Trend Micro Deep Security Reviews

We use it for security, specifically for old servers still in the company. It is doing its job.

I have heard of a lot of threats coming from Europe, but they have never touched our company.

The reports are very extensive. They give us information about things that we are not expecting, such as number of threats that failed due to compromised servers.

It is connected into an intelligence database and is quick to pick up new threats. It also reduces my workload with its speed and the protection that it provides.

The working interface and the reports for non-technical people could use improvement. They are a bit scary.

It is very stable. We are not putting too much stress on it since we are scaling down.

We have not had any problems with scalability. We have very few servers for it to protect. Instead of scaling out, we are shrinking the number of servers (scaling down).

We hired a third-party to do the AWS integration and configuration. The reseller appointed them, and everything was done for us.

On an AWS defined scope, it will cheaper than buying the on-premise service. We did a trial for the on-premise version, but we decided to go with the AWS version. We are downsizing our server room, and it didn't make sense to put more machines in there, as we already have workloads in Indianapolis. 

We already use Trend Micro for their endpoint protection. Therefore, we selected them for their server product because we liked their endpoint protection product. The process took a week to ten days. 

I would recommend it. I have been satisfied, as it is a good product.

There are several features I find valuable, including the fact that it's agentless, each module can be installed on its own, it provides a single pane of glass for managing it, its integration with VMWare (NSX), and items are auto-added as soon as they're discovered. Ease of use is a big plus because of the foregoing items.

We were having some AV issues around 2010 and the incumbent product had gotten big and clunky and was interfering with several desktops performance. When the solution let 3 viruses in over a few weeks I deemed it no longer suitable and we chose Trend Micro Deep Security as the replacement.

Right from the start it was easy: the installation routine very kindly sought out and removed the previous solution, greatly reducing deployment time (we implemented OfficeScan first) and DS uses auto discovery. Updates are automatic and run smoothly in off hours (except for pattern updates of course).

The Trend Micro solution was stable after a few tweaks and was instrumental in stopping an incursion of ransom ware that could have brought the company to its knees. Instead we had only a few file directories encrypted and we were able to restore those in about a day. We spend way less time on AV issues since implementing Trend Micro Deep Security.

There are several areas for improvement:

• The ability to manage agent-based AV (i.e. integrate Officescan into Deep Security) for desktops and laptops;
• Streamline the install (specifically configuring of external product requirements i.e. the VMware side); and
• Better integration with Control Manager (had a few issues with it not recognizing the DS server).

I've used it for over five years.

Deployment went surprisingly smoothly. Mind you we had a Trend Micro tech (Trevor) do the initial config.

We've had no issues with stability.

We've had no issues with scalability, but we're not a big shop (under 200 VM’s).

Trend Micro's service has always been one of its strong points. I don’t particularly like the online case management tool, but response has always been good. Local support is stellar (Vancouver, Canada area) – both reps and support techs.

Technical support is excellent. A Trend Micro tech was always available to me locally and this helped reduce the time-to-resolution of the few issues that came up.

Yes, we used Symantec. We found it was getting a larger footprint in memory and was starting to cause performance issues. When it failed to stop viruses 3 times in 3 weeks, I had enough. On all counts, Trend Micro is a superior product with superior people, and I have never regretted the switch.

It was a fairly standard install as we were not a large data centre. Trevor (then Martin) – both local Trend Micro techs - took about a day to get it all settled down. Over the next month, I made several support calls but mostly because I did not yet have the experience with it. After a month or so, I no longer needed the support.

The install was done by a Trend Micro tech (Trevor) and later supported by Martin Sima. Both are excellent fellows.

I'm not exactly sure what our ROI is as we did not quantify it. But I can say that supporting our users got a whole lot easier and we had a significant reduction in time spent on AV issues at the desktop. Management was easier (auto add new VM’s, etc.) and Control Manager provided reports for my bosses.

Trend Micro now does certificates and this made getting certs easy and fast. Pricing was competitive, although I have not looked at pricing recently. Licensing was also easy as each additional module could be licensed separately.

I was pretty aware of the market in 2010. I knew Symantec was not doing the job anymore and I had used Trend Micro in a previous life and knew the OfficeScan product. I also considered Sophos as they have a large local presence. I do not ever want McAfee again (bad experience back in the ‘90s). And I didn’t trust the Russian product.

Make friends with your local rep and support tech – they can help you over the gotchas and issues that invariably arise with a new implementation. There is lots of online training also from Trend Micro. And classroom courses are available; I took the Deep Security course in Ottawa the first year we had it.

