I work in a school. We have a lot of graphics, videos, pictures, and multimedia data. We use the solution for data backup.
Assistant IT Manager at The American Baccalaureate School
The product is easy to use, and data restoration is not complicated, but the stability and pricing must be improved
Pros and Cons
- "The product is easy to use."
- "The stability must be improved."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The product is easy to use. The restoration is not as complicated as we thought it would be. Thankfully, there hasn't been a situation where we had to recover everything.
What needs improvement?
The stability must be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for almost two years.
Buyer's Guide
Amazon S3 Glacier
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Amazon S3 Glacier. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The tool is stable. I rate the stability a six or seven out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability depends upon the product’s versions. Generally, the tool is scalable. Currently, we are backing up around 9 to 10 TB of our data.
How are customer service and support?
The support is good. The support team is quite helpful.
How was the initial setup?
We need the vendor’s support during the initial setup. The deployment took about five working days. We had to engage with the vendor and have multiple sessions. We scheduled the deployment and got it done.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay a monthly licensing fee. The pricing must be improved. The solution must provide discounts for the education sector.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
DevOps Engineer
A stable solution that helps with migration
Pros and Cons
- "We use the solution for migration."
- "The product takes more time to secure data when the bandwidth is low."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for migration.
What needs improvement?
The product takes more time to secure data when the bandwidth is low.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with the product for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the product's stability an eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the product's scalability a nine out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate the product a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Amazon S3 Glacier
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Amazon S3 Glacier. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cloud architect at DTech Cloud
Reliable platform with secure data encryption features
Pros and Cons
- "The deployment process was straightforward."
- "The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times."
What is our primary use case?
We use the platform for building data packages and storage, which involves efficient data handling and backup solutions.
What is most valuable?
The platform provides reliable and scalable storage, secure data encryption, and easy data retrieval options.
What needs improvement?
The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for more than four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is highly stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is highly scalable.
How are customer service and support?
We rarely need technical support due to the comprehensive documentation available. However, the response time needs improvement.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment process was straightforward and typically takes 15 to 30 minutes, depending on the configuration requirements.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is average and reasonable. It varies depending on the region.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend Amazon S3 Glacier an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Jul 17, 2024
Flag as inappropriateTest Automation Lead at Entrotsust technlogies
Easy to setup, highly scalable and offers good stability
Pros and Cons
- "The reliability of storage is the main benefit."
- "The pricing is a bit expensive. There is room for improvement in costs."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for our products, mainly as a source for some data, like a type of S3 bucket.
How has it helped my organization?
It's mostly used for current product data, not archival data. We use it for things like customer demos, training for customers, and also storing large configuration files.
What is most valuable?
The reliability of storage is the main benefit.
What needs improvement?
The pricing is a bit expensive. There is room for improvement in costs.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for a couple of years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. It is a very scalable solution.
There are around 50 end users using this solution. We do plan to increase the further usage.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward once you get used to it. It's automated for us now, so in that sense, it's very easy.
What about the implementation team?
We need about ten DevOps guys for the deployment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay a monthly licensing fee. It is expensive.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I would recommend using this solution.
I would suggest just go through thorough AWS training and some of the training courseification programs.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Feb 6, 2024
Flag as inappropriateIt at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The solution is very comprehensive, but it is difficult to deploy and use
Pros and Cons
- "It is a very comprehensive tool."
- "The product is difficult to use."
What is our primary use case?
If I construct many web servers, it would need network and OS settings. It would also need security. Amazon is a comprehensive solution.
What is most valuable?
The product has many files and graphics. It is a very comprehensive tool.
What needs improvement?
The product is difficult to use.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The tool is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The tool is scalable. I am the only user.
How are customer service and support?
Support costs us more. So, we do not contact support. There are no good companies in Japan that provide support for Amazon.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is complex. The deployment takes two to three days. I studied an Udemy course to do it. It was difficult.
What other advice do I have?
Programmers and system engineers do not find the tool to be difficult. However, it is difficult for others. I would not recommend it to many people. Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Owner at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Dedicated to archiving and good support
Pros and Cons
- "The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us."
