Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Umbrella based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection, Palo Alto Networks DNS Security, and Akamai Edge DNS.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cisco Umbrella provides extensive web filtering and DNS-level protection, benefiting remote work settings. In comparison, Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection excels in advanced DNS security and management, offering detailed integration with IPAM systems for network management. Cisco Umbrella's flexible deployment outweighs Infoblox's focused on-premises option.
Cisco Umbrella offers features like security posture checks and content filtering, ideal for hybrid work environments with seamless management. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks DNS Security provides comprehensive threat protection with built-in firewall features suited for organizations needing enhanced DNS-based attack defense.
Cisco Umbrella appeals to budget-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and strong support. In comparison, Akamai Edge DNS attracts organizations seeking deep feature sets and robust functionality, where its high initial cost delivers long-term ROI in performance and scalability-focused environments.
Cisco Umbrella offers a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective option, while Akamai Edge DNS requires a higher initial investment, highlighting its comprehensive service features.
Cisco Umbrella offers a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective option, while Akamai Edge DNS requires a higher initial investment, highlighting its comprehensive service features.
Cisco Umbrella excels in scalability and user interface simplicity, ideal for businesses prioritizing ease of use and threat intelligence. In comparison, Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense targets advanced security needs, offering deep integration and comprehensive protection features for enterprises willing to invest in robust solutions.
Cisco Umbrella shows a lower setup cost compared to Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense, which tends to have a higher initial expenditure. This cost difference may influence decisions for budget-conscious organizations seeking efficient threat protection solutions.
Cisco Umbrella shows a lower setup cost compared to Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense, which tends to have a higher initial expenditure. This cost difference may influence decisions for budget-conscious organizations seeking efficient threat protection solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers broad security features like domain history tracking and strong DNS-based attack protection, making it ideal for large organizations. In comparison, TitanHQ WebTitan stands out for its simplicity and budget-friendly pricing, appealing to SMBs seeking customizable web filtering solutions.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher initial setup cost compared to TitanHQ WebTitan, making WebTitan a more budget-friendly option for users prioritizing lower initial expenditure.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher initial setup cost compared to TitanHQ WebTitan, making WebTitan a more budget-friendly option for users prioritizing lower initial expenditure.
Cisco Umbrella provides straightforward cloud-based DNS protection with ease of integration. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP DNS excels in traffic management for large environments. Cisco offers competitive pricing and fast ROI, while F5 presents value through a comprehensive feature set despite higher costs.
Cisco Umbrella offers straightforward integration with strong cloud-based security. In comparison, EfficientIP DNS Guardian requires intensive deployment yet excels with advanced DNS security and adaptive response. While Cisco is cost-effective short-term, EfficientIP provides robust features for long-term security investment.
Cisco Umbrella's setup costs are lower, offering affordability, while EfficientIP DNS Guardian's higher setup fees reflect its more comprehensive features, highlighting a clear cost-effectiveness distinction.
Cisco Umbrella's setup costs are lower, offering affordability, while EfficientIP DNS Guardian's higher setup fees reflect its more comprehensive features, highlighting a clear cost-effectiveness distinction.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust threat intelligence and cloud-based security ideal for scalable networks. In comparison, Heimdal Endpoint Security emphasizes proactive threat prevention and superior endpoint detection, appealing to those needing real-time protection and comprehensive technical support for deeper configuration.
Cisco Umbrella provides extensive integration and robust threat intelligence, making it suitable for larger enterprises. In comparison, DNSFilter offers AI-driven protection and competitive pricing, appealing to businesses valuing straightforward deployment and affordability without requiring extensive security features.
Cisco Umbrella offers cost-effectiveness with easy integration and strong DNS security. In comparison, Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise justifies higher costs with advanced threat protection and scalability. Cisco appeals with rapid deployment, while Akamai attracts those seeking extensive web security and scalability.
Cisco Umbrella provides robust domain protection with detailed visibility, appealing to organizations with Cisco infrastructure. In comparison, BlueCat Edge offers extensive DNS control through advanced routing capabilities, making it ideal for large-scale operations needing DNS query transparency and manipulation flexibility.
Cisco Umbrella offers extensive features and integration for robust security needs. In comparison, Webroot DNS Protection provides simpler deployment and competitive pricing. Organizations may prefer Cisco for comprehensive support, while Webroot appeals to those valuing cost-efficiency and ease of implementation.
Cisco Umbrella incurs setup costs, while Webroot DNS Protection minimizes these expenses, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for businesses seeking DNS solutions.
Cisco Umbrella incurs setup costs, while Webroot DNS Protection minimizes these expenses, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for businesses seeking DNS solutions.
Cisco Umbrella is appreciated for its threat intelligence, ease of integration, and customer support. In comparison, EfficientIP DNS Firewall stands out with advanced features like flexible DNS filtering and customization, making it appealing for buyers seeking robust network security and long-term value.
Cisco Umbrella has moderate setup costs, while EfficientIP DNS Firewall offers a more cost-effective introductory setup option. Cisco Umbrella may require higher initial investment compared to the budget-friendly setup of EfficientIP DNS Firewall.
Cisco Umbrella has moderate setup costs, while EfficientIP DNS Firewall offers a more cost-effective introductory setup option. Cisco Umbrella may require higher initial investment compared to the budget-friendly setup of EfficientIP DNS Firewall.
Cisco Umbrella excels in integration and global cloud security, offering extensive connectivity. In comparison, EfficientIP DNS Blast, with high-speed DNS processing and threat detection, appeals to those prioritizing DNS performance. Cisco's global support contrasts EfficientIP’s expertise in specialized DNS functions.
Cisco Umbrella incurs higher setup costs compared to EfficientIP DNS Blast, revealing budget differences that may affect choice. EfficientIP offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
Cisco Umbrella incurs higher setup costs compared to EfficientIP DNS Blast, revealing budget differences that may affect choice. EfficientIP offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
Cisco Umbrella offers advanced threat intelligence and integration, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive security. In comparison, N-able DNS Filtering emphasizes cost-effectiveness and ease of use, making it ideal for budget-conscious organizations seeking essential protection with quick deployment and straightforward management.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust threat intelligence and global coverage, making it suitable for comprehensive cybersecurity needs. In comparison, Whalebone excels with DNS filtering and data protection, providing a cost-effective option with quick deployment, ideal for those valuing straightforward implementation and lower upfront costs.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher setup cost compared to Whalebone, making it a less budget-friendly choice. Whalebone offers a more affordable entry point for organizations looking to implement security solutions.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher setup cost compared to Whalebone, making it a less budget-friendly choice. Whalebone offers a more affordable entry point for organizations looking to implement security solutions.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-layer network security and content filtering. In comparison, HYAS Protect focuses on advanced threat detection and prevention. Cisco’s ease of deployment and competitive pricing appeal to businesses, while HYAS attracts those prioritizing proactive threat intelligence and comprehensive support.
