Our source metadata used for analytics and data lake was kept on Amazon S3 Glacier. Amazon S3 Glacier is a very cheap storage, where we store infrequently used data. If we have a large amount of data that many people are not accessing, we keep it in Amazon S3 Glacier to save the cost.
Founder & CTO at QuriousBit
A highly stable and cheap storage solution that can be used by users to store infrequently used data
Pros and Cons
- "Amazon S3 Glacier is a very cheap storage, where we store infrequently used data."
- "Although Amazon S3 Glacier is cheap, its data retrieval cost is very high compared to other solutions."
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
Users have to pay much less for storing data in Amazon S3 Glacier. However, it is costly to access the data from the solution. If somebody requires a large amount of data kept in Amazon S3 Glacier, that will cost a lot.
Amazon S3 Glacier becomes very costly when used on a big scale. Although Amazon S3 Glacier is cheap, its data retrieval cost is very high compared to other solutions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for four and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate Amazon S3 Glacier ten out of ten for stability.
Buyer's Guide
Amazon S3 Glacier
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Amazon S3 Glacier. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly scalable solution. More than 100 users were using the solution, and we plan to increase the usage.
I rate Amazon S3 Glacier ten out of ten for scalability.
How was the initial setup?
The solution's initial setup is very easy. I rate Amazon S3 Glacier ten out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.
What about the implementation team?
Someone with a little knowledge of the solution can deploy it in a day. One person is enough to deploy the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data. We used to spend around $ 200 a day on the solution.
What other advice do I have?
Amazon S3 Glacier is a cloud-based solution. Amazon S3 Glacier is the best alternative for users who have to access a large amount of data.
Overall, I rate Amazon S3 Glacier a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
An affordable and easy-to-setup product that works as expected
Pros and Cons
- "We save money with the product."
- "A couple of times, we faced outage issues that caused us problems."
What is our primary use case?
We use the product heavily. All our data is stored in it. We are using Delta Lake, which is built on the product. We have started using the solution for an app project. Some files and storage should not be in the hot area. It should go into Glacier. We are looking into some recycling policies.
What is most valuable?
We save money with the product. If some file is not frequently accessed, Glacier helps put things there. It is a fantastic product that works as expected.
What needs improvement?
We had some issues with the product’s stability. A couple of times, we faced outage issues that caused us problems. It happened one or two times.
For how long have I used the solution?
I am using the solution right now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The outage issue caused us a little bit of a headache, but it recovered soon, so that's fine.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have a minimum use for the product, but I have confidence about the scalability of Amazon products. Our organization's infrastructure, DevOps, and database teams use the product.
How are customer service and support?
I have not sought support. I have heard the team talking about support. We are on the enterprise level, so support is good. Up until now, we have been happy.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
The engineers, developers, and infrastructure team ensure the platform is good. We are a big company.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is cost-effective.
What other advice do I have?
I like Amazon very much. We are a billion-dollar company, and we use Amazon heavily. We will use the cycle policies to ensure all the files that are not accessed frequently are put somewhere. We are planning a big change in our organization to reboot our data.
We will have more data segmentation by using different buckets. When this transition is finished, we will work more toward the different layers of storage. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Amazon S3 Glacier
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Amazon S3 Glacier. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Chief Business Officer at Couture.ai
Easy to scale, offers free credits, and good overall stability
Pros and Cons
- "We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign."
- "Billing issues can be a nightmare. It's tough reaching the right person to get them sorted out."
What is our primary use case?
We're a tech company, so we use a variety of solutions, but S3 Glacier is what we currently use for the database.
We use it both internally for our own projects and our clients. We host some projects on Azure and AWS, depending on client requirements.
It's mostly used by enterprises for hosting various solutions.
What is most valuable?
We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign.
With hyperscalers like Amazon, things are generally pretty smooth. As long as the product is stable, billing is clear, and we don't have issues, we're happy.
What needs improvement?
Billing issues can be a nightmare. It's tough reaching the right person to get them sorted out.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this product for about three years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is easy to scale. That's a major reason we use both Azure and AWS. They're very scalable.
We have around 35 end users using this in our company.
How are customer service and support?
