What advice do you have for others considering Tricentis NeoLoad?

Anyone can use the product, but it is important to create templates to focus on, especially if someone wants the business transactions to be easily captured in NeoLoad. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Tricentis NeoLoad offers excellent support for SAP-based applications, while open-source competitor tools like JMeter are unable to provide the same support. One competitor tool called OpenText LoadRunner supports SAP applications but not in a cost-effective way, like Tricentis NeoLoad. The real-time analysis feature of Tricentis NeoLoad is a valuable feature and we haven't faced any issues in the testing process. The scripting and auto-correlation features of Tricentis NeoLoad have helped our organization improve testing efficiency. The solution's technical feature stack is more than enough for the present IT industry. I would recommend Tricentis NeoLoad to others. At our company, we compare Tricentis NeoLoad with other tools to give our clients an overview and weigh the pros and cons of each. Our company also gives a score to each tool, and Tricentis NeoLoad tops the chart. One industry trend is mobile user experience, for which Tricentis NeoLoad has integrated the latest technologies and partnered with a third-party mobile platform provider. Another noticeable industry trend is reliability testing, which is different from performance testing and for which there are other tools in the market. Overall, I would rate Tricentis NeoLoad a nine out of ten.

I rate the product a nine out of ten. Based on factors like budget constraints and specific performance testing needs, I would recommend Tricentis NeoLoad to others. However, if budget is a concern and similar activities can be achieved with tools like JMeter, that could also be a viable option.

I would recommend using this solution. If the person or if the company or someone cannot afford it... for example, if LoadRunner is a thousand dollars and this one [NeoLoad] is seven hundred dollars, something like that... if the client is genuinely looking at pricing and they don't have a high budget, there are budget issues in the project... In that case, if they cannot afford LoadRunner, NeoLoad is definitely preferable as another best-licensed tool, better than JMeter. JMeter is obviously open-source, but NeoLoad is better. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Tricentis NeoLoad proves to be an excellent tool for supporting both SAP and non-SAP applications seamlessly. Its standout feature lies in the impressive reusability of Tosca scripts. If you have Tosca installed for desktop automation, leveraging the existing Tosca scripts becomes a seamless transition to using Tricentis NeoLoad. In summary, I would give Tricentis NeoLoad a rating of nine out of ten.

I would recommend Tricentis NeoLoad to other users. Overall, I rate Tricentis NeoLoad a nine out of ten.

I would recommend the solution to others. However, my recommendation would depend on other parameters like the extent of testing and investment that they may want to do. There is some investment associated with it. It may not be justified if they are just doing load testing as one of the activities. Considering the ease of use, technical setup, and level of support provided, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side. From the cost perspective, users should consider whether the solution is useful for them from a long-term or short-term point of view while also considering the integrations and loads they plan to manage with the solution. I recommend Tricentis NeoLoad and LoadRunner to those planning to purchase a solution. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. There are certain areas that need improvements in NeoLoad, like UI, correlation templates, and more.

It's definitely worth a try. Compared to LoadRunner and other tools, it gives more flexibility and is easier to maintain. Overall, I'd rate Tricentis NeoLoad a seven out of ten.

The buyers should make a purchase decision depending on the usage of their project protocols. They should use the solution if they have to deal with a load on-premises. It is quite a good product compared with other solutions. But working better for on-premises setup doesn't make it an exceptional product. If you're working with web API only, better products are available. I rate the solution as a seven out of ten.

I give the solution an eight out of ten. We have three people using the solution in our organization. As long as the organization's requirements are met, I recommend Tricentis NeoLoad.

We would rate this solution a six out of ten.

Right now, six people use Tricentis NeoLoad within the company. Two people take care of the deployment of Tricentis NeoLoad, and two to three people handle its maintenance. There's a plan to increase usage for Tricentis NeoLoad, mainly because my company is trying to explore more tool features. If it's easier to integrate Tricentis NeoLoad with third-party monitoring tools, then usage could be increased. My advice to others planning to implement Tricentis NeoLoad is to first look into the applications to be tested because there's a limitation in the tool right now, particularly the feasibility of testing Web and Citrix Desk applications. There's also no support for other applications. If you need testing for different protocols, for example, Oracle or JDBC database applications, you'll need to use a different tool because Tricentis NeoLoad currently doesn't have compatibility. It's better first to find out what applications you want to test, your testing goal, and if that would be compatible with Tricentis NeoLoad. I'm rating Tricentis NeoLoad as seven out of ten.

I give the solution nine out of ten. In older versions, the network protocol only supported up to six users per ID. The latest version 9.4 has been improved by increasing the number of users per ID to 30. With this solution, you can add users to Tricentis NeoLoad Web so they can visit the site and see what is happening. When running a load test the users have read-only access and can see what is happening on the server side with the number of requests in use, the throughput, and the failure rate. JMeter is another solution that can support all the protocols but we found that it was not recording properly and would not allow us to customize as required so we chose this solution. Any person thinking of using this solution must have a minimum knowledge of gathering and using variables, and be familiar with performance testing and JavaScript in order to operate successfully.

This is a user-friendly and straightforward solution with a good support system. Unlike JMeter or LoadRunner, it doesn't require significant coding knowledge. I rate this solution eight out of 10.

I don't have much experience with JMeter, so I don't know much about the differences between the products except that JMeter is open-source and NeoLoad is licenced, proprietary software. On a scale of one to 10, I would rate Tricentis NeoLoad as seven.

I'm using the latest version of Tricentis NeoLoad. In my company, two people from the performance testing department use Tricentis NeoLoad. My rating for Tricentis NeoLoad is eight out of ten. My advice to others looking to start using Tricentis NeoLoad is that it's a good product, and it would be money well spent. My company is into product development, and it's a user or a customer of Tricentis NeoLoad.

I would encourage others to take a look at this solution. It is a good solution and they maintain the technical expertise needed for success. I rate Tricentis NeoLoad an eight out of ten.

I'm rating Tricentis NeoLoad seven out of ten, while Micro Focus LoadRunner I'm rating a five out of ten. I'm not giving Tricentis NeoLoad a score of ten because I want to see more out of it in terms of integration, particularly how it integrates with other Tricentis products. There is a customized version for BlazeMeter, but it's a solution that cannot be compared with either Micro Focus LoadRunner or Tricentis NeoLoad, because it is more of an open source solution, so you do not get support that's comparable with the support you get from paid solutions.

Newer additions such as NeoLoad SAP, Citrix, NeoLoad Web, etc. are excellent extensions with a broad range of new functions. Organizations should be aware that there are limited videos available on the internet regarding NeoLoad so they should ensure that they receive proper training from the reseller/integrator upon purchase.

I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. I wouldn't give it a 10 because there are some issues that need to be resolved from the tool side. Before using the tool, you need to understand the product you are going to design, the different types of performance applications that you are going to do performance testing with, and whether or not NeoLoad supports it. If yes, then go ahead. Otherwise, I would say go back to LoadRunner because whatever the application is, LoadRunner will support it.

NeoLoad is a good tool for banking or telecom applications. When compared with the LoadRunner, NeoLoad will support almost all necessary features including reporting. It is a good tool. Overall, I would rate the solution at a six out of ten.

If you are dealing only with web HTTP, you can definitely go ahead with this solution because time is money. I would rate NeoLoad an eight out of 10.

We're currently looking for a NeoLoad alternative. I prefer dynamic tools because we should be able to change the script and NeoLoad didn't allow us to do that. I'm looking for a tool that will allow for a weekly or monthly script change and provide us with the ability to update whatever has been recorded. I would rate this solution a seven out of 10.