Cisco Umbrella Reviews

The ability to use custom categories to block out websites was valuable because the predefined categories were either too restrictive or not restrictive enough. For example, one category would block everything from social media to webmail, while another category did not block either. So to be able to customize categories made it a lot easier.

This product has made it easier for our IT team to keep employees on track to work and away from distracting websites.

Perhaps an option to be able to block only specific users would be a way to improve the free version of OpenDNS. In our department, there are multiple users that need different levels of access. For example, those who work in the advertising department need access to social media, while those in the accounting department do not. The ability to be able to set different rules for each user would have been nice to have.

I have used it for about six months.

I did not encounter any stability issues.

I did not encounter any scalability issues.

I did not need to contact technical support when using OpenDNS. The product is very self-explanatory.

This was the first product we used for filtering websites.

The initial setup was very straightforward. I did not have any issues.

I was using the free version of OpenDNS, so I am not aware of the pricing.

We were choosing between pfSense and their packages versus. OpenDNS looked easier to setup, so we went for that first. Eventually, we moved to using pfSense’s SquidGuard, because it allows us to be more precise with filtering websites.

This product is very straightforward and simple to setup. I would recommend others to just give the product a try. I am sure they will be happy with the results. OpenDNS has different filtering levels, but I found it easier to just go for the custom level versus the ones they had set up already.

We like Cisco Umbrella because of DNS security. It's one step ahead of whatever we are using for regular web filtering. In that way, it's more secure than other web filtering products.

The price could be better. The price is definitely a bit high, but we have to pay a premium for Cisco products. 

I have been using Cisco Umbrella for more than a year.

It's a stable product.

Cisco Umbrella is scalable.

Technical support is helpful and provides quick and fast resolutions.

The initial setup is very easy. Even the integrations are very easy.

Cisco Umbrella is expensive and could be cheaper.

I will recommend this product to other users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Cisco Umbrella a ten.

We use Cisco Umbrella for monitoring and more.

I like that it integrates with the infrastructure. I also like the kind of data and intelligence that's built-in. It helps create innovative reports for security. 

It could be more secure. It would be better if they provided a transferring proxy as an add-on and more integration.

I have been dealing with Cisco Umbrella for two and a half years.

Cisco Umbrella is a stable solution.

Cisco Umbrella is very scalable at the cloud level. All you have to do is increase the internet bandwidth and pay for the license. 

Technical support is excellent.

The initial setup was pretty straightforward. It was simple. 

The price depends on the use case, and it's a bit linear. But it depends on the customer's strategy and how Cisco plans to optimize the costs. 

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Cisco Umbrella a ten.

Generally, we use Cisco Umbrella to prevent DNS attacks within the LAN. As we are a data center, that is our main use case.

Within our organization, there are roughly 500 people using this solution.

It's good for local communication with the data center and LAN.

I have been using Cisco Umbrella for one and a half years.

Stability-wise, it's good. I have never encountered any bugs. 

The technical support is very good.

Actually, we recently switched over to Zscaler because it has more features and it's more scalable than Cisco Umbrella.

I wasn't involved in the initial setup, so I can't comment on that.

I would recommend Cisco Umbrella to other interested companies. It's a very flexible and secure application — it's very good.

Overall, I would give Cisco Umbrella a rating of 10 out of 10.

It has the ability to block malware threats in the cloud and control web content access from inside or outside the office.

It has significantly reduced the threat of virus/malware infections, CryptoLocker infections and has made our client’s networks more secure.

Improvement could be made in the area of detailed reporting analytics broken down by client name for individual custom reporting.

I have been using it for about three years.

I have not encountered any deployment, stability or scalability issues. The installer can be scheduled and rolled out using our set of Managed Services tools.

Customer service and technical support is excellent. I give it a 9.5.

We have used Websense, Barracuda and iPrism in the past. The flexibility of OpenDNS supporting a high-performance cloud infrastructure and not requiring any hardware or software cost was a major factor. The monthly pricing model fits into our company’s core services as a Managed Services provider and eliminates the need for annual renewal licenses.

Initial setup was straightforward for the most part, but it can become complex depending on the granular content filtering features that need to be implemented for each client.

In-house implementation. I would recommend an automated procedure on a domain network instead of a manual remote install. I recommend a default of blocking malware, phishing and pornography only, and allowing the client to determine if any additional categories need to be blocked on their network.

ROI benefits both the reseller and the client in Managed Services because of its proactive approach to network security. Our technicians aren’t spending hours of wasted time removing malware and viruses from desktops and notebooks. Customers appreciate the productive benefit of multi-layered protection that builds upon their legacy firewall and spam prevention. The pricing for the subscription is minimal (literally a few cents a day). The price is based on content management and security of client networks, as a bundled solution with an existing service.

Try it before you buy it, to test it out. Test the content filtering categories.

Deployment and management are easy.

It made web filtering and malware protection easy.

I think there is some room for improvement with regard to the Windows client. While providing great protection for roaming laptops, on occasion users in the office would get the "yellow triangle" showing up over their wifi connection. It would state that the users were not connected to the internet, when in fact they were. This caused a few gripes and was difficult to troubleshoot. Other than that, not much else.

Only other suggestion might have been a URL to automate requests when checking if a blocked site is in fact a valid block.

I have been using it for two years.

Deployment and scaling are very easy. The only issue was as mentioned.

Technical support is excellent, with quick responses.

iPrism was inline, did not scale, and not easy to manage.

Initial setup was easy; just forward your DNS.

An in-house team implemented it; it was pretty straightforward. Just get the appropriate teams involved.

ROI was all about added security and a decrease in malware.

Pricing was fair.

Go for it; there is no better way to secure guest networks without any headaches.

I think Umbrella is good enough as of now. It has the security of domains. It analyzes the domain security and helps us implement the securest policy. This feature is presently not being provided with other technologies. It's a multi-tenant solution. Multi-tenancy MSSP packages, they're all ready. As well as any cost amounting deployment security coverages with DNS and intelligence policy of production and protocols.

I would like to see integration with SecurNX in the future.

We have contacted Cisco technical support a number of times for Cisco They are two hundred percent. They are very efficient. Any kind of support you can stay with Cisco. We don't have any issues with technical support.

The initial setup is traightforward. There is no complexity in the setup. The setup took minutes only.

Setup and maintenance are done by our own team.

It is not a very expensive product.

Cisco Umbrella is a very good product as of now as there is no competition. It is an excellent product. It is, actually, a must for our organization. It is not a very expensive product. I would rate Cisco Umbrella at a ten on a scale of ten.

Web content filtering: Cisco ASA 5505 doesn’t have a straight content filtering feature, so we used OpenDNS and it worked like a charm. It is security beyond the firewall, and hence more beneficial, as it stops the threats before reaching the firewall and enhances security.

We were able to implement web content filtering to block unwanted traffic, and to prevent bandwidth choking and malicious attacks without deploying any hardware/software, within a few hours.

I would like the product to offer more security features, such as IPS, IDS, DDoS prevention, etc.

I have been using it for six months.

I have not yet encountered any deployment, stability or scalability issues.

Implementation was straightforward with minimal changes to existing infrastructure.

It was self-implemented.

We have tried a Linux-based proxy server, but that was complex to manage and wasn’t foolproof.

I highly recommend SMBs and enterprises use it to enhance their network security with minimal cost through the OpenDNS cloud solution.