Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alluvio AppResponse vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management comparison

Riverbed and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #50 with an average rating of 7.0. Riverbed holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Broadcom’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Alluvio AppResponse
Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews
  • 2,029 Views
  • 933 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...
Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews
  • 567 Views
  • 567 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management are two robust tools in the application performance monitoring category. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management shows an edge in advanced features, while Alluvio AppResponse is praised for its pricing and support.

What features are offered by Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

Alluvio AppResponse offers comprehensive data analytics, real-time traffic analysis, and effective pricing. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management includes detailed cross-environment monitoring, predictive analytics, and advanced features for complex environments.

What areas of improvement can be found in Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

Alluvio AppResponse needs to enhance integration capabilities, allow more customization, and improve user documentation. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management should work on easing its learning curve, providing more comprehensive documentation, and making its interface more intuitive.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

Alluvio AppResponse is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management requires more initial setup time but offers in-depth customer service support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

Alluvio AppResponse is seen as cost-effective with a quick ROI, suited for smaller to mid-sized deployments. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, while more expensive, provides long-term benefits for larger enterprises due to its rich feature set.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
47th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (55th)
Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
50th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Alluvio AppResponse0.5%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management0.4%
Other99.1%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

SK
Satyam Kumar
Senior Technical Engineer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Identifies and analyzes performance issues quickly using in-built AI and ML
With Alluvio AppResponse, there is an in-built analytical analysis with AI and ML, which identifies and provides data such as the number of TCP retransmits, web access time, total connection time out, total connections established, and server-side errors. The RTCC response time composition chart is crucial because it helps pinpoint the issue's origin, whether from the server, network, or application side. It's a superb product when compared to SolarWinds SAM, which is agent-based, while Alluvio AppResponse captures all traffic from the core switch.
Read full review
Mohammed Shahpoup - PeerSpot reviewer
Mohammed Shahpoup
Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr
Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."
"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."
"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."
"AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture."
"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"
"We really like the scalability capabilities."
"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."
More Alluvio AppResponse pros
"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."
"The technical support and documentation are quite good."
 

Cons

"They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors."
"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."
"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."
"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
"Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."
"The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward."
"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."
More Alluvio AppResponse cons
"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."
"They lack support and presence in Egypt."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
"It is costly for small and medium businesses."
"The solution is no more expensive than other products."
"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Media Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise10
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
We are the partner of Riverbed. Once any customer buys the Riverbed product, we deploy and configure it to meet their use cases. Alluvio AppResponse can identify if a page or an application is slow...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has suc...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 9% of the time
Elastic Observability vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Elastic Observability vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 6% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 6% of the time
Dynatrace vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Dynatrace vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 5% of the time
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 5% of the time
More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
February 2026
Alluvio AppResponse reportDownload Alluvio AppResponse product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
February 2026
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reportDownload Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report
 

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
 

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
February 2026
Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.