UiPath Orchestrator Reviews

We use the solution for Supply Chain Management. 

I like UiPath Orchestrator's screen capture feature. 

The credential vault is generic and does not have process categorization. The tool needs to arrange a Customer Success Manager for support. It should also improve the credential manager and integrate a customized form of retrieving the details. There should be more dashboards as well. 

I have been using the solution for four to five years. 

UiPath Orchestrator is more stable compared to other products. 

We use Automation Anywhere along with UiPath Orchestrator. 

UiPath Orchestrator's installation is easy and can be completed in a few days. Two resources from tier-two support helped us with the installation. You need four resources to maintain the tool. 

We have seen ROI with the tool's use. 

The solution's price is high. We have subscribed to 15 licenses which are paid on a yearly basis. We don't pay any additional costs for support and maintenance. 

UiPath Orchestrator is a stable product with more features than other RPA products. I rate the product an eight out of ten. 

We use UiPath Orchestrator daily to view logs and configure machines. We employ a modern folder structure and have developed a dashboard based on the logs we get to the database.

The solution has improved workflow efficiency by helping us better manage transactions and queues. However, recent increases in licensing costs have been a concern.

The platform's modern folder structure has been valuable because it helps organize and manage automation processes effectively.

The product could improve by migrating more functionalities from the cloud to the on-premises version sooner. Additionally, scalability could be enhanced.

Future releases should include more AI-related features to automate configurations and management tasks to reduce manual effort.

I have more than seven years of experience with UiPath Orchestrator.

I rate the product stability as eight or nine out of ten. 

I rate the product scalability a six out of ten. It could be improved to handle larger and more complex environments better.

We used Blue Prism more than a year ago. We switched to UiPath due to its different features and capabilities.

The initial setup was straightforward. 

Our technical team handled the implementation in-house.

The product is expensive. 

I rate UiPath Orchestrator a seven out of ten. 

The product is used in invoice and purchasing processes.

The solution is easy to use.

The product must provide process mining features.

I have been using the solution for one and a half years.

The product has been stable so far.

The solution is scalable. Including developers, the solution is used by 15 people in our organization. It is the major tool for three to four employees. We need three or four people to maintain and administer the product. We are planning to increase the usage in future.

We are quite satisfied with the technical support. I rate the support an eight or nine out of ten.

Positive

We assign the task to administrators and follow up with them. It takes one or two days to prepare the machine. It is easy to learn how to use the solution.

The product’s pricing is a little higher than reasonable. There was a little increase in the cost. It was an issue, but it was accepted.

Some new people joined the admin team. They were quite happy when they were introduced to the tool. It’s a good product. It provides good courses on its website on automation and other tools. I would recommend using it. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We use the product for provisioning, deployment, and monitoring of both attended and unattended bots for efficient robotic processes.

It is challenging to accurately define text within images for the product. They should address pricing concerns by either revising the subscription model or providing more flexible options to users. In comparison, Microsoft 365 offers more affordable bundled licenses.

We have been using UiPath Orchestrator for around two years.

The technical support services are good. However, they take a long time to resolve the issues.

Positive

The implementation process is easy for our technical team. However, it is complicated to explore different processes and agree on specific processes for automation within our company.

The product is expensive compared to Microsoft. The customers have to pay additional costs for support services.

UiPath Orchestration works effectively in deploying, scheduling, and running automated bots across different environments. It helps in provisioning trigger monitoring and tracking the work of both attended and unattended bots. It is easy to integrate with other products as well.

I rate the interface of the centralized dashboard a ten out of ten. It has largely improved operation efficiency.

Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

UiPath Orchestrator is a user-friendly solution. In my organization, multiple teams work on the same UiPath Orchestrator, and I can assign different roles to different teams. We can create separate folders for their deployment and their robots. UiPath Orchestrator has a very user-friendly interface that helps users easily understand the different features and functionalities.

The solution’s licensing cost is high and could be improved.

The solution could include more AI capabilities in the next release.

I have previously used Automation Anywhere for some process development purposes. Compared to other solutions, UiPath Orchestrator is the best.

UiPath Orchestrator is easy to implement and configure.

Overall, I rate UiPath Orchestrator an eight out of ten.

We use it to automate website-related processes.

It was very simple to use and allowed us to easily record and manage activities.

The code management for the Studio could be improved.

Another area of improvement is support. The response time could be faster.

I have been using this solution for four years. 

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten.

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. It's pretty easy to scale.

There are over a hundred end users using this solution in our organization.

Sometimes there's a wait for the response. Otherwise, the support is okay.

Positive

The initial setup is moderate, not very simple, and not very complex.

We had a consultant help with the setup.

I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten, where one being expensive and ten being cheap. So, it's a good price.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

I had faced issues with passwords and the monitoring feature. 

I have been using the solution for four years. 

I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten. 

I rate UiPath Orchestrator's scalability a ten out of ten. 

The response time and support quality are good. 

Positive

UiPath Orchestrator's deployment is simple. 

I rate UiPath Orchestrator's pricing a six out of ten. 

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten. 

UiPath Orchestrator is a stable solution.

UiPath Orchestrator should improve its UI and make it more user-friendly. The solution's governing policies feature could also be improved.

I have been testing UiPath Orchestrator for a few months.

UiPath Orchestrator is a scalable solution, but it would require a lot more configuration compared to other products to be able to scale effectively.

I have previously worked with Aiwozo, Power Automate, and Automation Anywhere.

Aiwozo has a multi-tenanted architecture. So I like that about the product. The simple Kibana-style structure of moving processes from one environment to another and the rule-based password control policy are useful features of Aiwozo.

Multi-culture automation is something that quite a few of our international clients demand, and the ease with which I can switch from one language to another is also important to me. That is why I've recommended Aiwozo to most of my clients.

UiPath Orchestrator has the capabilities. Compared to other programs, UiPath Orchestrator has some nuances that can be improved upon. The new-age automation tools, like Aiwozo, are a little easier to use than UiPath Orchestrator.

I would ask users to look at their automation use case and see if there is a need for certain functions. Often, people load different functions into a simple automation project, making it more complex.

Overall, I rate UiPath Orchestrator a seven out of ten.