Aruba ClearPass Reviews

The advanced RADIUS functionality is the most valuable feature for us.

It is possible to connect corporate people and external people to the WiFi with certificates by doing CA and on-boarding for external people and traditional Radius for the corporate people.

I'd like to see improvement with RADIUS and guest on-boarding. It also needs to be more intuitive to use with simplified administration.

I've used it for two to three years.

There were issues with High Availability and very important changes and issues with version upgrades.

There were no issues with the stability.

There were no issues with the scalability.

2/10 - it was very difficult to find the correct assistance. If we could find the right one, we would be happy.

We previously used Cisco NAC Guest Server and AMI GoPod. ClearPass is the evolution of AMI GoPod.

It was too complex. There is too much functionality in one device such as RADIUS, Guest, Provisioning, On-boarding, and NAC.

The implementation was done in-house. It is the corporative authentication solution and the Guest Portal for the customer.

It is a very complete solution with some important functionalities, but it can be difficult to implement and the support is not the best.

I use ClearPass for network access control, profiling, and security.

ClearPass's best feature is its comprehensiveness.

It would be useful if a free trial was available for customers to see if ClearPass is suitable for them before purchasing.

I've been using ClearPass for two years.

ClearPass is stable.

ClearPass is scalable.

ClearPass's technical support is okay.

ClearPass isn't hard to set up, but it takes a long time.

I'd advise anybody thinking of implementing ClearPass to go for it, it's a good solution. I would rate ClearPass as eight out of ten.

I am using Aruba ClearPass for 802.1X and backup indication.

Aruba ClearPass improved security across a diverse network, which is countrywide. It provides extra security so that anybody that gets on the network, belongs there, we know those that have allowed access to the network, get access to the network.

The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are the authentication mechanisms and the integration with Active Directory(AD).

Aruba ClearPass could improve the user interface, it is a bit chunky.

I have been using Aruba ClearPass for approximately 18 months.

Aruba ClearPass is stable in my usage.

I have found Aruba ClearPass to be scalable.

We have hundreds of users in different locations using this solution.

I have not used the support from Aruba ClearPass.

I have not used a previous solution.

Aruba ClearPass was installed into the cloud and had the resiliency working. Then we had a test lab environment where we rolled out the configurations, to test it, and then we rolled out the overall configuration for all of the switches and access points around the network. The whole process was straightforward. The whole process took approximately three months from start to finish.

The implementation was done in-house. We used three people for the process.

I felt we did not get a return on investment.

The price of Aruba ClearPass is expensive. When you want to build redundant systems it can be seen as necessary, so the enterprise will manage all of those costs.

There are additional costs because we have implemented it into a cloud environment, there are costs associated with the cloud environment. We didn't go with appliances.

I did some research before choosing Aruba ClearPass. I looked at open NAC and some of the other proprietary systems.

There are additional features that we haven't used, such as fingerprinting and guest reception type scenarios. There are other features we haven't implemented and there's no reason to implement them at this stage.

Planning is the most important aspect of getting started before implementing Aruba ClearPass. Don't jump into it, you need to plan. You need to understand what you're trying to do and plan it and then start off in a small, safe environment for rollout. Once you've tested all the scenarios and it works completely for each one, then roll it out over a long period of time to ensure that the user experience is good.

I rate Aruba ClearPass a seven out of ten.

Our company provides professional services and we implement the features based on the customer requirement. All the features in ClearPass are good and work the way they need to.

Based on our implementations for many customers, it seems that they're most interested in the OnGuard feature that checks the compliance of corporate laptops and which restricts network access for users who are not compliant with security policies.

The reporting feature in ClearPass has found devices that are non-compliant had has addressed issues during the initial implementation phase.

Our customers also often request the guest feature, which they find very useful.

The OnGuard agent requires some enhancements.

We've used it for the last three years.

It works best when you plan deployment according to device behavior while integrated in the network.

It's been generally stable.

It scales well in our customer network environments.

Our TAC is very responsive and very helpful. They are able to provide solutions for all the new requirements by creating customized SQL queries and configs.

I worked initially with Cisco ISE, but I didn't really get to know it well. My company currently provides ClearPass solutions only.

We plan deployments considering all the configuring that needs to be done on the other integrated devices. The setup always ends up smooth and straightforward.

You should test all the requirements during the PoC itself so that the planning and deployment will be smooth.

The solution is used for integration with the third party. If you are not selective of the switches in Juniper or Huawei, then the third-party scan integration of ClearPass is distinct.

The customized modules for guests, the self-registration and login, one license for all, no license for guest users, and the self-integration of sandbox integration are the most valuable features. 

There is room for improvement in the support. 

I have been using the solution since 2015. I work with the latest version.  

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

The support is okay. 

Positive

I have not used any other solution before. I have general information about FortiNAC from Fortinet.

The initial setup is straightforward. It takes around fifteen minutes to be deployed. Just one engineer can deploy the solution.

In Spain, Cisco is more expensive than ClearPass but in Jordan, there are big deals on Cisco, and even at times, it is free of charge. ClearPass is an affordable solution.

I recommend ClearPass for its integration, stability, and scalability. It is easy to configure and has a user-friendly webpage.

I rate it an eight out of ten.

I mostly use ClearPass for network separation.

I would like to see better integration with the firewall for zeroing out blacklisted users.

I've been using Aruba solutions for almost 20 years.

When working with a virtual solution, it's always the same image when you do the initial installation, but you need to have a picture of the scale you want to achieve. 

For example, let's say you are switching from a medium-sized solution to a larger-scale solution. Suppose you overestimate and wind up with too many endpoints. In that case, you'll need to reinstall the solution because it reserves resources of your virtual infrastructure, depending on the type of installation that you do. 

Say, for instance, I want my next solution to service 5,000 endpoints, and in the end, you have 12,000. That means you needed the bigger version. The license is the same, but the installation reserves the resources of the virtual infrastructure.

We handle all our support in-house. Our engineers have the highest certifications.

Generally speaking, setting up a network access control solution is complex. You have to integrate the use cases.

I rate Aruba ClearPass eight out of 10. It's a great solution with multi-vendor support. That's always useful. My advice is to take advantage of Aruba's identification solution called ClearPass Insight in addition to the network access control.

• 802.1x quick, easy, and secure wireless access for our staff machines
• Customizable captive portal for quick and easy BYOD access for students
• Quick and easy ability to allow guests to use the wireless network

Bringing mobile devices on to the network has been simplified and secured at the same time.

Installation can be time-consuming, so Hire an Aruba consultant to do the install and save yourself a lot of time. There will be plenty of time for you to learn the product later. Plus, the consultant can pass on some valuable information during the process.

I've used it for two years.

There were no issues with the deployment.

There have been no issues with the stability.

There have been no issues with the scalability.

Aruba Support is fast and accurate. I never have problems getting someone on the line that can find a resolution the problem we are having.

The initial set-up was straightforward.

We had a vendor team on site which helped accelerate the process.

We are a solution provider and this is one of the products that we implement for our clients.

The most valuable feature is flexibility as it supports solutions from multiple vendors.

The interface could be made easier and more intuitive.

We have been using Aruba ClearPass for about four years.

This is a stable product.

The technical support is very good. When you have an issue they respond very, very quickly.

We have qualified and certified engineers who implement and deploy this solution.

The price is not an issue for us.

Overall, Aruba ClearPass is a very good product, we feel very confident using it, and it is a product that I would recommend. That said, it is not perfect.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.