People must start using the product as soon as possible. It certainly will be the way we engineer in the future. It's already the way we are engineering. Organizations must invest time and effort to set it up and get it running. I rate the user-friendliness a five out of ten. However, I rate the product’s functionality a nine out of ten. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.
Group IT Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
2023-02-13T20:28:00Z
Feb 13, 2023
I recommend the solution and rate it a seven out of ten, only because there are more powerful tools in the market. It really depends on use cases. Enterprises or very fast paced organizations might need more automations. Public services don't change much or have dynamic needs.
We are not running the newest version of the solution. My advice to others wanting to implement this solution would be for them to be properly organized. The teams need to be familiar with the features and know how to structure the repositories and start things right at the beginning. It takes a long time to fix things if you didn't configure the governance properly at the beginning. I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Sparx Prolaborate a nine out of ten.
Group Product Manager – Billing and Payments at MultiChoice Group
Real User
2021-08-17T19:19:02Z
Aug 17, 2021
Modeling tools have evolved in the marketplace, and today modern product development teams require a lot of online collaborations, and a part of that is the ability to easily visualize business processes. Sparx doesn't have great visualization. Tools such as MURAL, Figma, Lucidchart, and Lucidspark are much better than Sparx in terms of visualization. I know it wasn't designed for that, but as a modeling tool, it is important to be able to visualize a model in an easy way. I would rate this solution a six out of 10.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sparx Systems, SAP LeanIX, BOC Group and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: December 2024.
Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) solutions are designed to help organizations effectively plan, design, and manage their enterprise architecture. These tools provide a comprehensive view of an organization's business processes, IT systems, and their relationships, enabling better decision-making and alignment between business and IT strategies.
People must start using the product as soon as possible. It certainly will be the way we engineer in the future. It's already the way we are engineering. Organizations must invest time and effort to set it up and get it running. I rate the user-friendliness a five out of ten. However, I rate the product’s functionality a nine out of ten. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.
I recommend the solution and rate it a seven out of ten, only because there are more powerful tools in the market. It really depends on use cases. Enterprises or very fast paced organizations might need more automations. Public services don't change much or have dynamic needs.
I would rate it a seven out of ten.
We are not running the newest version of the solution. My advice to others wanting to implement this solution would be for them to be properly organized. The teams need to be familiar with the features and know how to structure the repositories and start things right at the beginning. It takes a long time to fix things if you didn't configure the governance properly at the beginning. I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Sparx Prolaborate a nine out of ten.
Modeling tools have evolved in the marketplace, and today modern product development teams require a lot of online collaborations, and a part of that is the ability to easily visualize business processes. Sparx doesn't have great visualization. Tools such as MURAL, Figma, Lucidchart, and Lucidspark are much better than Sparx in terms of visualization. I know it wasn't designed for that, but as a modeling tool, it is important to be able to visualize a model in an easy way. I would rate this solution a six out of 10.