Apigee Reviews

We are utilizing Apigee as a means to host and manage our internal APIs. This involves creating an Apigee proxy that acts as a reverse proxy and hosting it on our gateway. When external customers want to use and monetize our internal APIs, we use Apigee to host them. Additionally, for internal applications that require interaction with our existing APIs, we also host them on Apigee.

The most valuable feature of the current version of Apigee, such as Apigee Edge, is that the maintenance and scalability of the service are not our responsibility. As a SaaS platform, Google takes care of it, ensuring the system is stable. Another valuable feature is the ability to customize the platform extensively. We can add JavaScript functionality to cater to any use case that is not available out of the box.

Compared to its competitors, such as Axway AMPLIFY API Management and Layer7 API Management, Apigee could benefit from having more policies to cater to various use cases. This would reduce the need for writing custom JavaScripts. If more features come straight out of the box, we can leverage them instead of writing custom code to achieve the same functionality.

I have been using Apigee for approximately two years.

The solution is stable.

Apigee is scalable. It can handle a decent amount of traffic.

We have 15 architects and developers using this solution in my organization.

The technical support team is not good. The support is not proactive. Google is a heavyweight in the industry, its support may not be as good as that of other industry partners. It is possible that Google's market dominance may have made them complacent in terms of support.

I rate the support Apigee a seven out of ten.

Neutral

The initial setup of the solution is easy. The setup is being handled by Google, you only need to request a new setup and procure a license for the solution.  Google takes care of everything else.

The current version of Apigee is not too expensive, but we are currently in talks with Google to understand their roadmap for Apigee X. However, we anticipate that with the introduction of Apigee X, the pricing will likely increase.

When comparing this solution to others, such as Axway AMPLIFY API Management Layer7 API Management, Apigee is a more stable and mature solution. Being a SaaS platform, you do not need to worry about deployment, scalability, server performance, and other related issues. However, with the upcoming release of Apigee X, there may be some constraints applied to the current version. If you choose to continue using Apigee it is a good choice.

I rate Apigee a nine out of ten.

We use this solution when we have microservices developed in either .NET Core or microservices developed on Java Spring Boot to develop and manage those APIs. We use it fof external and internal customers.

Before using Apigee, we used to have file transfer integrations. With Apigee in place, we are directly integrating or exposing our APIs to our partners who can access our services directly in real time.

The most important feature is the security capabilities and the way it integrates very quickly with other security providers. We have integrated it with Azure and it integrates quite seamlessly. Other valuable features include the API management and monitoring.

I am still struggling to understand how we can use Apigee as a hybrid system. The pricing of this solution could also be improved as there are multiple new products coming onto the market at competitive price points. Many of our customers are trying to move away from Apigee. They are considering open source platforms like Akana, Kong, Boomi and Mulesoft. 

I have been using this solution for two years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

I would rate the technical support for Apigee a four and a half out of ten. 

Positive

The initial setup involves medium complexity. We have 30 people who are involved in the setup of this solution for other clients and work in different locations.

I have a team of people who complete these deployments and implementation for our customers. Maintenance of this solution is easy and does not require more than one person. 

We have experienced ROI using this solution. 

If you want to monetize and externalize your API, I would recommend Apigee as a solution.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

We decided that the Apigee would be our API management corporative, and we just use it in a cloud operation. For all the communications that we are using for the public as well as some services for third parties, we use Apigee. We also are starting to use Apigee for our services inside our cluster. There is a proxy that we use that synchronizes with Apigee and the metrics that we need to follow the use of the API management.

We use it for exposed proxies. We want Apigee to be the only reference point for our client or for the only company that communicates with us. We try not to have business logic inside Apigee since we use it like a proxy. Sometimes we use some clients or some features that have to be here, for example, captcha-ing, or something like that. However, we try to use as few of the features as possible since we want to be agnostic.

The solution offers the best API management in the world. They have a lot of features. Their capchaing is very good.

