Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
2020-05-24T06:44:00Z
May 24, 2020
I would rate it an eight out of ten. In the next release, there should be a license audit. They should be able to do the license audit seamlessly. A lot of software tries to plug-in and we need to do that as well. The governance also needs improvement. We want more details like AI and the ability to scan things in.
I would definitely advise anyone to look at it, it is a good product. Quite stable and scalable. It has its own strengths compared to other solutions and it does its job well. Thycotic has other strengths for other kinds of requirements. For the requirements that we looked into, ARCON met the customer's needs. On a scale of 1 to 10, I'd rate ARCON ARSIM an eight. As a product, its technicality is good. There's nothing more that we could recommend. I'm just saying if you look at the complexity of implementation, it's not that it is hard, but unless you know how you cannot implement it properly. There is the issue of the graphics. The GUI interface display and reports that it generates could both be a little more user-friendly.
Vulnerability Management (VM) is a critical cybersecurity process focused on identifying, evaluating, and mitigating vulnerabilities in IT systems. It helps organizations protect their networks and assets by proactively managing security weaknesses before they can be exploited by threats.
I rate this solution eight out of 10.
I would rate it an eight out of ten. In the next release, there should be a license audit. They should be able to do the license audit seamlessly. A lot of software tries to plug-in and we need to do that as well. The governance also needs improvement. We want more details like AI and the ability to scan things in.
I would definitely advise anyone to look at it, it is a good product. Quite stable and scalable. It has its own strengths compared to other solutions and it does its job well. Thycotic has other strengths for other kinds of requirements. For the requirements that we looked into, ARCON met the customer's needs. On a scale of 1 to 10, I'd rate ARCON ARSIM an eight. As a product, its technicality is good. There's nothing more that we could recommend. I'm just saying if you look at the complexity of implementation, it's not that it is hard, but unless you know how you cannot implement it properly. There is the issue of the graphics. The GUI interface display and reports that it generates could both be a little more user-friendly.