Imperva Web Application Firewall Reviews

Name: Imperva Web Application Firewall
Brand: Imperva
Rating: 4.3 (52 reviews)

Vendor: Imperva

4.3 out of 5

52 reviews
97% willing to recommend

768 followers

Post review

What is Imperva Web Application Firewall?

Imperva Web Application Firewall is a versatile solution that protects web applications and databases from various attacks, including DDoS, cross-site scripting, and SQL injection attacks. It offers data security, availability, and access control and can be deployed on-premises or on the cloud.

Get the Imperva Web Application Firewall Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Imperva Web Application Firewall, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and more!

Imperva Web Application Firewall is the #6 ranked solution in top Web Application Firewalls. PeerSpot users give Imperva Web Application Firewall an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. Imperva Web Application Firewall is most commonly compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks: Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. Imperva Web Application Firewall is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 62% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 17% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Imperva Web Application Firewall

January 2025

Get the report

Helped 830,824 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Abdullah Jin

Principal Cyber Prevent and Defense Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Support is one thing I wish Imperva could improve. They follow the phone model and keep rotating you from one customer service person to another. The layer one support isn't very clear about the workings of the product. My feedback is primarily about Imperva Cloud, not on-premise. On-premise is a whole new story. Support is the issue for Imperva Cloud. It's also a bit pricey. It's a premium service and very expensive. The licensing model is not very straightforward. Every feature is priced separately, and to enjoy maximum protection, you'll have to spend a lot of money. The licensing model is a bit complex, and each feature is very pricey. For example, API security and web application protection are two separate license packages.

Read full review

Mitesh D Patel

Senior Technical Consultant- Cyber Security at Ivalue Infosolution

It does bring value. For example, consider a BFSI customer. Their application is critical and represents their brand. Without a WAF, an attack could take their application down, harming their reputation. It leads to hampering the customer's workflow. With an Imperva WAF, they protect against attacks like DDoS or SQL injection, ensuring their application remains available and customers are happy. That's the main benefit for both the customer and the organization. The impact depends on the customer's use case. If their business primarily operates online, a CDN is beneficial for traffic optimization. Moreover, the integration options depend on the specific use case of our customers. Generally, integration capabilities are good with SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) parts.

Read full review

RullySaputra

Technical Consultant at Truvisor

Imperva Cloud WAF would be the most powerful option. It uses cloud-based signatures, which are constantly updated. This is different from the on-premises version, where the signature updates might be less frequent. Imperva has basic reporting templates. We can use those, and we can also create custom reports. However, customization is limited to labels and structure – we can't change the actual content of the reports. For that, we need to use Imperva Compass. Overall, I would rate the user experience an eight out of ten, with ten being good experience.

Read full review

Imperva Web Application Firewall mindshare

As of January 2025, the mindshare of Imperva Web Application Firewall in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category stands at 6.2%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

PeerAnalyst reports

Type	Title	Date
Category	Web Application Firewall (WAF)	Jan 15, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jan 15, 2025	Download
Comparison	Imperva Web Application Firewall vs AWS WAF	Jan 15, 2025	Download
Comparison	Imperva Web Application Firewall vs F5 Advanced WAF	Jan 15, 2025	Download
Comparison	Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway	Jan 15, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks	4.2	2.4%	98%	108 interviews Add to research
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway	3.6	10.0%	78%	46 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

"The solution can be configured in just a couple of minutes."
"The valuable features of Imperva WAF include its effective security breach prevention through automatically updating rules."
"Protection is the best solution since it has profile functionality."

Room for Improvement

"There is nothing specific where the application firewall is falling short."
"The product's customization capabilities are a bit problematic, requiring support cases for backend modifications."
"If they can bring in generative AI features, that would be useful."

ROI

Imperva Web Application Firewall offers a proactive approach to prevent issues before they arise, particularly benefiting enterprises facing DDoS attacks. Despite the high cost, the ROI can be substantial, with cases recouping investments within six months. Especially in critical sectors like banking, firms experience clear ROI by safeguarding core systems. Users observe significant time savings as Imperva mitigates DDoS threats and blocks application attacks, allowing teams to focus on higher-value tasks.

Pricing

Imperva Web Application Firewall tends to be expensive, with licensing costs ranging significantly based on deployment type and features. Users noted it can be very affordable, especially with cloud-based, managed solutions aiding in cost savings. Licensing models vary, including annual subscriptions for specific features. While noted as comparably high, the solution offers comprehensive protection. Costs can escalate with separate licensing requirements, but users benefit from a flexible pricing model depending on infrastructure and operational needs.

"It's an excellent product, but it can be very costly."
"The price is high compared to other solutions like FortiWeb."
"It is very costly, but the return on investment is very high. Its cost was around $70,000, and we got it back in just six months."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Imperva Web Application Firewall Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Retailer

Government

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

Real Estate/Law Firm

Comms Service Provider

Energy/Utilities Company

Hospitality Company

University

Media Company

Non Profit

Pharma/Biotech Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Legal Firm

Wholesaler/Distributor

Transportation Company

Performing Arts

Logistics Company

Consumer Goods Company

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Engineering Company

Compare Imperva Web Application Firewall with alternative products

Learn more about Imperva Web Application Firewall

The solution has good security against web attacks and offers advanced bot protection, API security, and mitigation features. Imperva WAF is easy to configure and deploy; it has good customer service and an excellent user interface.