Top 10 Symantec Siteminder Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

75 reviews
91% willing to recommend

1,211 followers

Top Symantec Siteminder Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Symantec Siteminder based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, and Auth0. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Symantec Siteminder surpasses its competitors by offering robust access management, seamless single sign-on capabilities, and comprehensive security features that ensure scalable enterprise solutions, enhancing user experience and protecting sensitive data efficiently.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Entra ID

4.3 out of 5

Microsoft Entra ID

4.3 out of 5

Symantec Siteminder is known for its robust security policies and integration options. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID offers advanced identity protection and seamless Microsoft service integration. Symantec Siteminder requires a steep learning curve, while Microsoft Entra ID needs better customization. Symantec Siteminder’s support is strong, whereas Microsoft Entra ID provides smoother deployment.

Download Microsoft Entra ID vs. Symantec Siteminder Report

Pricing

Symantec Siteminder has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Entra ID, making it less economical initially.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Siteminder has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Entra ID, making it less economical initially.

Okta Workforce Identity

4.3 out of 5

Okta Workforce Identity

4.3 out of 5

Symantec Siteminder offers reliable access management and robust security, praised for cost-effectiveness but needing improved configuration and documentation. In comparison, Okta Workforce Identity stands out for its integration options and ease of deployment, despite higher costs, delivering superior ROI and customer support.

Download Okta Workforce Identity vs. Symantec Siteminder Report

Pricing

Symantec Siteminder has a higher setup cost compared to Okta Workforce Identity, which offers a more affordable initial setup. Siteminder's implementation process is complex, while Okta provides a more streamlined and user-friendly setup experience.

View comparison

Pricing

Auth0

4.2 out of 5

Auth0

4.2 out of 5

Symantec Siteminder is chosen for its policy-driven security features and extensive integration capabilities. In comparison, Auth0 provides multi-factor authentication and excellent developer support. Symantec Siteminder offers thorough customer service, while Auth0 delivers a smoother deployment and flexible pricing, making it attractive for tech buyers.

Download Auth0 vs. Symantec Siteminder Report

Pricing

Symantec Siteminder requires a higher setup cost compared to Auth0, which has a more budget-friendly initial expense for users.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Siteminder requires a higher setup cost compared to Auth0, which has a more budget-friendly initial expense for users.

Ping Identity Platform

4.1 out of 5

Ping Identity Platform

4.1 out of 5

Symantec Siteminder attracts budget-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and comprehensive support. In comparison, Ping Identity Platform offers advanced features and modern deployment options, appealing to organizations seeking flexibility and wide integration capabilities for detailed identity management solutions.

Download Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder Report

Pricing

Symantec Siteminder involves a higher setup cost, while Ping Identity Platform offers a more economical initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Siteminder involves a higher setup cost, while Ping Identity Platform offers a more economical initial investment.

IBM Security Verify Access

3.9 out of 5

IBM Security Verify Access

3.9 out of 5

Symantec Siteminder is favored for its pricing and support, offering robust security features and easy integration. In comparison, IBM Security Verify Access offers advanced access controls and a variety of authentication methods. Symantec requires simplified setup, while IBM needs better documentation and configuration flexibility.

Download IBM Security Verify Access vs. Symantec Siteminder Report

Pricing

Symantec Siteminder typically has higher setup costs compared to IBM Security Verify Access, making the latter a more budget-friendly choice.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Siteminder typically has higher setup costs compared to IBM Security Verify Access, making the latter a more budget-friendly choice.

Red Hat Single Sign On

4.3 out of 5

Red Hat Single Sign On

4.3 out of 5

Symantec Siteminder is noted for its robust security features and seamless integrations. In comparison, Red Hat Single Sign On excels in flexibility due to its open-source nature. Symantec Siteminder enjoys simpler deployment, while Red Hat Single Sign On offers better long-term ROI and customization.

Download Red Hat Single Sign On vs. Symantec Siteminder Report

Pricing

Symantec Siteminder setup cost is higher due to extensive features and customization, while Red Hat Single Sign On offers a lower initial setup cost with a more streamlined deployment. Differences in setup costs highlight varying approaches and capabilities in each solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Access Management

Web Access Management