UiPath Orchestrator Reviews

We use the solution to manage scheduling and everything related to bots.

The product has been pretty amazing at deploying, scheduling, and running automated bots. We have run it across different environments.

The focus areas of different customers are different. Some customers are more interested in the Attended Robot, and some in Unattended Robot. A couple of our customers are more focused on security compliance. The wow factor depends on the customer’s interest.

Maintaining the bots and going through the logs are useful for automation processes. It’s the basic thing needed for any RPA implementation. I have heard that the centralized dashboards are pretty good. We haven’t faced any challenges that we couldn’t find a solution for. The marketing strategy is pretty decent. The documentation is good.

The vendor should provide free certification to their partners.

I have been using the solution for approximately a year.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten.

The scalability depends on my infrastructure and setup if I’m not using the cloud.

We need some technical skills to learn the product. UiPath provides training material. We might find the deployment difficult in the beginning. Once we learn, it gets easier.

It takes a few weeks to one month to see a return on investment.

The product’s pricing is competitive. It provides different pricing models for different customers. We can either buy the tools separately or as a bundle.

I have used K2 for automation before. UiPath’s marketplace, developer base, and how it deals with the customers and partners make a bit of a difference.

I’m a reseller. People who are planning to buy the tool must go ahead and try it out. There is a community version that is available for free. We can sign up and use it. We can try and test it. If we face any issues, we can seek help from a reseller. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

One standout feature I like in UiPath Orchestrator is the scheduling capability. It simplifies task automation by allowing precise scheduling of processes. Another great advantage is the centralized data collection, which provides a comprehensive view of bot activity across different environments. This centralized logging is crucial for compliance and offers insights into bot performance and error logs.

One area for improvement in UiPath Orchestrator is enhancing automation for exceptional cases. Currently, there are scenarios where manual intervention is needed if something unexpected occurs. Having more automation features to handle such situations seamlessly would be beneficial, making the overall infrastructure more efficient and user-friendly.

A few additional functionalities that could make my experience even better would be having the ability to log local keywords and enhance the scheduling function would be great. Additionally, features like bot timers and optimizing password settings within Orchestrator, especially for password changes, would be highly appreciated, simplifying the password management process.

I have been working with UiPath Orchestrator for over four years.

I would rate the stability of the product as an eight out of ten. We have not had any major issues.

In terms of scalability, I would rate UiPath Orchestrator at an eight out of ten. The ability to scale up depends on having the correct design, but if done right, it can handle various company sizes—small, medium, or large.

UiPath Orchestrator compares favorably with solutions like Automation Anywhere's Control Room and Microsoft Power Automate. The reason I find UiPath Orchestrator better is its scalability, comprehensive features, regular addition of new functionalities, and its position as a leader in the RPA space.

The initial setup for UiPath Orchestrator has become much simpler with the shift to the cloud. Now, when we purchase a bot, whether attended or unattended, Orchestrator comes along. In the past, installing Orchestrator involved setting up a separate server, configuring a SQL MSSQL database, and ensuring specific requirements were met. However, with the current cloud architecture, these hassles are eliminated, and we only need to log in to the cloud and manage our organization.

I would rate the costliness of the product as a six out of ten.

As a user of UiPath Orchestrator, I have experienced the transition from on-premises to cloud-based Orchestrator. The cloud version eliminates the hassle of maintaining separate servers and databases. Now, I don't need to worry about infrastructure, and it is more convenient. However, ensuring the right ports and URLs are open for security can be a consideration.

Overall, I would rate UiPath Orchestrator as a seven out of ten.

Mainly, our processes are automatically triggered, so they proceed that way. The UiPath Orchestrator is primarily used for generating necessary reports, handling bug reports, and troubleshooting scenarios.

The tool's most valuable feature is reporting. Being on the business side, I need to report on the efficiency and the business case scenarios we build upon for the RPA. I need to find and analyze the relevant data.

