OpenText UFT Developer Reviews

Name: OpenText UFT Developer
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 3.7 (37 reviews)

Vendor: OpenText

3.7 out of 5

37 reviews
76% willing to recommend

2,253 followers

Post review

What is OpenText UFT Developer?

With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.

Get the OpenText UFT Developer Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT Developer, Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One and more!

OpenText UFT Developer is the #14 ranked solution in top Test Automation Tools and #15 ranked solution in top Functional Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText UFT Developer an average rating of 7.4 out of 10. OpenText UFT Developer is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: OpenText UFT Developer vs Tricentis Tosca. OpenText UFT Developer is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 79% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 21% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer

November 2024

Get the report

Helped 816,562 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Mohamed Bosri

Process Architect Referent at Forvia

Our use case involves functionality for a system ERP. We work with Deviation, which is stable and receives positive feedback from users OpenText UFT Developer allows junior testers to learn through open source and online resources like YouTube. They can find solutions to issues even if the…

Read full review

Eitan Gold

SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

In my opinion, the price is too high. It could be improved. The support for .NET Framework and Visual Studio in Micro Focus UFT Developer is currently limited. At present, only Visual Studio 2019 is supported, despite the release of a newer version (2022). Similarly, the tool only supports up to .NET Framework version 4.3.8, while there have been six newer versions released. This is an area that could be improved upon, particularly in the Windows environment.

Read full review

Shyam_Prasad

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. When I had challenges with scheduler and calendar control recognition challenges, I faced unresponsiveness. OpenText support (previously Micro Focus) and even SmartBear (OpenText Complete provider) just said , "The current version does not support it." They did not give me a roadmap. The challenge with big companies is that "it is what it is" and don't address customer problems directly. Wherever, Eggplant was a niche player, stepped in and readily demonstrated its support capabilities to solve my issue.

Read full review

OpenText UFT Developer mindshare

Product category:

As of November 2024, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Developer in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 2.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Nov 7, 2024

Valuable Features

"OpenText UFT Developer works well with record technology, making it valuable for recording."
"In UFT, it's a simple click to insert the checkpoints."
"I like the tool because we can still access the devices' distance. It's not important where you're working. For example, I can use it in Brazil, Chile, and other parts where people are working. After the pandemic, many companies use it for homework. I think using it to administer and manage the devices is very good and effective."

Room for Improvement

"The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites."
"There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad."
"Stability depends on the company's infrastructure and end-to-end infrastructure. When I used the tool in my project, we had a big problem with many users using it simultaneously."

Pricing

"If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."
"The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."
"Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our OpenText UFT Developer Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.