstable because it is too critical. If it's fallen over, everything is delayed in the morning. The business impact will be significant, because potentially your front office can't trade. If your automation platform doesn't work, you're in bad shape.

Two people are required maintenance.

We have had no scalability complaints. It is all pretty straightforward.

We're looking at rolling this out a bit more globally. We have some people in India, North America, and elsewhere. The rate that the skills get picked up can depend on the region, but it also depends on the skill sets that you already have. If you already have some knowledge of an automation tool or orchestration tools, then it's quite intuitive. However, if you have somebody who has never seen it before with no knowledge on the information system, then it might take them a bit longer.

We have about 100 DBAs, testers, business analysts, and automation developers using it. At one point, we had nine live environments.

I have been through many different iterations of the company. They used to be owned by Cisco, then Tidal was moved to somebody else. Now, it's with STA Group who seems very responsive and customer-driven, which is nice. They are making efforts to listen to their customers and see what they want, which is great. It's still in the early days to see how reactive they are in terms of development.

I've never called the technical support. My guys are the ones who have to speak to the tech support. I've not had any complaints.

We went from AutoSys (formerly CA) to Tidal. We switched because of CA's expensive licensing. They were also behind the curve.

The initial setup is fairly straightforward. There are a few nuances or a couple of bugs, but as soon as you report them, they are fixed as STA Group is fairly reactive.

We are in the process of an upgrade, but we have a whole lot of other work going on and are not under any pressure to get it done. We just took our time with it. Therefore, it's not like we're doing just this upgrade. Though, you could install an instance in a couple of days.

The amount of people involved in an upgrade or deployment depends on how your infrastructure stands up. If you have a small IT department and you have one guy who administers Tidal, builds the servers, does the installations, and has nothing else to work on, then it is pretty quick. If you work in a larger organization where you have teams working in silos where everyone is maxed out with BAU and projects, then you may have to wait three weeks for your servers and a bunch of other stuff. It depends on how siloed your infrastructure setup is. Once you have the servers, then you can install the thing with probably two or three guys. Though, it depends on how complex your setup is. E.g., if you're doing HA between different regions in AWS, then you will need more people from information security along with network specialists. 

If you can automate things that people are doing, you will save time and resources because people can be doing more value-add work than manual stuff. Broadly speaking, if you start automating all of your clients' compliance evidence and collecting, it becomes standard, then the people who are doing that can do something more useful. If you extrapolate that, then that is time well spent and saved.

I have had no issues with the licensing.

The solution enables admins and users to see the information relevant to them, but this is bundled as an add-on that we would have to pay for. I am attending a webinar on this feature next week. It remains to be seen how much it costs and what the value is. It's touted as giving you all the analytics that you want. We have had it 10 years and got by without this feature. Instead, we have DBAs who can write queries to pull out whatever we need from our SQL database. There are ways around everything, as there are a million ways to do stuff.

We have evaluated other solutions. 

I would rate the product as a seven (out of 10). I love the product. It's pretty good. There are more reporting analytics that I would like to do and see out-of-the-box. I would also like to not have to pay for it. Our implementation has been super stable, and it really kind of ticks all of the boxes.

The Adapters that they provided are quite good. We have SQL, Oracle, and other ones that we have used in the past. I'm looking forward to using two or three adapters and being able to do harsh cloud native capabilities with Lambda. These are particularly interesting as we go into the cloud space. I haven't used them yet.

I am a part of the sales operations team which deals with the pricing of products, getting the pricing set-up up in the system, collecting sales data from sales teams from various geographies, converting the files to a consumable format of Excel, getting the data uploaded on to the database, connect the database to reporting and data visualization tools like Power BI which helps us build reports, dashboards, and analyze business trends.

All of these tasks include a lot of manual processes that take a lot of time and effort.

The data needs to be uploaded to the database every time new data comes in. It could be a single line item or a thousand line item, data upload needs to be done manually and the DB job needs to run later we refresh reports and dashboards so that the new data gets populated. And all the necessary changes are made to the reports before they are published to services.

This is just a part of the daily routine and just this itself includes a lot of manual intervention. Tidal Automation has made it so simple by using time-driven and event-driven job scheduling and management. A significant amount of time and manual effort is now saved without compromising on the quality of the outcome.

Workload Automation has become simplified by Tidal Automation.

Tidal Automation is very efficient and can quickly automate most manual and repetitive tasks. It helps you save a lot of time and provides highly accurate output with minimal or no scope for error. The software has capabilities of handling errors and detecting failures which is a great feature and an added advantage to its users. Tidal Automation has abilities to manage and monitor jobs across various platforms and it is easy to integrate with other applications and services.

The initial set-up of the Tidal Automation is a bit complex and time-consuming; this can be eliminated by fastening the set-up process by reducing the number of steps involved.

The software can be made more user-friendly by producing effective training modules for new users and beginners.

The tool downtime can be reduced.

Understanding and using Tidal Automation could be overwhelming for someone with minimal programming language.

The above are minor challenges I can across, the product is cool and provides great services, and have not observed any major issues.

I've used the solution for less than a year.

The product is highly stable and will remain stable in the long run.

I find the software very useful and solved most of the problems on my team. I believe Tidal will be a great competition to other automation software out there.

My experience with customer service and support is great.

Positive

There were no automation tools used before.

The initial setup is a bit complex.

The initial setup was done in-house.

In terms of ROI, we have witnessed an:

• Increase in Productivity by ~28%
• Increase in Accuracy by ~8%

Tidal Automation licensing comes at affordable pricing and it is worth the features offered.

Microsoft SharePoint and Azure were also evaluated.

It's a great workload automation software that will simplify a lot of manual tasks.

Tidal Workload Automation Software is primarily used for scheduling, monitoring, and managing critical business and IT workflows across an organization's IT infrastructure. 

This software automates the execution of various workflows, including batch jobs, data transfers, file processing, and application integration, among others. 

The software provides a centralized platform for managing and automating crucial business processes such as report generation and customer service operations. The software can be used in a variety of industries, including finance, health care, manufacturing, etc.

Tidal Workload Automation Software helped my organization to reduce operational costs by streamlining processes, eliminating errors, and minimizing the need for manual intervention. Additionally, automating tasks reduces the need for hiring additional personnel, which can result in significant cost savings.

Tidal Workload Automation Software provides the ability to quickly adapt to changing business requirements.

The software helps organizations to easily modify workflows to accommodate changes in business processes, and it can dynamically allocate resources based on changing workloads.

Tidal Workload Automation Software provides Role-based access control, ensuring that only authorized personnel can access sensitive data and workflows. This feature is essential because it helps organizations maintain security and compliance with industry-specific regulations.

Tidal Workload Automation Software offers dynamic job scheduling, allowing organizations to locate resources based on workload demands. This feature ensures the resources are efficiently utilized, which helps in improving the organization's productivity.

Tidal Software interface could be more intuitive and user-friendly. I felt a little difficult to find the features I need. A more streamlined interface could help improve usability.

With cyber threats increasing rapidly, Tidal could benefit more by improving the security features such as encryption and access controls.

Tidal software could be of more advantage if it gets integrated with popular DevOps tools such as GIT, Jenkins, and Docker could help to streamline workload automation and accelerate application development and deployment.

I have been using the Tidal Workload Automation Software for the past 1.1 years.