ServiceNow Orchestration vs vCenter Orchestrator comparison

"The data visualization is good."

"This is a user-friendly solution where scripts can be made with ease. There are also many integration options, including Microsoft products, which gives the product a competitive edge."

"The product has a flexible interface for development."

"Employee onboarding, de-boarding, and other service-provision features make the process easier and it saves us a lot of time."

"There are a lot of ready to use orchestration custom packs."

"The iTerm suite is also crucial for visibility and optimization."

"Orchestration is commonly utilized by major corporations. The process of linking methods in ServiceNow, known as the RTS chain to parent methods, is executed seamlessly and efficiently. It's quite impressive and significant in its impact."

"Great with IT processes and business processes."

"It is very stable. I have been using vCenter Orchestrator from version three now to six plus."

"The most valuable feature is workflow automation."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"In regards to the workflows, the fact that we can actually have a full dashboard library of all the existing workflows on this is great. We can see all the workflows and what all the actions do and can work with scripts."

"The stability of the product is very good."

"We can manage and relocate resources easily."

"The most valuable feature is affinity rules."

"The solution is stable."

"I would like a user experience module to be added."

"The automatic remediation needs enhancement, particularly integrating ServiceNow with tools like SolarWinds and Logic Monitor. It is functional, but it needs improvement."

"The deployment requires awareness among the project staff."

"From my space, the only thing that I can say is the spinning up with Google Cloud Services."

"The flow rate for releases and updates is very, very slow and does not meet customers' objectives for scalability."

"There is still room for more integrations. Or, it would be nice to bundle multiple products together rather than selling everything as a model as that turns out to be a bit costly."

"There should be connectors to cover at least the top industry applications, and they should be easier to configure in a plug-and-play fashion."

"Efficiency of some features could be improved."

"I would like to see, from within the Web Console, being able to define the project and custom templates per user; almost like how CloudSpec has approached the solution."

"The solution has a limited count of parallel executions, which can be a bottleneck for larger environments."

"The solution's price could be cheaper."

"The custom workflows are very difficult and confusing."

"There can be compatibility issues."

"This is an expensive solution."

"This solution needs to have more built-in workflows."

"The product’s cost needs improvement."

"It is not very expensive."

"The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to access. Initially offer free features but over the time the charges rise which make it an expensive solution with limited features. Along with that, the integration issues persist and require additional middle where and internet connectivity for effective usage."

"Pricing is custom to every customer."

"In terms of price, this solution is at the higher end of what you'll find."

"The solution is costly and orchestrations are very expensive."

"This is an expensive product, but it is the best in the market considering the features and lack of competitors."

"ServiceNow doesn't give a clear cost indication. They have different contracts with different organizations and it's all about negotiation, so you don't know how they are doing at the cost level."

"It is quite expensive because we've had some customers come back and say it's quite pricey because in order for them to go ahead with Orchestration, they must have already been paying for Discovery, service mapping, and a few other things."

"The price is reasonable, and one of the reasons that this product was selected."

"Our licensing is on a yearly basis. We pay for the license and then we pay the support every year."

"The licensing cost is manageable because they have different versions available, standard, essential, and advanced."

"My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product."

"We renew the solution's license every one or two years."

"We pay a yearly fee, based on our entries."

"My organization didn't have to pay extra for vCenter Orchestrator. It was already included, so it's basically free. Even VMware regular support is included."

"We provide the VMware solution to our clients, for which they pay a perpetual license."