ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub vs ServiceNow Orchestration comparison

"This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing model."

"Employee onboarding, de-boarding, and other service-provision features make the process easier and it saves us a lot of time."

"This is a user-friendly solution where scripts can be made with ease. There are also many integration options, including Microsoft products, which gives the product a competitive edge."

"Orchestration is commonly utilized by major corporations. The process of linking methods in ServiceNow, known as the RTS chain to parent methods, is executed seamlessly and efficiently. It's quite impressive and significant in its impact."

"The iTerm suite is also crucial for visibility and optimization."

"Great with IT processes and business processes."

"The data visualization is good."

"It has competitive AI capabilities."

"There are a lot of ready to use orchestration custom packs."

"The initial setup of medium complexity. So, there is room for improvement to make it better."

"There can be gaps in integration."

"Efficiency of some features could be improved."

"There should be connectors to cover at least the top industry applications, and they should be easier to configure in a plug-and-play fashion."

"The flow rate for releases and updates is very, very slow and does not meet customers' objectives for scalability."

"The deployment requires awareness among the project staff."

"ServiceNow Orchestration needs to improve multiple aspects in which their event monitoring system is one. The solution lacks event monitoring systems which makes them non-competitive. They need to include improvements in a similar manner that they did in Sweden."

"The automatic remediation needs enhancement, particularly integrating ServiceNow with tools like SolarWinds and Logic Monitor. It is functional, but it needs improvement."

"I would like a user experience module to be added."

"I would rate the pricing a two out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to access. Initially offer free features but over the time the charges rise which make it an expensive solution with limited features. Along with that, the integration issues persist and require additional middle where and internet connectivity for effective usage."

"Pricing is custom to every customer."

"It is not very expensive."

"It is quite expensive because we've had some customers come back and say it's quite pricey because in order for them to go ahead with Orchestration, they must have already been paying for Discovery, service mapping, and a few other things."

"The solution is costly and orchestrations are very expensive."

"ServiceNow doesn't give a clear cost indication. They have different contracts with different organizations and it's all about negotiation, so you don't know how they are doing at the cost level."

"In terms of price, this solution is at the higher end of what you'll find."

"This is an expensive product, but it is the best in the market considering the features and lack of competitors."