Amazon S3 Glacier Reviews

The solution is used to store data.

The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally. So, we have two or three copies of our data. We’re pretty sure that once it's uploaded, it's available. We can move it to less expensive storage if we don't use it. The way of working is very intelligent. It's very useful.

It's up to us to decide how many copies we need and how frequently we want to make copies. Whether we want a fast or slow disk, cheap or expensive, it’s up to us as architects. We have a lot of choices. It's a product that has been working for a very long time. Most remarks from customers have been dealt with. Everything a customer could want is available.

The tool could be made cheaper. We always need the internet to access the tool. If our network goes down, we cannot access the information.

I have been using the solution for five to six years.

We do not have any issues with the product’s stability. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The tool’s scalability is very good. We have no problems with it. We have 4000 to 5000 users. The solution is used regularly. We have plans to increase the usage in the future.

The product is cloud-based. The setup is very easy. The deployment took ten minutes. It’s very fast. To deploy the product, we must select the type of disk we need, create the interface to our account, and then start using it. It is very straightforward and very easy. The solution is so easy that we do not need any technical people.

The solution costs around 9 cents per data forum per month. The tool is very cheap.

It's a good product. We must remember that it's already been copied two or three times by AWS. We don't need to set up a copy ourselves. It is a big advantage. We can try to separate our data between different regions. So, if one region goes down, we still have our data in another. It’s a good practice.

We can't improve the product without increasing the cost. People can use two or three S3s to make it more secure. However, forcing all users into the same setup is not in AWS's best interest. There’s an advantage in going to the cloud. If an organization needs big security and has well-trained people, they can implement it. However, a very small company that doesn’t need that security won't pay for it.

Overall, I rate the product a ten out of ten.

Amazon S3 Glacier is primarily used for archiving data. We use it for long-term data storage, especially in industries that require data to be kept for extensive periods, like financial sectors and banks. Amazon S3 Glacier gives control over the duration of data storage and its removal.

Moving our archival data to Glacier has saved our operational costs. This cost-effectiveness allows us to allocate resources to other operations.

The most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier are its cost-effectiveness for data archiving and its durability. Its auto-scaling capabilities allow us to add data continuously without needing to pre-provision storage.

I would like to see improvements in the transfer rate as it takes quite a long time to retrieve data from Glacier compared to standard S3 storage. Additionally, improvements in configuration management and tab management, such as providing pre-set templates for setting policies, would enhance user experience.

I have been working with Amazon S3 Glacier for two to three years. Each project has its own needs, and not all require data archival.

Amazon S3 Glacier is quite stable, nine out of ten. There are rare instances where regional issues could cause some outages, but overall it's reliable.

Amazon S3 Glacier auto-scales according to the data. It continues to scale as more data is added, without the need for initial provisioning. I would rate its scalability a ten out of ten.

I have not interacted with technical support for Amazon S3 Glacier since I have not encountered issues that required it.

Positive

Before Amazon S3 Glacier, we used general S3 storage for our archives, which was quite expensive. Organizations also stored data on hard drives or on-prem setups.

The initial setup of Amazon S3 Glacier is quite easy. For someone familiar with the service, it hardly takes any time. It could be a challenge for those new to it, who might need some preparation.

The deployment can be managed by one knowledgeable person, and ongoing management requires minimal involvement since it's a self-maintained service.

The transition to Amazon S3 Glacier has saved us on operational costs, allowing us to invest in other parts of the organization.

I would rate the pricing a seven. While it's generally cost-effective, the pricing model could be clearer. It's challenging to understand, as it varies based on time and usage.

For block storage, S3 is the main option. Other options like EBS or EFS are available but are more expensive and less scalable.

It's important to understand the purpose of Amazon S3 Glacier. Ensure calculations regarding data needs and archiving strategies are in place before using it. Have a plan ready for data retrieval that accounts for the time required.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I use the solution for storage. We use it for application data storage and retrieval and for data backup. It has various use cases for storing applications, platforms, or other data types.

I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in a simpler manner. 

I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3 Glacier's reporting system somewhat confusing compared to other hyperscalers in the market.

In terms of improvements, I believe AWS could enhance the service by providing regional accelerators to reduce network latency and offering options for caching buckets for easier configuration. Additionally, providing options to specify usage duration for particular sessions or partitions would be beneficial. While it is intuitive to some extent, there is room for improvement to make it even more user-friendly.

I have been using the product for two years. 

Monitoring apps and systems should be part of deployment. You should be able to set up auto-scaling and alerts during deployment. For example, you could get a warning if CPU usage hits 70 percent and a critical alert at 80 percent.

We haven't come across many instances of large data volume. However, when we encounter it, it seems to be more about ensuring that our applications can handle the workload. Fortunately, we haven't experienced any significant lag issues. 

I haven't contacted the support team yet. We don't have any specific support package from Amazon for the services we're using. Instead, we rely on Amazon's public support. 

Amazon S3 Glacier's deployment is straightforward. The deployment process typically involves several steps. Firstly, you must acquire the image, select the appropriate zone, and deploy it within it. Following that, you would define the necessary parameters. In my experience, I've mostly worked with virtual machines rather than containers.

Typically, a team of just one person is sufficient for deployment and maintenance, maybe with a mentor. 

I've operated with Amazon S3 Glacier in two modes. Firstly, there's the trial mode, where I experimented with the platform, learned its functionalities, and applied it to my work. Secondly, there's the corporate account mode, where my team handles the operations, and I receive billing reports. 

I haven't extensively used the retrieval options. Generally, we haven't encountered any significant issues with the service, although occasional network latency might occur due to various factors such as server positioning. However, the retrieval process has been fairly reliable.