The security that you have with Apigee is very good and aligns with compliance. It’s easy to manage in the development kit or tool you have to create, and that process is very easy to create, and the metrics you can get from the traffic of Apigee are excellent as well.

The solution offers an advantage over other kinds of API management. I don't want to select one, however, as no one is not going to be your silver bullet for solving a problem. However, in terms of my favorite aspect, the capchaing is excellent due to the time of response with Apigee. It’s about one millisecond, and that time is very remarkable for a client.

It’s easy to set up.

They have all the features needed to create good API management.

It’s a stable product.

The solution can scale.

One feature they have to invest time into is the developer portal they use. They do not have a good development portal. It's not easy to use, and you can not take advantage of the developer portal. You have to start creating your own developer portal and use the old API management to publish your API market.

Technical support could be better and more local.

I’ve used the solution for three or four years.

I’ve worked with the solution for about three years, and I have not had any problems with stability. It’s reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn’t crash or freeze. It’s been great.

It's a scalable product. I don't have a problem with scaling since I contract with the service, and I don't have to worry about how they scale.

There are five of us that working on the solution currently. They are primarily architects that help with the development.

Support could be easier to deal with.

We don't use it very often. I’m not sure about the team here in Chile. They may not have the skills necessary to be highly effective. However, we use a partner that is experienced with Apigee, and they have about ten years of experience. If we dealt with Apigee, the closest person to contact is in Mexico, and it’s very difficult to get the time booked with them.

The solution is one of the most accessible API management solutions I have worked with. I work with others, and this is the easy one. The setup, therefore, is pretty straightforward and simple.

We have persons that are specialists in Apigee and are confirmed to manage the Apigee and develop it over there.

I’ve not noted any ROI while using this product.

The API management can grow well. We went to Google a few weeks ago, and they have evolved. You can contract with this service in the marketplace. When using the marketplace, you can run Apigee in your organization, which can be local and fast. You can have an amble proxy in the Kubernetes or the function to use in the local environment. Overall, they have a strong roadmap as it’s continuously easier to use and offers a good cost-benefit. Now with the management that we have, we have a SaaS, and when you have a big team, like our company, that has a development fabric, they need more accounts to see the metrics and the console of Apigee. The SaaS approach makes it all easier to manage.

I’d advise new users to get to know the tool. If you don’t, you won’t get all of the performance out of t that you could. You won’t be able to take advantage of all the features, and you can lose the governance of the Apigee proxies. It’s important in the first month and year to clear governance for the product and to learn how to use it effectively.

Overall, I would rate the solution ten out of ten.

We have been using the solution for multiple customers. We performed a greenfield implementation for one of our customers in Canada. It is a complete enterprise platform. The version is Apigee X. We have also created an in-built developer portal. It is mostly used for external APIs, exposing APIs to partners and vendors.

One of our banking customers also uses Apigee. They use it more like a gateway and not like a full-fledged marketplace. We are also doing a lot of support work for one of our European customers. They have internal and external API exports on Apigee. We support the whole platform. We have done a lot of automation, built a lot of processes, and brought in governance.

The development is quite standard. The deployment can be completely automated because the solution exposes APIs. We have built a completely automated deployment cycle. It triggers validation, verification, deployment, testing, and promotion to the higher environment. It is completely done through Ansible Playbooks. Apigee also provides a few playbooks.

The solution is quite strong in security. It provides integrations, OAuth mechanisms, and token-based integrations. We have integrated some identity providers. We can customize the dashboard. The tool provides a lot of custom monitoring dashboards. We can track the API usage analytics. Apigee gives us a lot of parameters to track.

We can decide what to turn on or off and build the dashboards accordingly. We have built an analytics dashboard. We have built dashboards to see the usage trends, performance of the APIs, and degradation seen by API consumers. Monetization is a strong feature. We haven’t used it, though. The developer portal feature is very rich. We have also built a portal on Apigee using ReactJs. The developer portal is good.

