HCL Workload Automation vs Tidal by Redwood comparison

HCLSoftware and Tidal Software by Redwood are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. HCLSoftware is ranked #23, while Tidal Software by Redwood is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.7. HCLSoftware holds a 2.5% mindshare in WA, compared to Tidal Software by Redwood’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Tidal Software by Redwood users who would recommend it.

HCL Workload Automation

Read 1 HCL Workload Automation review

771 Views
648 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tidal by Redwood

Read 37 Tidal by Redwood reviews

2,921 Views
1,168 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

HCL Workload Automation

Tidal by Redwood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Tidal by Redwood and HCL Workload Automation compete in workload automation. HCL Workload Automation has the upper hand due to its robust feature set, though Tidal by Redwood offers competitive pricing and ease of deployment.

Features: Tidal by Redwood provides an intuitive interface for automation, strong integration capabilities, and detailed analytics. HCL Workload Automation offers comprehensive automation features including advanced scheduling, dynamic workload placement, and seamless cloud integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tidal by Redwood delivers straightforward deployment with responsive customer service, resulting in easier onboarding. HCL Workload Automation, while more complex to deploy, is supported by extensive documentation and a global customer support network.

Pricing and ROI: Tidal by Redwood presents a cost-effective setup with quick ROI, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. HCL Workload Automation requires a higher initial investment but promises substantial long-term ROI through its extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HCL Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tidal by Redwood

Ranking in Workload Automation

4th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of HCL Workload Automation is 2.5%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tidal by Redwood is 3.0%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

reviewer1418508

Subject Matter Expert at DXC Technology

Easy to set up, good support, and helps to decrease project costs

With the mainframe environment that we have, it is more similar to the HCL migration, or the workload scheduler. We also like the CWHC utilities; they are more current and under the umbrella of HCL. It reduces project risks. Easy to set up, it doesn't require a lot. You can start working immediately. Migration is increased while it decreases the cost of the project.

Read full review

Steve Mikula

IT Scheduling Manager at Paychex, Inc.

Very reliable processing engine, and scheduling is flawless—crucial elements in our financial transaction processing

Because we've been on it for 20 years, it's pretty easy for us to automate jobs with Tidal at this point. It has become second nature. It's pretty simplistic to set up and get going, although there are different levels of complexity you can have within the product. It depends on how simple you want to keep it. If you just keep it: Job A, Job B, Job C, Job D, that becomes pretty simple. But when you start integrating some complex calendars that use sub-calendars—and you can go three, four, or five deep to set up schedules—it becomes more complicated. The beauty of it is you can go as deep as you need to. We can get really complex or we can keep it simple. We have some use cases for both scenarios. The thing that I like the most is the reliability of the engine. The actual scheduling part of the product is pretty much flawless, but the stability of the product is what I find to be reassuring. We are a financial company, we move billions of dollars a day, and if we don't have our transactions processed in a timely manner we can be penalized and our clients can be penalized. It can have a serious financial impact.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easy to set up, it doesn't require a lot."

"Thinking of all the people involved in checking jobs on a daily basis, manually running jobs or auditing them through standalone tools, and trying to connect them. We have saved hundreds of hours weekly, which is substantial."

"Tidal Automation is very efficient and can quickly automate most manual and repetitive tasks."

"The feature that I find to be valuable, as I'm working with other folks, is the ability to cross-schedule across platforms, and the flexibility that comes with that."

"We have to run about 12,000 jobs every day and the majority of them need to be launched from our ERP, JD Edwards. The native compatibility of the Tidal platform with JD Edwards dovetails with our greatest need. It's directly connected to the heart of our IT system. We couldn't work without it."

"Tidal Automation allows organizations to automate complex workflows and processes, reducing the need for manual intervention and improving operational efficiency."

"We use the solution for cross-platform and cross-application workloads. That's one of the core reasons we chose it. It's one of a few things in the industry that can be used for cross-platform integration."

"The best feature of Tidal Workload Automation Software is its ease of integration with other systems, including ERP, CRM, and BI tools."

"It's the most efficient tool in doing repetitive tasks and saves a lot of time with minimum possibility of error."

More Tidal by Redwood pros

Cons

"The interface needs some improvements."

"For the most part, the drill-down and the logging are really good. But if we take an Informatica job, for example: We have the ability, and the operators have the ability, to actually drill down and see, at a session level, where the failure is. There is, unfortunately, no way to extract that into an actual output email or failure email. It's not that that information is not available, but extracting it into an email would be a nice-to-have."

"They can do better reporting in terms of production statistics reporting."

"We've had some quirky stuff happen on an occasional basis where a job does not take off. For example, a job we expected to be finished by 3:00 a.m. is sitting there and not executing when we come in in the morning. We have to go all the way back to the dependencies and then we can see that one of the dependencies has become unscheduled, for some reason. No changes were made to the schedule but this prerequisite job has, all of a sudden, become unscheduled. I have brought this up with Tidal's support but they have never had an answer for it."

"The user interface is the place that needs the most work. If and when we find issues with the product, they are usually in that area. If I had to choose, that's where I'd want issues, as opposed to in the engine. But the UI is average. It's a little sluggish at times and there are some bugs in it."