Rating the tool on a scale from one to ten is quite challenging. It's akin to comparing different brands of ovens, such as Murphy Richards, Samsung, or LG. All of them are excellent in performing their basic function. However, the differences lie in their operation, user interface, and user-friendliness. Similarly, AWS stands out as a leader in virtual services, but comparing it directly to others is not straightforward.

I rate it a nine out of ten. The tool's integration into existing workflows is simple. Whether or not to recommend it depends on the requirements of the individual or organization. It's essential to assess what kind of data they intend to use it for and what their data needs are. Appropriate recommendations can be made based on these factors and other qualifying queries.

I use Amazon S3 Glacier for archival storage of data.

Amazon S3 Glacier can integrate seamlessly with other AWS services.

Amazon S3 Glacier's data retrieval time is slow compared to other AWS storage services and should be improved.

I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for three years.

Amazon S3 Glacier is a stable solution.

Amazon S3 Glacier is a scalable solution. Thousands of users are using Amazon S3 Glacier globally.

Amazon S3 Glacier's initial setup is easy.

Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving.

Users should choose Amazon S3 Glacier depending on their requirements. If someone wants to keep their data for ten years, they should use Amazon S3 Glacier. On the other hand, if someone wants to keep their data for one year, there is no need to use the solution.

Overall, I rate Amazon S3 Glacier a nine out of ten.

We use the solution for storage. We store photos, attachments, and different objects.

You need a strategic approach. You also need to consider the technical abilities of the person utilizing the platform to fully understand it. 

Some things are learned as you use the platform. You need to consider what you want to store, how long you will store it, and its usefulness. You need to have a proper storage plan. While understanding the platform is crucial, you must also understand the business side because you must pay for the licenses and storage you use. It's about balancing the technical and business aspects of the tool.

Amazon S3 Glacier is easy to use. The platform is straightforward, and the interfaces are user-friendly and responsive. Even with a limited budget, you can train someone without an AWS certification to use it. With on-the-job training, you can ensure they understand what needs to be done to use the service.

The cost can be lower. Sometimes, users may access the platform, advertise it, and then receive a bill they cannot afford. It would be helpful if there were a policy where a budget owner could understand the costs associated with storing data and approve expenditures based on the project budget. Due to the retrieval options, SMMEs may be ignorant of the costs and cannot afford the platform.

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability as ten out of ten.

It's pretty scalable. Yeah, it has potential if you have a demand, and they can meet it. They are perfect on their end, but you must also protect your infrastructure and data. There are some shortfalls or pitfalls that you need to ensure that you cover.

I rate the solution's scalability as ten out of ten.

The initial setup is straightforward because you use their dashboard and user interface. As long as you subscribe, it's easy to set up.

You need to comply with the requirements and ensure that you understand what it is that you need to do.

The product is expensive. They price you as you use it.

It works perfectly if you start to chat. You learn these things as you use it because it involves technical ability, pricing, and ensuring that you comply with government requirements.

Despite the speed limitations, the Amazon S3 Glacier performs well. As long as you have a network and store your data within your region, the data centers within EMA are quite responsive regarding data retrieval.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

The solution is used for backup purposes. We had it for some of our customers for their static file needs a couple of years ago.

The product is very straightforward. It is the most feature-rich platform. The solution performs well.

The product’s pricing must be improved. It's one of the most pricey object storage solutions on the market.

I have been using the solution for more than five years.

The tool is very stable.

The tool is scalable. In theory, its scalability is limitless. The product is used by systems. We have implemented it for three to four customers a year ago.

The initial setup is very easy. It takes less than an hour to deploy the tool. To deploy it, we create an AWS account on the portal. Then, we create an object storage bucket, give some permissions to it, and make some configurations on the source platform. If it is a code-based integration, we must give an ARN into our coding platform. If it’s going to be a Veeam platform, we must provide the Veeam platform with a username and password in the configurations.

We pay a monthly license fee for the solution. We pay for what we use. Pricing is the biggest disadvantage of the solution.

Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for long-term backups. We take database backups and synchronize them to Glacier after 30 days. We also use it as part of our disaster recovery.

We sync to S3 and transfer to Glacier. It is a slow system in terms of performance. Also, it's cheap. It takes several hours to retrieve data if you need something from it.

There's no storage limit, and the price is excellent.

Glacier could provide easy browsing.

I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for five years.

I don't have to monitor the solution.

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

Only I am using this solution.

I rate the solution’s scalability a ten out of ten.

I've used the amazon support.

We have used Egnyte and switched to Amazon S3 Glacier because it is cheap.

The initial setup was easy. I set up a management plan to automatically move old files into Glacier. We already had backups going into S3. So, I configured the system to automatically transfer some of those backups to Glacier storage within minutes.

We did the setup of the solution in-house.

I rate the product’s pricing a one out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

Considered whether to archive files before putting them in the cloud.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We use Amazon S3 Glacier mainly for block storage.

Amazon S3 Glacier is an easy-to-use solution.

Amazon S3 Glacier is a cheaper tool if you're running it on-prem, but it is expensive if deployed on the cloud.

I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for two years.

We didn't have any issues at all with the solution's stability because we were using the AWS cloud environment.

Amazon S3 Glacier is a scalable solution. Around ten users are using the solution in our organization.

The solution’s initial setup is very easy.

Amazon S3 Glacier has a good pricing point, and you pay for what's being used.

Our company chose Amazon S3 Glacier because it's the most widely used platform. The solution has good documentation, and it has a lot of user groups. Once you get used to the solution, it's very easy to work with, and you get to know the configuration process. The solution has very good monitoring and an easy setup.

Amazon S3 Glacier is worth the money for somebody who is using it.

Overall, I rate Amazon S3 Glacier ten out of ten.