Some customers are moving away from Apigee to other tools like Kong. The product’s licensing model is very expensive. Apigee is completely SaaS-hosted. We do not have control over the installation. API management solutions like Kong have a very good separation of concerns between the control and data planes. Apigee does not have such features.

I have been using the solution for more than six years.

I rate the tool’s stability an eight or nine out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability an eight or nine out of ten.

I rate the support a six or seven out of ten. We tried contacting support five years ago. We needed help with policies and architecture. We did not get much support. It might be because the product was still growing in Canada.

Neutral

The deployment is quite easy.

I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. The tool is extremely expensive.

We are a service provider. Our customers use Apigee. We are also partners with Google. We are SI integrators. The tool is quite stable. It has rich features. Customers prefer it if they can afford it. It is one of the best products we have. Overall, I rate the product a seven or eight out of ten.

We have hundreds of backend services, APIs, that are running. We want to protect and do analysis with calling externally, internally, and all the statistics we want to track using Apigee. That is the reason we're using the API gateway.

We have seen product improvement. Initially, we didn't use much of the analytics part. Later on, we saw that as an improvement. The rate-limiting quotas are improved as well.

The analytics feature is quite good. We can look at all the statistics, how many requests coming in, how many requests going out, what type of failures are happening, what is the performance of the APIs on those features. The solution helps us to track whenever there is an issue that comes in.

The only concern overall, with the organization, is cost-wise. I believe there is already a plan, within our organization, for moving to Azure API Management. The main reason is one of the features is a cloud-based, pay-per-use. And then, because a lot of our services are moving towards Azure, why have another network of API gateway.

The testing feature is one additional feature that I see is in APIM and it is not here. We can build our own demo web service and test your proxy. That feature has been provided in APIM, not in Apigee.

I've been using the solution almost three years now.

Overall, the solution is good.

The scalability is good. Our load has improved drastically in the last three years. The traffic has been increased, and we still see a good performance overall.

Mostly developers from different teams use it. And there are administrative teams maintaining the overall solution within the organization.

The technical support is good. As a user, we report to the admin team and they work with the consultants if they are not able to resolve the issue.

I was not involved in the initial setup, but I've been told that the onsite setup was a little complex and there were a few restrictions as well.

We see a return on investment. As of now, it's good. But overall, cost wise, it is a little higher, comparative. 

For Apigee, I think licensing is on a monthly basis. The cost increases as the usage increases. It's higher than many competitors.

Azure APIM is the one option we evaluated.

From two or three years back using it to now, it's quite fast. The performance side is good.

It's a user-friendly product, it is. You can customize all you want, and the policies and the features they have are quite easy to use. Anyone can use it, drag and drop, and it supports a lot of other languages like JavaScript, non-JS, and all. 

I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The bank embarked on a journey towards open banking solutions, particularly in the realm of online banking and medical services. This initiative prompted the need for a gateway solution, and after careful consideration, the bank chose Apigee as its API management platform. Since then, the collaboration with Apigee has proven beneficial, leading to ongoing improvements and learning experiences for the teams involved.

We find great value in the ability to segregate distinct projects within the system and extract security statistics. Its flexibility allows seamless management of different products, showcasing scalability to handle extensive solutions. Whether dealing with hundreds or thousands of nickel services, this configuration enables us to sustain ongoing work effectively, ensuring real and efficient management of diverse IT projects.

Our focus on improvement primarily revolves around security, differing somewhat from the Connect endpoint. We've encountered challenges in leveraging Connect functionality, prompting us to explore additional tools, such as Fergus, to address implementation and security issues.

I have been working with it for four years.

The stability issue occurred once in a real-life scenario at the bank, causing a downtime of approximately one hour, leaving the entire bank without internet access. This incident was not typical of a bank, and other companies might view it as an isolated event. Occasionally, a service may slow down due to factors like migration, causing disruptions within the timeframe of a timeout.

