Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Akamai Identity Cloud vs Symantec Siteminder comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Akamai Identity Cloud
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
28th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Social Login (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (19th)
Symantec Siteminder
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
72
Ranking in other categories
Web Access Management (1st), Access Management (11th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Akamai Identity Cloud?
Share your opinion
Siva Chalamarla - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 5, 2024
Good access control and SSO but needs modernization
The access control and the SSO are the two most valuable features. Siteminder allows users to authenticate once and gain access to multiple applications without needing to reauthenticate for each application separately. For example, if you access one application in one tab, you do not need to provide it again if you are trying to access the same application. The portal has different applications built into it. It's similar to Google. If you open Google and try to access the maps in that Google, you do not need to authenticate in maps. You just need to authenticate in the starting phase. Only a particular group of people have access. Our guys will give an error called access denied or unauthorized access. It depends on the application. It is pretty easy to learn.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution's pricing is competitive."
"The licensing is fair for this solution."
"CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big."
"Siteminder is a little costly. You pay for licensing, and they offer packages, so if you have less users, then you have to buy different products at different prices. If you have more of a user base, then the package is different. They also include other features—for example, if you have a database and you're using Siteminder, then it's good to use a Semantic-specific database, but if you are using less, then you have to purchase the database separately. Whereas if you are going for a bigger license, then it comes within the package. It depends on which plan you are using."
"Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price."
"The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market."
"I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one."
"The pricing is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
34%
Insurance Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Symantec Siteminder?
It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Siteminder?
After Broadcom's acquisition of Symantec, the pricing model for Symantec SiteMinder (now CA Single Sign-On) shifted significantly. The traditional perpetual licensing model transitioned to a subscr...
What needs improvement with Symantec Siteminder?
The support team could work on their response time and overall competence.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Single Sign-On, SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Best Buy, Audi, Fox, IBM, Fiat, Honda
British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Cisco and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.