Alluvio AppResponse vs Elastic Observability comparison

Riverbed and Elastic are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #49 with an average rating of 8.0, while Elastic is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1. Riverbed holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to Elastic’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

Alluvio AppResponse

Read 16 Alluvio AppResponse reviews

437 Views
280 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 26 Elastic Observability reviews

10,583 Views
9,187 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Alluvio AppResponse

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and Elastic Observability are both prominent tools in the observability and monitoring space. Elastic Observability seems to have the upper hand due to its superior features, which many users feel are worth the additional cost.

What features are offered by Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Elastic Observability?

Alluvio AppResponse is valued for its deep packet inspection, application performance monitoring, and robust network traffic analysis. Elastic Observability is praised for its scalability, seamless integration with other Elastic products, and advanced anomaly detection.

What areas of improvement can be found in Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Elastic Observability?

Users suggest that Alluvio AppResponse could benefit from enhancing its reporting capabilities, modernizing its infrastructure, and improving its user interface. For Elastic Observability, feedback indicates that it requires better out-of-the-box dashboards, improvements in data ingestion efficiency, and more intuitive navigation.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Elastic Observability?

Alluvio AppResponse users find the deployment process relatively straightforward and commend the responsive customer service. Elastic Observability users report a longer deployment time but appreciate the extensive support resources available.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Elastic Observability?

Alluvio AppResponse users find the setup costs reasonable and report satisfactory return on investment. Elastic Observability has higher setup costs, but users feel the advanced features justify the expense and offer considerable ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Elastic Observability

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

49th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (61st)

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Log Management (14th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 5.8%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Kilic

Network and Security Unit Manager at Bankalararası Kart Merkezi (BKM)

It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels

I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.

Read full review

Adelina Craciun

Product Owner at Swisscom

Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments

The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they want to monitor, the granularity of it, the changes in the threshold, and the anomalies that they want reported all require some development. So far, every single request has been fulfilled.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We really like the scalability capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."

"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."

"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"

"It's a stable product. Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall."

"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."

"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."

"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."

More Alluvio AppResponse pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is centralized logging. Elastic Common Search helps us to search for the logs across the organization."

"It has always been a stable solution."

"It's easy to deploy, and it's very flexible."

"The solution is open-source and helps with back-end logging. It is also easy to handle."

"Elastic provides built-in features for queries and report generation. It's a very good tool for monitoring integration capabilities."

"We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical."

"The architecture and system's stability are simple."

"It is very stable, and I would rate it ten out of ten based on my interaction with it."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."

"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."

"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."

"Technical support needs to be more responsive."

"They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors."

"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

More Alluvio AppResponse cons

"Simplifying the parsing of logs and manual efforts would also be beneficial."

"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."

"There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities."

"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful."

"In the future, Elastic APM needs a portfolio iTool. They can provide an easy way to develop the custom UI for Kibana."

"More web features could be added to the product."

"I am familiar with Azure Monitor, which I find more user-friendly compared to Elastic, which is a very technical tool."

"Elastic Observability is reactive rather than proactive. It should act as an ITSM tool and be able to create tickets and alerts on Jira."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is no more expensive than other products."

"It is costly for small and medium businesses."

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

On the government side, pricing is pretty competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

From a feature set perspective, there are multiple tools that are used, and unfortunately, deeper questions are geared towards actual users. The recent changes in corporate structure may have cause...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability is cost-efficient and provides all features in the enterprise license without asset-based licensing. However, sizing and licensing information could be clearer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

Of course, maintenance is necessary, as with any software, requiring updates with the latest features and security enhancements. It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like netw...

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 66% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 34% of the time

More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 15% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 13% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Elastic Observability

Compared 8% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2025

Download Alluvio AppResponse product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

February 2025

Download Elastic Observability product report

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert

No data available

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Elastic

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Elastic Observability

January 2025

Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.