UiPath Orchestrator is a stable solution.
RPA Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
The solution has good stability, but its UI should be improved and made more user-friendly
Pros and Cons
- "UiPath Orchestrator is a stable solution."
- "UiPath Orchestrator should improve its UI and make it more user-friendly."
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
UiPath Orchestrator should improve its UI and make it more user-friendly. The solution's governing policies feature could also be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been testing UiPath Orchestrator for a few months.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
UiPath Orchestrator is a scalable solution, but it would require a lot more configuration compared to other products to be able to scale effectively.
Buyer's Guide
UiPath Orchestrator
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about UiPath Orchestrator. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
845,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have previously worked with Aiwozo, Power Automate, and Automation Anywhere.
Aiwozo has a multi-tenanted architecture. So I like that about the product. The simple Kibana-style structure of moving processes from one environment to another and the rule-based password control policy are useful features of Aiwozo.
Multi-culture automation is something that quite a few of our international clients demand, and the ease with which I can switch from one language to another is also important to me. That is why I've recommended Aiwozo to most of my clients.
What other advice do I have?
UiPath Orchestrator has the capabilities. Compared to other programs, UiPath Orchestrator has some nuances that can be improved upon. The new-age automation tools, like Aiwozo, are a little easier to use than UiPath Orchestrator.
I would ask users to look at their automation use case and see if there is a need for certain functions. Often, people load different functions into a simple automation project, making it more complex.
Overall, I rate UiPath Orchestrator a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.


Buyer's Guide
Download our free UiPath Orchestrator Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Product Categories
Workload AutomationPopular Comparisons
Control-M
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Automic Automation
Buyer's Guide
Download our free UiPath Orchestrator Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which is Best: Scheduler Control M, CA or Tidal?
- When evaluating Workload Automation, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What should businesses start to automate first when starting off with an enterprise scheduling tool?
- What is the best workload automation tool in the market?
- How does Control-M rank in the Workload Automation market compared with other products?
- Should project automation software be integrated with cloud-based tools?
- Why is Workload Automation important for companies?