The system is scalable; however, achieving scalability involves updating numerous properties and parameters. While it is manageable, the learning curve proved significant, and we gained insights through collaboration with a team of three during the development process.

The initial setup is relatively complex. While it may require learning, trial, and understanding, once you reach an advanced level, it becomes a more personalized experience.

The deployment process involves sharing JSON or Slack commands, and the subsequent steps are then taken over by the company from the Apigee, initiating the process from scratch or refreshing it.

Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.

Apigee is an API gateway used for API management.

The most valuable feature of Apigee is its simplicity of deploying an API and restricting access, like rate limit, with the API.

The technical support could be improved because their response time is slow.

I have been using Apigee for two and a half years.

I rate Apigee an eight out of ten for stability.

Apigee is a pretty scalable solution. Approximately ten developers use Apigee in our organization. The traffic that we have is close to 10,000 API requests a day.

I rate Apigee a nine or ten out of ten for scalability.

The solution's deployment is quick and does not take more than an hour. However, when you face challenges, the support is not very great.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate Apigee an eight or nine out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

Apigee is a pretty expensive solution.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten.

Apigee is deployed on the cloud in our organization. I would recommend the solution to other users. Our clients for Apigee are mostly medium and enterprise businesses.

Overall, I rate Apigee a nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for all of our security. There are a few use cases for us where we use it to protect API to third parties.

The solution, overall, is quite good.

The product has a few restrictions I'd prefer weren't there.

We have trouble finding use cases. For example, when we google "data locator" we can't find a use case scenario at all. We can't find more than, approximately, five use cases, however, we need more.

We needed to do more than 20 configurations, and we weren't able to do that as the limit is 20 on the solution.

The solution tends to hide the limitations to keep selling the product. I can't blame them for doing it, however, it makes it difficult for those of us who eventually sign on.

The solution is expensive.

I've been dealing with the solution for close to three years at this point.

The stability of the solution is good. There aren't issues surrounding bugs or glitches. We don't find that it crashes or freezes. It's pretty reliable.

The scalability of the solution is okay. If a company needs to scale it, it should be able to do so.

Currently, we only have about ten people on our team that use it.

We haven't found the technical support to be that good, to be honest. We're not completely satisfied with the level of service.

We're currently using IBM Connect as well as Azure. Functionality-wise, there aren't too many differences. One is on-premises, however, therefore it's really difficult to compare both together. With IBM, you have to maintain a few more things. There are more administrative tasks.

The initial setup wasn't straightforward. It was complex due to the fact that Apigee didn't have any integrations and we had IBM APA Connect Resources.

There were many things we weren't told earlier. Once you clear certain items you can't change the name, for example. There were a few other items, like monitoring, which had a limited number of configurations which was an issue.

Deployment was fairly quick. It only took five minutes or so.

The solution is not a cheap product. Licensing can be quite expensive.

Our contract is around $2 million for three years.

We don't have a clear picture how the billing works. We have one service package of one size and yet we don't have a clear picture of the purchase or the status or if they will charge more due to earlier limits on services. The solution needs to make licensing more clear. Even if they charged us $10,000 or even $20,000 more but they were clear about the what and the why, we'd be okay with that. We'd just like to know.

We're just a customer. We don't have a business relationship with the company.

We are removing our IBM products and transition completely over to Apigee.

We have Azure's API as well. In next one year or two year, we are going to dissolve IBM API Connect as well as Azure CIM and move everything to Apigee.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I'd rate Apigee at an eight. We'd rate it higher, however, they aren't clear on their offering. We just want everything automated and easy. The cost is not the issue. The lack of information is.

I'd recommend the solution. It's a nice product and companies should go ahead with it, so long as they are okay with the pricing, as it is rather expensive. If a company is cost-consious, IBM API Connect may be better as the licensing costs are lower.