When we have to reach out to them, it becomes an issue. They can improve, but we don't need them frequently anyway.
We don't get the right people right away. They connect us to someone who doesn't know, and then it goes in a loop, and we have to be very patient to find the person who can actually solve our problem.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We use Microsoft Azure services. But the usage depends on the client or the purpose.
Some enterprises are typically on Azure, while others prefer AWS. We're cloud-native, so we don't differentiate between the two, but it depends on the client's needs.
What about the implementation team?
My tech team handled it. It was a matter of hours, not days.
One person should be enough.
What was our ROI?
We have seen an ROI. That's why we're using it. We see value in the return; otherwise, we wouldn't continue.
Mainly on the cost side, It's very easy to use, which leads to cost synergies. That's how we look at it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
If it were cheaper, I'd be happier. I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
It is a yearly basis license. There are some other services that are linked with it as well.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Head of IT at Broadway Gaming Ltd.
Highly recommended solution with dynamic storage management
Pros and Cons
- "The solution’s storage management is good and dynamic. The product is highly stable. The solution is highly scalable. The customer service and support is good. The initial setup is straightforward. I recommend the solution."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for storing file objects.
What is most valuable?
The solution’s storage management is good and dynamic.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for the past year. I’m currently using the latest version.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is highly stable. I rate it a perfect ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is highly scalable. Not individual users, but a specific application is using it within our company. I rate its scalability a perfect ten.
How are customer service and support?
The customer service and support is good.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. With a couple of clicks, you can set up the solution. First, create the S3 bucket and then get the URI. Our DevOps team mostly deals with this area.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We don't pay for licenses. We pay based on consumption data, considering how much data is stored.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend the solution. It's an effective native solution. It should be the first choice for storing files in AWS. Overall, I rate the solution a perfect ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Director at Conacent Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
Ideal for archiving large files and documents
Pros and Cons
- "I find Amazon S3 Glacier valuable for storing various documents like purchase orders, standard documents, and drawings."
- "I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection."
What is our primary use case?
I use Amazon S3 Glacier to store large files and documents for long-term archival purposes.
What is most valuable?
I find Amazon S3 Glacier valuable for storing various documents like purchase orders, standard documents, and drawings. It complements my setup where the files are stored in S3, and the main application is hosted on EC2 containers.
What needs improvement?
In terms of improvement, I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection. The advantage of being on the cloud allows for scalability, so increasing storage as needed would be beneficial.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of the solution as a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability of the solution as a perfect ten out of ten. We have approximately 50 users of the solution at our company.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward and it takes less than an hour to deploy it. Deploying Amazon S3 Glacier is straightforward since it is pre-integrated within the cloud platform. There is no need for additional integration efforts, and it is user-friendly, and suitable for average maintenance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is more expensive compared to on-premises solutions. Amazon S3 Glacier might seem pricier over three years than on-premise servers, but it has perks like lower upfront costs and no need for internal remote engineers. If treated as an operational expense, the advantages often outweigh the long-term cost.
What other advice do I have?
For those looking to start using Amazon AWS, my advice is to consider AWS Lightsail for a quick and easy deployment. Setting up an account is straightforward, and it is a hassle-free solution. Overall, I would rate Amazon S3 Glacier as a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Executive Head of Technology at Imbali Customised Solutions (Pty) Ltd.
Provides high stability and is used for file storage and hosting static websites
Pros and Cons
- "Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution."
- "The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved."
What is our primary use case?
We mainly used the solution for file storage and hosting static websites.
What is most valuable?
Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution.
What needs improvement?
The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for three to four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Amazon S3 Glacier is a very stable solution.
I rate the solution ten out of ten for stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have plans to increase the number of users for Amazon S3 Glacier.
I rate the solution ten out of ten for scalability.
How was the initial setup?
The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
The solution’s deployment takes around 15 to 20 minutes and can be done in-house. Two to three people are required for the solution's deployment and maintenance, including a developer and a cloud fundamental expert. They need to have a proper understanding of each different environment where the solution needs to be deployed.
What was our ROI?
