Oracle Access Manager vs Symantec Siteminder comparison

Oracle and Broadcom are both solutions in the Access Management category. Oracle is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0, while Broadcom is ranked #11 with an average rating of 6.8. Oracle holds a 2.4% mindshare in AM, compared to Broadcom’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Oracle Access Manager

Read 18 Oracle Access Manager reviews

863 Views
486 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Symantec Siteminder

Read 74 Symantec Siteminder reviews

1,494 Views
1,110 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Symantec Siteminder

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Symantec Siteminder and Oracle Access Manager are leading access management solutions. Oracle Access Manager generally has the upper hand in features and deployment efficiency, while Symantec Siteminder is appreciated for its pricing and customer service.

Features: User reviews highlight the robust security, policy management, and cost-effectiveness of Symantec Siteminder. Oracle Access Manager is praised for its comprehensive integration capabilities, advanced authentication methods, and wider feature set.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Siteminder needs better documentation, a more intuitive configuration process, and enhanced scalability. Oracle Access Manager's complexity can be a barrier, and users suggest making the interface more user-friendly and improving performance under high loads.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Siteminder scores higher on deployment simplicity, with users finding the setup straightforward. Oracle Access Manager, while more complex to deploy, benefits from extensive customer support that mitigates deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Siteminder is cost-effective with quick ROI and lower setup costs. Oracle Access Manager, despite higher initial expenses, offers better long-term value due to its advanced capabilities and integration options, justifying the higher cost with superior ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Siteminder

Ranking in Access Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (12th), Web Access Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Siteminder is 3.8%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Upendar G

Senior Consultant at Wipro Limited

Efficiently manage applications with secure single sign-on and streamlined operations

Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access. Its ability to consolidate applications on a single interface streamlines operations significantly. The product is highly secure and reliable, especially in managing user access across various platforms. Multi-factor authentication enhances security by requiring additional verification steps.

Read full review

Muzi Lubisi

Senior technical Consultant at CA Africa

Improved user experience with seamless integration and easy installation

The feature that I mostly valued is the ease of installation on different systems, especially on Windows. Additionally, it is very beneficial for deploying single sign-on sessions between different windows on a web browser, provided I am connected to the right identity provider. That seamless integration significantly improves user experience and efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively."

"I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one."

"Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products."

"Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"The most important functions of Oracle Access Manager are single sign-on and its integration capability with different applications."

"The product allows customization via custom code."

"The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

"You can quickly deploy the entire product with a basic config within couple of hours."

"It provides the breadth and the width to provide solutions for the different kinds of technologies which we have."

"The solution is easy to use for our managers."

"The feature that I mostly valued is the ease of installation on different systems, especially on Windows."

"We almost never have outages nor see slowdowns."

"Right now, federation that comes out-of-the-box with single sign-on is the most valuable feature that we have, and also scalability."

"It has considerably reduced the amount of time that new users would take to join into the organization. Previously, it was a lengthy, manual process because it's a very secure environment, where they need to verify the user before they can actually grant him a user-ID and password. Integrating with the built-in custom application, and exposing CA Single Sign On to the internet, we were able to get the employees onboard. The time that we gained was: previously it would generally take from four to eight weeks for each employee, we brought it to one to two days."

"Federation is valuable, for sure, because we have a lot of third-party vendors that we need to integrate with, and this is a turnkey solution in some ways."

More Symantec Siteminder pros

Cons

"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."

"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."

"Sometimes if a session takes too long, you have to log in again."

"Multi-factor authentication requires a lot of processes and technicalities."

"To improve Oracle Access Manager, they should consider integrating more policies and enhancing automation, especially in managing server load and cache cleanup."

"The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality."

"The performance of Oracle Access Manager could be improved. It should be quick to install, but it wasn't, so this is another area for improvement. The Oracle Access Manager console also has room for improvement because it's slow."

"There are problems with stability."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

"The initial setup was complex, painful. But that is to be expected of any new setup. When you're a big bank like us, any kind of migration to a new product is hard. I expect it to be painful, and it was painful. But it's not something that you can avoid."

"If the reporting feature can be integrated into SSO itself that will be an icing on the cake."

"They need to make configurations easier, and not have the engineer having to guess what will happen when he changes a particular setting."

"The main thing is we do not have the traceability and good monitoring that CA can provide us to capture problems when they occur."

"In future releases, I would like to see maybe more capabilities with some more modern authentication."

"I would prefer to see their SAML integration be a more streamlined and easier interface."

"The support could be faster."

"All the problems that we reported actually have never been resolved. We could not capture enough information for CA to be able to debug the problem."

More Symantec Siteminder cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is affordable."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"The product is a little expensive."

"CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big."

"The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market."

"Siteminder is a little costly. You pay for licensing, and they offer packages, so if you have less users, then you have to buy different products at different prices. If you have more of a user base, then the package is different. They also include other features—for example, if you have a database and you're using Siteminder, then it's good to use a Semantic-specific database, but if you are using less, then you have to purchase the database separately. Whereas if you are going for a bigger license, then it comes within the package. It depends on which plan you are using."

"The licensing is fair for this solution."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is competitive."

"Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price."

"I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

36%

Insurance Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Access Manager?

The product supports customization.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than alternatives like Okta and CyberArk. Although it offers robust security, the cost might not justify its features for organizations with fewer applications.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

To improve Oracle Access Manager, they should consider integrating more policies and enhancing automation, especially in managing server load and cache cleanup. Enhancements in automation would eas...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Siteminder?

It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Siteminder?

When considering pricing, I have usually advised on the Microsoft solution, but compared to that, Symantec SiteMinder’s pricing is moderately priced. I would rate it a four on a scale where one is ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Siteminder?

I need to check the latest documentation, however, being able to expand or at least communicate with other identity providers to perform handshakes would be great. While I have some integration wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Security Verify Access vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 53% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 21% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Auth0 vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Ping Identity Platform vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 45% of the time

ForgeRock vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 29% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 14% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 8% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Siteminder Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

March 2025

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Siteminder

March 2025

Download Symantec Siteminder product report

Also Known As

No data available

SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder

Overview

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder

March 2025

Free Report: Oracle Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Access Manager vs. Symantec Siteminder report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.