Top 10 ServiceNow Orchestration Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

16 reviews
92% willing to recommend

Top ServiceNow Orchestration Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ServiceNow Orchestration based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Camunda, Control-M, and Pega Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. ServiceNow Orchestration surpasses its competitors by streamlining complex automation tasks, integrating seamlessly with other IT systems, and offering unparalleled scalability and reliability, empowering enterprises to improve efficiency and reduce operational costs through effective IT process automation.

ServiceNow Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ServiceNow, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Camunda offers a flexible, open-source orchestration solution ideal for customized deployments. In comparison, ServiceNow Orchestration excels in integration capabilities, automating business processes efficiently. Camunda appeals to cost-conscious users, while ServiceNow is suited for those seeking comprehensive suite integration despite higher costs.

Download Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report

Pricing

Camunda offers a lower initial setup cost, while ServiceNow Orchestration requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a notable difference in entry expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Camunda offers a lower initial setup cost, while ServiceNow Orchestration requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a notable difference in entry expenses.

Control-M

4.4 out of 5

Control-M

4.4 out of 5

Control-M excels in integration and process automation for complex environments, critical for industries like banking. In comparison, ServiceNow Orchestration offers comprehensive IT process automation with a strong focus on service management integration, appealing to businesses seeking extensive cloud scalability and structured deployment.

Download Control-M vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report

Pricing

Control-M has a more affordable setup cost compared to the higher setup expense of ServiceNow Orchestration, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial deployment investments.

View comparison

Pricing

Control-M has a more affordable setup cost compared to the higher setup expense of ServiceNow Orchestration, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial deployment investments.

Pega Platform

4.1 out of 5

Pega Platform

4.1 out of 5

ServiceNow Orchestration excels in automating IT operations with seamless integration and cloud-based service management. In comparison, Pega Platform focuses on case management and workflow automation with adaptability for rapid changes, making it ideal for enterprises aiming for process automation and customer engagement.

Download Pega Platform vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report

Pricing

The Pega Platform is noted for its moderate setup costs, while ServiceNow Orchestration is recognized for having comparatively higher setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

The Pega Platform is noted for its moderate setup costs, while ServiceNow Orchestration is recognized for having comparatively higher setup expenses.

IBM BPM

3.9 out of 5

IBM BPM

3.9 out of 5

IBM BPM excels at integrating complex systems with strong governance and process modeling. In comparison, ServiceNow Orchestration simplifies IT workflows with robust API integrations and a flexible development environment, making it suitable for organizations seeking seamless integration and simplified IT service management.

Download IBM BPM vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report

Pricing

IBM BPM is known for its cost-effectiveness with upfront expenses, while ServiceNow Orchestration tends to involve higher initial setup costs.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM BPM is known for its cost-effectiveness with upfront expenses, while ServiceNow Orchestration tends to involve higher initial setup costs.

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex Process Platform is valued for its integration with SharePoint and automation capabilities, though it requires improvement in management and cost efficiency. In comparison, ServiceNow Orchestration provides robust process automation and integration but struggles with complexity and pricing structure.

Download Nintex Process Platform vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform offers a straightforward setup with clear cost transparency, while ServiceNow Orchestration involves a higher initial setup investment that can impact budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform offers a straightforward setup with clear cost transparency, while ServiceNow Orchestration involves a higher initial setup investment that can impact budget considerations.

Temporal

4.3 out of 5

Temporal

4.3 out of 5

ServiceNow Orchestration is ideal for businesses seeking cost-effective integration and exceptional support. In comparison, Temporal appeals to organizations requiring advanced distributed systems, offering robust functionality and workplace resilience that justifies its pricing. Each product caters to distinct organizational needs and technical expertise.

Download ServiceNow Orchestration vs. Temporal Report

Pricing

ServiceNow Orchestration involves a higher setup cost, while Temporal offers a comparatively economical setup, highlighting the contrast in initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

ServiceNow Orchestration involves a higher setup cost, while Temporal offers a comparatively economical setup, highlighting the contrast in initial investment requirements.

OpenText Operations Orchestration

3.9 out of 5

OpenText Operations Orchestration

3.9 out of 5

OpenText Operations Orchestration offers strong integration capabilities and versatility, appealing to those needing complex automation environments. In comparison, ServiceNow Orchestration provides comprehensive features and seamless cloud integration, benefiting enterprises requiring robust platform services and rapid, feature-rich deployments.

Download OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report

Pricing

OpenText Operations Orchestration involves a lower setup cost, while ServiceNow Orchestration demands a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant cost disparity between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Operations Orchestration involves a lower setup cost, while ServiceNow Orchestration demands a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant cost disparity between the two solutions.

vCenter Orchestrator

4.2 out of 5

vCenter Orchestrator

4.2 out of 5

vCenter Orchestrator excels in workflow creation and VM management with strong VMware integration, appealing to tech buyers focused on virtualization. In comparison, ServiceNow Orchestration offers extensive business process automation and AI tools, suitable for enterprises emphasizing broader service management.

Download ServiceNow Orchestration vs. vCenter Orchestrator Report

Pricing

vCenter Orchestrator offers a low setup cost, while ServiceNow Orchestration's setup cost is relatively higher, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

vCenter Orchestrator offers a low setup cost, while ServiceNow Orchestration's setup cost is relatively higher, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

3.8 out of 5

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

3.8 out of 5

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is an attractive choice for its pricing, integration in Windows environments, and strong support for on-premises setups. In comparison, ServiceNow Orchestration offers cloud-native capabilities, enterprise-wide automation, and a higher ROI from its versatile features.

Download Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report

Pricing

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator incurs a moderate setup cost, while ServiceNow Orchestration requires a more substantial investment, highlighting cost differences.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator incurs a moderate setup cost, while ServiceNow Orchestration requires a more substantial investment, highlighting cost differences.

BMC TrueSight Orchestration

4.0 out of 5

BMC TrueSight Orchestration

4.0 out of 5

BMC TrueSight Orchestration is chosen for its flexibility in automating workflows across diverse systems. In comparison, ServiceNow Orchestration appeals to those seeking a cohesive experience within a platform, providing streamlined automation with better ROI through its integrated suite.

Download BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report

Pricing

BMC TrueSight Orchestration has higher setup costs compared to ServiceNow Orchestration, which maintains more affordable initial expenditure, illustrating a significant difference in upfront investment between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 4 more products

Related categories

Process Automation

Business Process Design

Business Process Management (BPM)