I primarily use the solution for web security and port encryption. It helps protect endpoints. 

The solution offers advanced options for endpoint security. There is predictive machine learning and AI monitoring. 

The endpoint protection is very good at that level. 

It helps protect us from hackers. We're able to add locks on data to protect everything. 

There's useful monitoring on offer.

The logs are quite helpful. 

It easily increases the performance of the servers. It doesn't take a lot of performance away from the server itself. 

It is scalable.

The solution is stable and reliable. 

We'd like to have more application control. It would help us block things more strategically. 

Support could be faster. 

I've used the solution for a while. 

This is a stable solution. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is scalable. You can expand usage as needed. You just need to buy more licenses. 

We have more than 60 users on the product. 

Technical support typically responds within one hour. They are responsive. Of course, we'd always like faster responses when we are facing issues. 

The initial setup is installed locally. It can be a bit complicated as we have to do it on-premises and we need to gain console access.

We can pay for the license on a yearly basis. If you want to do financing, you can go month by month.

I'd recommend the solution to other companies. If a company has a critical or high-availability server, this is a good product. It's also great for endpoints. It's great for companies with critical services. 

I would rate the solution nine out of ten. We've been happy with how it has been working so far. 

Patch management is most valuable. The major selling point of Deep Security is that it is based on the cloud. Deep Security is for the servers and databases of data centers, and generally, for patch management, you have to shut down the machines, and then you have to restart them. So, they need shutdown time, which is a cost. Big enterprises don't want to shut down their database or their data center for any kind of patch. Deep Security creates a wall and downloads all patches. You install it on the cloud. So, it saves your server from any kind of intrusion or any kind of penetration, and whenever you get a chance or time, in six, eight, or nine months, you can physically download or install all those patches in one go. So, it saves you time. It also saves your shutdown time and keeps your data center safe.

Along with patching, they also provide antivirus protection on the servers.

It should have XDR and EDR integration. It would be nice if they can tie it up with an XDR or EDR.

Its price is also quite high. It is more expensive than other products for patching. So, it would be nice if they lower its price.

We have been providing this solution for about two to three years.

It is very stable. That's why it is doing so well. They have already captured 90% of the financial market in our country.

I won't say that it is scalable. It is the final product, but it has a few add-ons. You can add other products of Trend Micro, for example, XDR or EDR, along with DDI, but you can't scale Deep Security to another level. It is the final product.

It is a very expensive solution, so it has mostly been used at an enterprise level. Around 90% of the customers belong to the financial sector, and around 95% of banks in Pakistan are using it.

They have a pretty good support system. The best part is that they have their support team on the ground in Pakistan. They also have a support team back at their headquarters. Along with that, they have built a support team at the distributor level. They have also trained the partners. So, support is quite good and efficient.

Its installation is pretty easy. You can do the installation remotely because it is on the cloud, so you have access from anywhere.

Installation duration depends on how many servers you have, but it normally takes about four to five days. It is not just the installation. After installing it, you also have to do testing and other stuff.

You do need certified engineers for it.

It is a very expensive solution. It would be nice if they lower its price.

Its license is based on the machines.

I recommend Deep Security to almost all of my customers. It is a very good product. I would rate Deep Security a nine out of 10.

I used the solution for a UK-based banking company. They had around 200 Linux servers. They had the product installed as an antivirus solution on the servers. We were responsible for managing malware or virus detection. We protected the environment from malicious files.

The user interface is the most valuable feature. The customer support provided by the tool is also valuable. The software is regularly updated. We don't face any major issues after updates. It is pretty compatible with every system.

The updates for legacy systems are not rolled out frequently. The product must improve on it.

I have been using the solution for two years.

I rate the product’s stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability a nine out of ten. I work with a security services company. Four of my colleagues are also using it in their enterprise environment.

The customer support is very good.

Positive

The solution provides proper documentation for setting it up. It's pretty easy. We can follow the steps in the video tutorials. It’s simple to configure. We installed Trend Micro Deep Security Manager on Windows Server and connected all the agents to it. The deployment took around five to seven minutes on each server. It depends on the network speed.

