This is what we're using LeanIX for: clients come to us with a lot of apps they want to manage. There are too many apps out there, so they're not quite sure which app is doing what, so they come to us to rationalize these things, and they want to make sure that the landscape of the apps that they have are functional and actually fit their purpose. We utilize LeanIX for assessing the apps, and we come up with integrations. For example: how these applications are talking to each other, how data is exchanged, etc.
We then come up with a target application landscape: which apps we'd maintain and which apps we'd sunset. From the CXO level, they'd get the overall view, in particular, how the IT landscape is, and that will help them increase capability and make it more aligned with their business needs.
What I find most valuable in LeanIX is its reporting feature. It provides very nice, built-in reports, like the time series report, etc. It's quite useful, especially if you want to present it to the CXO team. Our CXO team likes the way the reports have been built. It's also very easy to create the reports.
LeanIX is also intuitive, so it's quite a good tool to have. It's really easy to use compared to other tools.
What could be improved in LeanIX is the reporting aspect, in particular the variety of reports. If they could give us more drilled down reports, for example: if we can get more reports that can answer the question: "When the business is actually spending money, how can that translate into benefits?" that would be great. At times, we'd need customized reports, so more reporting varieties would be good.
The data import feature of LeanIX could also be improved, if they can give us more flexibility in terms of importing data across different data sources, that would be good. More generic, more lucid data importing would make the service better.
Feature-wise, if we compare LeanIX with industry leading tools such as MEGA and other competitors, there are certain features that aren't there, but those tools were built for something more holistic, so overall, LeanIX is fine for me.
I've used LeanIX for the last two to three years.
LeanIX is a stable tool. It's really good, especially in terms of usability.
I have not used LeanIX for a very complex IT landscape, so I'm unable to comment on how scalable it is.
I find the technical support for LeanIX helpful.
Deploying LeanIX isn't that difficult, especially when you compare it with other tools, e.g. MEGA. Configuring it is not that difficult. It's quite easy to install it.
How long the deployment takes would depend on the complexity of the IT landscape. Deploying LeanIX could take one week, two weeks, or it could take a month, depending on the difficulty of the landscape you're in.
We didn't use a third-party or a consultant to deploy the service because it's cloud-based.
In terms of LeanIX deployment, we have a tier for it, they just provide us with cloud instances, and we use those.
LeanIX is quite good because they just try to focus on the modern aspects of the applications and how the business evolves. I'm fine with their vision. The good part about LeanIX is that it is quite a new tool. When you have an old tool, they do have a lot of features, but the problem is that they have certain legacy thoughts, but LeanIX doesn't have that "baggage of thoughts", as it is a new tool. Instead, it has a modern way of thinking, and that's a good way to start.
I'm not part of the Procurement Department, so I'm unable to comment on the pricing for the tool, but in general, because it's cloud-based, it's normally cheaper. It's quite popular because the overall pricing comes down a lot when you deploy tools on the cloud.
My advice to others looking into implementing LeanIX is that it's a pretty good tool if they're looking to reduce costs, but still want better IT. If cost is their primary consideration, then LeanIX is a really a good tool.
I'm giving LeanIX a rating of eight out of ten.