- "There is room for improvement in handling GDPR compliance better. GDPR is about personal data protection and retention. It would be great if S3 Glacier could handle compliance items related to this, especially with upcoming legislation like the California law, which restricts data storage time and allows users to request data deletion."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for archiving.
What is most valuable?
The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us.
So that's a good thing because you don't have to pay a lot when you don't use your data.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in handling GDPR compliance better. GDPR is about personal data protection and retention. It would be great if S3 Glacier could handle compliance items related to this, especially with upcoming legislation like the California law, which restricts data storage time and allows users to request data deletion.
Currently, if you're using Azure, you have to bring data back in a tiered process, which can be slow. If S3 Glacier could handle compliance more efficiently, it would add value.
Because GDPR is coming, and it will monitor data retention. In Quebec, we have Rule 25, which concerns data property and the ability to request data deletion. Handling this directly from Glacier would be a significant improvement.
How are customer service and support?
The customer service and support were good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price is fair. I would rate the pricing model a two out of ten, with one being the lowest price and ten being the highest price.
What other advice do I have?
Maybe avoid reading data from S3 Glacier or processing data from there, as it can be very slow.
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Solution architect at a integrator with 51-200 employees
Reasonably priced with a good licensing model, and no installation is required
Pros and Cons
- "We like that the price is cheaper."
- "I would like to see the retrieval time reduced."
What is our primary use case?
We use Amazon S3 Glacier for HPE 3PAR saving, content restoration, and deep storage for hosted data storage.
What is most valuable?
We like that the price is cheaper.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see the retrieval time reduced. You have to wait a day to get your data.
You have to wait for six servers and generate your request to get your data out. If that time period could be reduced to an hour that would be an advantage.
It would be helpful to have an Emulator tool to mount the storage without the need for a third party. Normally, when we mount Amazon s3 Glacier onto, an on-premises solution we need the Emulator tool. It would be great if there was direct access to mount it.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Amazon S3 for two years.
It's a cloud-based solution. We are always using the latest version.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have never communicated with technical support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are working with the standard Amazon S3, and Amazon S3 Glacier.
Previously, we did not work with any other solution. Amazon S3 Glacier was the first one that we used.
How was the initial setup?
It's a cloud-based solution, there is no installation.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is no license, you pay for what you use.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to other users who are interested in using it.
I would rate Amazon S3 Glacier an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Director - DevOps and Infrastructure at INTIGRAL
Excellent storage capabilities, great cost savings, and very efficient
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for cold storage.
What is most valuable?
The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3.
You store data in S3 and you create a policy that if this data is not accessed very frequently or if the data is not used, it will move that data from high storage to low storage. Cost-wise, it means great savings. If I'm paying $10 in internal storage, it will move to Glacier where I only pay less than a cent. You can push the data which you need, say once every two months or once every three months. That's the kind of data you can push into Glacier, not the data which you use every day or twice in a week.
What needs improvement?
I can't think of any improvements. It's a self-sustainable platform. We don't have anything which we need to add on. We are quite happy with the service.
Writing and storing data is very efficient. However, when you want to retrieve the data, it is a little bit time consuming because it specifies to retrieve the data it is going to take time, so you must make sure you log store the data which you will be accessing or which you will need very frequently.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Glacier for seven to eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
You don't have issues while accessing the data; we haven't seen any outages or downtime.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's scalable. It is huge. Managing the integration is quite easy and it's managed in a very simple way. It's not like you have to have some complex understanding of our platform so it's quite easy to manage.
What other advice do I have?
We are using the cloud deployment model. Everything is always on the cloud.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It's a really good solution that could use a few small improvements, but for us, it works very well.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Amazon S3 Glacier Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Public Cloud Storage ServicesPopular Comparisons
Microsoft Azure File Storage
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)
Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3
Google Cloud Storage Nearline
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store)
Microsoft Azure Block Storage
Oracle Database Backup Service
Oracle Cloud Archive Storage
Rackspace Cloud Block Storage
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Amazon S3 Glacier Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?
- When evaluating Public Cloud Storage Services, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Microsoft Azure
- What are your top 3 Cloud Storage predictions for 2022?
- With the increasing risk of cyber attacks in the west, due to the war in Ukraine, how safe is your data in the cloud?
- Why is Public Cloud Storage Services important for companies?