Aruba ClearPass Reviews

Our primary use case for Aruba ClearPass is to use it in IoT services.

Aruba has improved my organization because it supported me on my level of access. I hope to see Aruba add routers to their portfolio. 

A very important feature for me is its support of a multi-tenant solution on deliverables. For instance, I have three customers, or three users, and I want each customer to have his own portal and his own database to manage their subscriber for reporting and for provision. 

Aruba needs to improve and the processes must be clear. I also believe the marketing is very important, as well as to split the database to be more specific, like having a user name, access point name or site name. 

In general, Aruba is very stable and it supports me every time I have issues related to my database. 

The scalability is good. We currently have about 100 users but we expect this to grow to 10,000 by the end of the year. So we plan to increase our usage. We won't need to employ extra staff because the support from Aruba is very good.

The technical support from Aruba is very good.

Before we started using Aruba we worked on Cisco, which has the same setup. They had the same access layer, access points, access controller and management at Cisco. We were, however, looking for a wireless solution.

The deployment took about two years, and then it took about two weeks for the configurations to be activated. 

We've invested in Aruba to increase our customers to 10,000 by the end of the year so we hope to see a good return on investment. 

We pay an annual licensing fee for Aruba and there are no additional costs.

I can recommend this solution for anyone in terms of guest management or from a security perspective. I will rate this a nine out of ten.

We are a system integrator, and we are a prized reseller and a partner of Aruba and Fortinet. Usually, our clients send a request for network access control type of issues. So, we are fulfilling these types of requirements with the help of Aruba ClearPass and Fortinet FortiNAC.

We are mainly using Aruba ClearPass for our clients for securing access to their on-premise assets. As per customer expectations, we are trying our best to track the complete user activity in the network. This is the main and the core feature we require.

The user interface of Aruba ClearPass should be user-friendly like Fortinet FortiNAC.

In the next version, I would like to see some enhancement or extension on the tracking side. For example, when any user enters the network, it should be more visible in the graphical form.

I have been using this solution for almost two years.

It is a very stable solution.

It is a completely scalable solution.

Aruba's technical support is much better than other vendors.

It is not easy, but it is also not complex. Anyone with some amount of implementation expertise can easily implement it.

The number of people required depends on the requirement. If the requirement is not big and the customer is an SMB, then one or two implementation engineers are enough for implementation. If the customer is an enterprise customer with a big network, you might need more than two or three implementation engineers.

The deployment duration depends on a client's assets. For a client with 400 or 500 assets, two to three weeks would be required. If the network is very big, it can take one month.

To all those who plan on using Aruba ClearPass, I would advise having clear expectations in terms of solution capability and functionality. They should include all the features that are available by default in Aruba ClearPass. These are very interesting features.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.

We use this solution for controlling the security of our wireless network.

Aruba ClearPass has improved the security control in our network environment.

The most valuable feature for our network environment is the identification of discovered devices. 

Configuration should be more easy to understand between the link of two topics.

OnBoard, OnGuard, SSO and IntroSpect UEBA, including Palo Alto integration. These are valuable from engineer to C-level executives, who want visibility, performance, statistics, and a platform which can take action for them without manual intervention, saving time and money.

Gives us network access control, visibility, scalability, security, and control in what is becoming an uncontrollable, inundated BYOD and IoT world.

Aruba is always finding better, innovative ways to make their products easier and more friendly. It is always being improved, but what I would like to see is “AAS”. Not only Aruba APs with central, but NAC/ClearPass, AirWave, and everything licensed as a Service. This way, like AWS, they can spin up what they need when they need it and vice versa.

None.

None.

Awesome tech support when needed. Each customer is given a customer number and TAC will follow through until all issues are resolved, whether it be a flaw in the product or a customer misconfiguration.

I did not personally use a previous solution.

Initial setup is straightforward. It is recommended to read the manual before implementation.

I provide straight answers. Licensing and pricing are extremely straightforward.

Run a 90 day free Proof of Concept (PoC) for each product by implementing and using it fully in your environment. This way you will be educated on its features, functionality, and manageability.

No.