My company is a partner. I am a technical person supporting my clients with the product. Trend Micro is a very reliable company. Its products are easy to use and easy to deploy. It has a pretty good name in the cybersecurity market. Trend Micro continuously conducts workshops and events to engage with its partners. It keeps the partners and customers aware of the new technologies.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

As a security competency company, we play a lot on this product. For us, it's one of the best for data center solutions. Deep Security is something that is a classic antivirus. However, it uses two-function device control. Everything is inside. We have virtual patching capabilities, which are very interesting in Deep Security. Virtual patching is just a host IPS solution which, if there is a delay in installing the patch, the patch is available by the editor.

It's a good product overall.

There is not a lot of bugs like you have in other antivirus solutions. It's quite stable. 

The initial setup is pretty easy.

The solution is scalable. 

The solution is quite secure. 

The main drawback is that it's complicated. With Trend Micro solutions, everything is complicated. Deep Security has its own management console, and every product in Trend Micro has its own management console. Everything is siloed. Now, they are trying now to connect everything inside the main control management or reporting console, however, it's still not a central management console. It makes for a lot of work when applying policies and security solutions.

The product isn't very user-friendly.

It's a bit old-fashioned in its design and approach.

While, for example, McAfee might have a new version every two months, Trend Micro might not release a new version for two years. While it's very stable, it could be a bit too long in-between versions.

It would be ideal if the solution communicated better with other security solutions from other brands. This is an issue. They need to open up their API or give access, or exchange information with other security products so that everything can communicate together, learn from each other, and block malicious threats better.

We've been using the solution for a long time. It's been three or four years or so.

The stability is very good. There aren't a lot of bugs or glitches. In comparison, for example, Sophos has some bugs and McAfee has a lot of bugs. When they give you a new version, you know that you have to wait for the service pack, to be sure that it will be up and running in production.

This product doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The thing users need to understand about the solution is that Deep Security is not by default meant to manage 100,000 PCs. It's for data centers, and it's for less than 300 servers at the same time. That said, even a big company doesn't have a lot of servers available. In terms of scalability, we don't find a limit for the moment based on the customer base we have.

You can also scale via the cloud. It's very flexible and you can deploy on command, on a virtual server in the cloud. 

We've dealt with technical support in the past. We only call them, from time to time, if we can't figure out the answer ourselves. While four or so years ago they weren't as fast, not we get a quick response. Over the past year, we've been quite pleased with the level of support.

We're familiar with older versions of McAfee. We are playing with Sophos for the UTM, the NG Firewall, and for the antivirus, Sophos Intercept X. I've also worked with Kaspersky.

Which is best depends on the client. While Kaspersky, for example, is good for smaller clients, Trend Micro is better for medium to larger ones. However, the solution isn't something you just set and forget. You have to take details, verify, validate, and be aware that a small change will not produce too many logs on the threat detection.

The implementation process is not very complex. If the initial setup is just replacing a competitor antivirus with Trend Micro, it's very easy. The only thing you have to be sure of is that you are setting up the right functionality. Trend Micro Deep Security, has a lot of functions. If you want a classic antivirus, there are very few functions to set up. However, if you want a specific functionality, there may be more steps. There will be more fine-tuning that is required to make sure you are well-protected.

When you have start Deep Security on something that was not equipped with an antivirus, or equipped with, let's say, Bitdefender or Windows Defender, you have very few protections. If you don't take care of covering all these safety functions, you'll be vulnerable. That said, you need to be careful of which functions you activate. You need to make sure it makes sense in terms of the rest of your setup.

It's been one of the four main antivirus solutions, deployed in an industrial way. We've been quite happy with it. You can deploy it on-premises or the cloud, and it's possible to use it with Windows and Linux.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been very happy with it and found it to be quite secure. 

Of course, next-generation solutions such as Crowd Strike or Carbon Black are game-changing. 

Our main use case of this product is for antivirus and virtual patching.

From a security perspective, signatures and that kind of thing are frequently updated and we have not come across any virus detection.

It would help if they would reduce the price. 

I've been using this solution for four years. 

Scalability is good. We currently have 8,000 users and are planning to increase in the future. 

The technical support is fine. 

Most of our traffic comes from blacklisted IPs, virus types, and phishing proofing. These are the major use cases that we observe in our daily operations.

I would like to see XDR features and endpoint sensors become available.

I have been using Trend Micro Deep Security for one and a half years now.

It is stable and we have not faced any challenges during the rollout.

Trend Micro Deep Security is definitely scalable.

We raise a ticket with Trend Micro Deep Security customer service when any issue occurs.

The setup is straightforward and takes around a month to deploy. We deployed through the SCCM tool.

We have four hundred servers globally. I would rate Trend Micro Deep Security a nine out of ten.