We performed a comparison between Airlock and AWS WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product."
"The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most."
"We can host any DB or application on the solution."
"The customizable features are good."
"The agility is great for us in terms of cloud services in general."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to configure. It just takes a couple of minutes."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"It is Amazon. Everything is scalable. It is beyond what we need."
"As a basic WAF, it's better than nothing. So if you need something simple out of the box with default features, AWS WAF is good."
"The tool must be simplified."
"The area of reporting in the product needs to have a proper format."
"It is sometimes a lot of work going through the rules and making sure you have everything covered for a use case. It is just the way rules are set and maintained in this solution. Some UI changes will probably be helpful. It is not easy to find the documentation of new features. Documentation not being updated is a common problem with all services, including this one. You have different versions of the console, and the options shown in the documentation are not there. For a new feature, there is probably an announcement about being released, but when it comes out, there is no actual documentation about how to use it. This makes you either go to technical support or community, which probably doesn't have an idea either. The documentation on the cloud should be the latest one. Finding information about a specific event can be a bit challenging. For this solution, not much documentation is available in the community. It could be because it is a new tool. Whenever there is an issue, it is just not that simple to resolve, especially if you don't have premium support. You have pretty much nowhere to look around, and you just need to poke around to try and make it work right."
"The setup is complicated."
"It will be helpful if the product recommends rules that we can implement."
"The product must provide more features."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"The solution could improve by having better rules, they are very basic at the moment. There are more attacks coming and we have to use third-party solutions, such as FIA. The features are not sufficient to prevent all the attacks, such as DDoS. Overall the solution should be more secure."
"For now, there is no feature to protect against attack of the bad bots"
Airlock is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews. Airlock is rated 10.0, while AWS WAF is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Airlock writes "Provides endless features and can be adapted to every single application that exists in the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". Airlock is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and Citrix Web App and API Protection, whereas AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.