"The drill-down into details using the Graphical Views feature is a bit difficult and not that helpful. If you want to go into the details, you have to go to the Job Activity. Graphical Views is not that easy for getting that kind of information."

"I don't know if Tidal wants to get into the business of monitoring long-running jobs, but that could be a feature for the future: a job launching and monitoring tool. Using Tidal for monitoring doesn't seem like a good fit, but if they could offer something that did that as an add-on or include it, it might be helpful."

"From an administrative point of view, I wouldn't give really high marks to the solution. I actually entertained getting the JAWS application at one point. One of the shortcomings with the scheduler is the reporting capabilities. At least at the time, JAWS was the best that they had for a third-party integration. I think they've got things in the pipeline to help alleviate that gap."

"I know they are working on it, but there needs to be better reporting. Currently, there are only three or four reports that we can get off of the system. That needs to be improved. They already have a solution to this in the new version. I.e., a schedule of all the jobs running for one day, specifically calling out what dependencies that job relies on. It would be like a flow chart of how the day's jobs would run."

More Tidal by Redwood cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price is reasonable in terms of the product’s functionality."

"Our licensing model for Tidal is on an annual basis. It is very good and works well for us. Tidal's licensing is very transparent and simple. It lets you know, for the amount you use, that's the price that you pay. So, we buy X number of licenses, and we know that this is where we are. I'm very happy with that. I saw the licensing modules on other platforms, and I didn't like them. Other companies and solutions would calculate the connections, adapters, and instances. I think that's the reason that BMC was pretty expensive: They just didn't understand what our needs are."

"...it is a pretty affordable scheduler tool that lets us do a lot. You get a lot of bang for the buck... The licensing model is hugely flexible."

"The pricing is pretty reasonable. That seems to help a lot versus other companies. There are no other fees aside from the standard licensing fees. There are other products out there where you pay based on how many jobs you run and so on, and I know that's very frustrating for users."

"We think the pricing is very fair. We have been happy with the pricing compared to some of the other solutions in the space."

"I have had no issues with the licensing."

"The solution has no hidden costs. It helps me to plan forward into the future. I know that I can add another 100 or a thousand jobs, and that's how much it will cost me today."

"The new prices that we've received seem reasonable and comparable to the marketplace."

More Tidal by Redwood pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Tidal Automation?

Tidal Automation by Redwood is a user-friendly solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tidal Automation?

The price is reasonable in terms of the product’s functionality.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tidal Automation?

Initially, it is complicated to understand the functionalities as there is limited product documentation. The setup and configuration of the software is a bit complicated. Providing the training vi...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Workload Automation vs HCL Workload Automation

Compared 62% of the time

Control-M vs HCL Workload Automation

Compared 28% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs HCL Workload Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Automic Automation vs HCL Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More HCL Workload Automation Competitors

Control-M vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 42% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More Tidal by Redwood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

March 2025

Download HCL Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Tidal by Redwood

March 2025

Download Tidal by Redwood product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tidal Workload Automation, Cisco Workload Automation, Tidal Enterprise Scheduler

Overview

HCL Workload Automation manages complex workflows, enabling efficient job scheduling and monitoring, essential for companies needing robust task automation.

HCL Workload Automation is designed to streamline tasks, handle large data volumes, ensure timely execution of processes, and integrate applications seamlessly. It is crucial for improving operational efficiency and reducing manual intervention. Users value its scheduling capabilities, integration flexibility, and performance. The tool's advanced features for monitoring and reporting enhance task management efficiency. Its reliability and scalability are key strengths. However, users note that it could benefit from enhanced reporting, simplified configuration, improved documentation, and better technical support response times. Optimization for resource utilization would also boost performance levels.

What are the key features of HCL Workload Automation?

Scheduling Capabilities: Flexible job scheduling to meet diverse automation needs.
Integration: Seamless integration with various applications and systems.
Performance: Robust performance in managing workloads efficiently.
Monitoring and Reporting: Advanced capabilities for monitoring and analytics.
Scalability: Reliable and scalable to handle growing demands.

What benefits should you consider when reviewing HCL Workload Automation?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines tasks and reduces manual intervention.
Time Management: Ensures timely execution of processes.
Data Handling: Capable of managing large volumes efficiently.
Reduced Error Rates: Automates tasks to minimize human error.
Flexibility and Integration: Handles various applications seamlessly.

HCL Workload Automation is implemented in industries that require efficient job scheduling and monitoring, such as finance, healthcare, and IT services. It helps streamline processes, manage high volumes of data, and integrate with critical applications, ensuring operational efficiency. Different industries use it for automating repetitive tasks and enhancing productivity.

HCLSoftware

Tidal Software is a leading provider of enterprise workload automation solutions that orchestrate the execution of complex workflows across systems, applications and IT environments. With a comprehensive portfolio of products and services, Tidal optimizes mission-critical business processes, increases IT cost efficiencies and satisfies legal and regulatory compliance requirements. Hundreds of customers around the world count on Tidal for modernizing their workload automation and driving their digital transformation. Tidal Software is headquartered in Chicago with offices in Houston, London, Minsk, Belarus and Chennai, India. For more information, visit tidalsoftware.com.

Tidal Software by Redwood

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Redwood Software, Broadcom and others in Workload Automation. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.