When we face a problem, we search the documents to fix the issue. The solution does not crash. It is reliable and scalable. Overall, I rate the product a ten out of ten.
UNIX Security Consultant at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-07-26T09:52:52Z
Jul 26, 2022
My suggestion is to try before you buy so you know it's the right solution. It's not one-size-fits-all. The product has plenty of potential for growth, but the parts where we would like to see growth are not necessarily where the vendor is focusing its attention. I rate this solution seven out of 10.
My company is an implementer of Red Hat Ceph Storage. The solution was implemented for two or three customers in the FinTech field, but I don't recall using Red Hat Ceph Storage that often. My advice to others who may want to start using the solution is that its value is good, especially if you have an entire Red Hat environment, as that is when you'll have the best integration. My rating for Red Hat Ceph Storage is seven out of ten.
Red Hat Ceph Storage is working exactly as it should be. It's running in the background, and it's working, and it doesn't bother me. I would recommend Red Hat Ceph Storage. it is a good system. It is important they have knowledge or if they can find somebody to support them. It's not a good solution if you don't know what you're doing. I rate Red Hat Ceph Storage an eight out of ten.
Infrastructure Architect & CEO at Tirzok Private Limited
Real User
2022-02-17T12:41:00Z
Feb 17, 2022
Companies that can afford completely flash-based pipe servers should go for Ceph. It's a very performance-intensive, brilliant storage system, and I always recommend it to customers based on its benefits, performance, and scalability. I would rate it as eight out of ten.
What is software-defined storage? Software-defined storage (SDS) is a software-based storage solution that provides greater flexibility and independence than the traditional network-attached storage (NAS) or storage area network (SAN). Although software-defined storage can work in and on top of both NAS and SAN environments, it is usually created to perform on the industry common x86 servers.
Software-defined storage allows for separation and independence from traditional hardware...
When we face a problem, we search the documents to fix the issue. The solution does not crash. It is reliable and scalable. Overall, I rate the product a ten out of ten.
I rate Red Hat Ceph Storage a seven out of ten.
I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I would recommend others to use this product if they get the chance. I would rate the product a nine out of ten.
I would rate Red Hat Ceph Storage a seven out of ten.
My suggestion is to try before you buy so you know it's the right solution. It's not one-size-fits-all. The product has plenty of potential for growth, but the parts where we would like to see growth are not necessarily where the vendor is focusing its attention. I rate this solution seven out of 10.
My company is an implementer of Red Hat Ceph Storage. The solution was implemented for two or three customers in the FinTech field, but I don't recall using Red Hat Ceph Storage that often. My advice to others who may want to start using the solution is that its value is good, especially if you have an entire Red Hat environment, as that is when you'll have the best integration. My rating for Red Hat Ceph Storage is seven out of ten.
Red Hat Ceph Storage is working exactly as it should be. It's running in the background, and it's working, and it doesn't bother me. I would recommend Red Hat Ceph Storage. it is a good system. It is important they have knowledge or if they can find somebody to support them. It's not a good solution if you don't know what you're doing. I rate Red Hat Ceph Storage an eight out of ten.
Companies that can afford completely flash-based pipe servers should go for Ceph. It's a very performance-intensive, brilliant storage system, and I always recommend it to customers based on its benefits, performance, and scalability. I would rate it as eight out of ten.
We use the on-premises deployment model. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.