Our primary use case for Aruba ClearPass is network access control at various levels, from the base to the highest level. Most of our customers deploy it on-premises.

Because of the stability of Aruba ClearPass, most of our customers are okay with the price. It is very stable and provides a good balance between cost and functionality, leading to cost savings and efficiency gains.

The most valuable feature of Aruba ClearPass is its ease of use.

In my opinion, the price of Aruba ClearPass could be better. Additionally, since other vendors sometimes offer more competitive pricing, it may influence customers' decisions.

I have been working with Aruba ClearPass for about ten years.

I rate the stability of Aruba ClearPass as nine out of ten. It is very stable.

I would rate the scalability of Aruba ClearPass as nine out of ten.

I rate the technical support from Aruba as nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup of Aruba ClearPass is very easy.

Because of the stability, the main concern for customers is the price, but the solution works really fine. This implies a return on investment based on performance.

I think that the pricing is relatively high, and I rate it a seven on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

Based on my experience, I recommend Aruba ClearPass to others because it is user-friendly and effective.

I would rate it an eight out of ten.

ClearPass provides authentication solutions for endpoints. 

ClearPass is effortless to use and configure. It's not hard to learn the tool, and it has lots of features.

ClearPass' interface could be more user-friendly. 

I've used ClearPass for more than four years.

ClearPass is stable. In my opinion, it's the best solution of its kind.

ClearPass is highly scalable.

ClearPass support is fine because we have a good relationship with the vendor, so we can call them whenever we have questions. 

Deploying ClearPass is very straightforward. We are an Aruba integrator, and we've installed ClearPass for more than 10 clients. You can deploy it with two or three engineers, and the time needed for deployment depends on the client. Installing ClearPass for a larger client will take about one week, but a smaller client takes only about three days. 

We pay a yearly subscription.

I rate Aruba ClearPass eight out of 10. 

We used ClearPass for wireless 802.1x Authentication in a large campus deployment (more than 10,000 access points). 

We are also going to use it for our guest WiFi access solution. I would like to promote its use for wired network authentication as well.

• It eliminated the management of 10 different individual discrete RADIUS servers. 
• We are able to satisfy many different organizational needs because of its flexibility.

The ClearPass clustering model saved us staff time and reduced errors by eliminating the need to manage individual RADIUS servers. The mulit-vendor capability is also valuable.

The product's graphical user interface (GUI) could use an update and better integration between the guest management and policy management interfaces.

I'd also like to make sure there is support for Juniper switches.

It has been pretty stable, except sometimes when we go to upgrade to a different version - it hasn't been user-impacting - but we've had some issues.

We were using a different vendor's wireless infrastructure, and we switched to the Aruba platform - and ClearPass, that was part the package.

The most important criterion when selecting the vendor in this particular case was integration with a wireless infrastructure product because it was the same vendor.

There were two in total, Cisco and Aruba. We chose Aruba because their technical support was more responsive and knowledgeable than we had with Cisco.

Do a proof of concept. Actually get your hands on the product and don't just look at the brochure, the glossy about the product.

I rate it a nine out of 10 because it's done everything that we've been able to ask it to do.

Aruba ClearPass could be deployed on-premise in the cloud.

Aruba ClearPass is a simple solution for customers to see what is happening on their network.

I have been using Aruba ClearPass for approximately five years.

Aruba ClearPass is used for our clients to control and access their network.

Aruba ClearPass is stable.

I have found Aruba ClearPass to be scalable.

We have approximately three to four clients that are using this solution.

The support has been good for our customers.

Aruba ClearPass is complicated to install. Before our clients can use the solution they typically do a POC and we loan them some equipment for them to test with.

The projects from negotiation to acceptance take approximately three to six months.

The implementation can improve because it is challenging to explain some of the concepts to the client.

We do the implementation of the solution, and the time it takes for us to do the deployment depends on the customer's size.

The starting price of Aruba ClearPass is 200k Hong Kong dollars. The licensing is based on the endpoints. For example, 100 - 500 endpoints. 

There is a subscription for the support from the vendor that can be bundled together.

The solution can be expensive because you might have to train the customer.

I rate Aruba ClearPass a seven out of ten.