The solution's pricing can be more competitive. Apache is one of the most expensive alternatives in the market. The integration with reporting tools and classic solutions is essential. Having BI integration, Salesforce integration, and robust monitoring and reporting capabilities would enhance the product. 

I have been using the product for five years. 

My company has ten users for the product, and it is scalable. 

The tool's deployment was both straightforward and challenging. The support was good. However, preparing the infrastructure for hosting the UiPath Orchestrator posed some challenges. We overcame the challenges with internal efforts and coordination. 

I rate the product an eight out of ten. 

We use the product for provisioning, deployment, and monitoring of both attended and unattended bots for efficient robotic processes.

It is challenging to accurately define text within images for the product. They should address pricing concerns by either revising the subscription model or providing more flexible options to users. In comparison, Microsoft 365 offers more affordable bundled licenses.

We have been using UiPath Orchestrator for around two years.

The technical support services are good. However, they take a long time to resolve the issues.

Positive

The implementation process is easy for our technical team. However, it is complicated to explore different processes and agree on specific processes for automation within our company.

The product is expensive compared to Microsoft. The customers have to pay additional costs for support services.

UiPath Orchestration works effectively in deploying, scheduling, and running automated bots across different environments. It helps in provisioning trigger monitoring and tracking the work of both attended and unattended bots. It is easy to integrate with other products as well.

I rate the interface of the centralized dashboard a ten out of ten. It has largely improved operation efficiency.

Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

We use it to automate website-related processes.

It was very simple to use and allowed us to easily record and manage activities.

The code management for the Studio could be improved.

Another area of improvement is support. The response time could be faster.

I have been using this solution for four years. 

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten.

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. It's pretty easy to scale.

There are over a hundred end users using this solution in our organization.

Sometimes there's a wait for the response. Otherwise, the support is okay.

Positive

The initial setup is moderate, not very simple, and not very complex.

We had a consultant help with the setup.

I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten, where one being expensive and ten being cheap. So, it's a good price.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

I had faced issues with passwords and the monitoring feature. 

I have been using the solution for four years. 

I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten. 

I rate UiPath Orchestrator's scalability a ten out of ten. 

The response time and support quality are good. 

Positive

UiPath Orchestrator's deployment is simple. 

I rate UiPath Orchestrator's pricing a six out of ten. 

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten. 

We use UiPath Orchestrator daily to view logs and configure machines. We employ a modern folder structure and have developed a dashboard based on the logs we get to the database.

The solution has improved workflow efficiency by helping us better manage transactions and queues. However, recent increases in licensing costs have been a concern.

The platform's modern folder structure has been valuable because it helps organize and manage automation processes effectively.

The product could improve by migrating more functionalities from the cloud to the on-premises version sooner. Additionally, scalability could be enhanced.

Future releases should include more AI-related features to automate configurations and management tasks to reduce manual effort.

I have more than seven years of experience with UiPath Orchestrator.

I rate the product stability as eight or nine out of ten. 

I rate the product scalability a six out of ten. It could be improved to handle larger and more complex environments better.

We used Blue Prism more than a year ago. We switched to UiPath due to its different features and capabilities.

The initial setup was straightforward. 

Our technical team handled the implementation in-house.

The product is expensive. 

I rate UiPath Orchestrator a seven out of ten. 

UiPath Orchestrator is a user-friendly solution. In my organization, multiple teams work on the same UiPath Orchestrator, and I can assign different roles to different teams. We can create separate folders for their deployment and their robots. UiPath Orchestrator has a very user-friendly interface that helps users easily understand the different features and functionalities.

The solution’s licensing cost is high and could be improved.

The solution could include more AI capabilities in the next release.

I have previously used Automation Anywhere for some process development purposes. Compared to other solutions, UiPath Orchestrator is the best.

UiPath Orchestrator is easy to implement and configure.

Overall, I rate UiPath Orchestrator an eight out of ten.