We have seen around 300% return on investment with the Amazon S3 Glacier. With Amazon S3 Glacier, you save on infrastructure costs, security compliance costs, and the cost of employing technical staff.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Amazon S3 Glacier is not an expensive solution, and it has a pay-as-you-go pricing model.
What other advice do I have?
The solution helped us to meet our compliance needs. We use Amazon S3 Glacier as a platform as a Service (PaaS). If you have a virtual server, you can create a copy of the solution on an entire virtual machine. In case it goes down or someone messes with the configurations, you could just easily activate the copy.
Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive as far as virtual machines and data storage are concerned. That's why I minimized the data storage as much as possible. Two to three people are required for the solution's deployment and maintenance. They need to have a proper understanding of each different environment where the solution needs to be deployed.
Amazon S3 Glacier works like OneDrive, and it's straightforward to upload or download from it. I would recommend the solution to other users. Hosting static websites is straightforward, but you need a specialist to guide you to deploy dynamic websites on Amazon S3 Glacier.
The solution is easy to manage, and I rate it an eight out of ten for its ease of management.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Mar 4, 2024
Flag as inappropriateIT head at Ficobank
A highly stable solution that can be used for storage and RDBMS applications
Pros and Cons
- "Amazon S3 Glacier is a stable and scalable solution."
- "The solution's pricing is too expensive and could be improved."
What is our primary use case?
Amazon S3 Glacier can be used for storage and RDBMS applications.
What is most valuable?
Amazon S3 Glacier is a stable and scalable solution.
What needs improvement?
The solution's pricing is too expensive and could be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate Amazon S3 Glacier ten out of ten for stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Amazon S3 Glacier is a very scalable solution. More than 200 users are using Amazon S3 Glacier, and we have plans to increase the usage with the addition of new branches.
I rate Amazon S3 Glacier ten out of ten for scalability.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay a monthly licensing fee for Amazon S3 Glacier. There will be additional costs if you install other apps and features.
What other advice do I have?
I am using the latest version of Amazon S3 Glacier. Amazon S3 Glacier is a cloud-based solution. Around eight people are needed for the solution’s deployment and maintenance.
I would recommend Amazon S3 Glacier to other users. Before using the solution, users should know its cost because it is too expensive based on the storage size.
Since Amazon S3 Glacier is a cloud-based solution, you don't have to worry about installing and maintaining a server on-premises.
Overall, I rate Amazon S3 Glacier ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Manager, Security Operations Centre at Phillips Consulting Limited
Provides good on-premises data storage and high availability
Pros and Cons
- "Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly scalable and available solution."
- "The solution's cloud storage is very expensive, and users may not be able to afford cloud storage."
What is our primary use case?
I used the solution for firewall configuration and to configure rules and permissions.
What is most valuable?
Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly scalable and available solution. The most valuable feature of Amazon S3 Glacier is the on-premises data storage.
What needs improvement?
The solution's cloud storage is very expensive, and users may not be able to afford cloud storage.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Amazon S3 Glacier for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the solution nine and a half out of ten for stability.
How was the initial setup?
The solution’s initial setup is very straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
It takes less than five minutes to spin off a server. When it comes to deployment, the solution's deployment is faster over the cloud.
What other advice do I have?
Amazon S3 Glacier is a cloud-based solution. Around five engineers are needed for the solution's deployment and maintenance. It is easy to integrate Amazon S3 Glacier with other solutions. I would recommend the solution to other users.
Overall, I rate Amazon S3 Glacier nine and a half out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Mar 7, 2024
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
Download our free Amazon S3 Glacier Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Public Cloud Storage ServicesPopular Comparisons
Microsoft Azure File Storage
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)
Google Cloud Storage
Amazon S3
Google Cloud Storage Nearline
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store)
Microsoft Azure Block Storage
Oracle Database Backup Service
Oracle Cloud Archive Storage
Rackspace Cloud Block Storage
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Amazon S3 Glacier Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?
- When evaluating Public Cloud Storage Services, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Microsoft Azure
- What are your top 3 Cloud Storage predictions for 2022?
- With the increasing risk of cyber attacks in the west, due to the war in Ukraine, how safe is your data in the cloud?
- Why is Public Cloud Storage Services important for companies?