Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS WAF vs Amazon CloudFront comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon CloudFront
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
CDN (4th)
AWS WAF
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Amazon CloudFront and AWS WAF aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Amazon CloudFront is designed for CDN and holds a mindshare of 10.0%, down 12.6% compared to last year.
AWS WAF, on the other hand, focuses on Web Application Firewall (WAF), holds 13.7% mindshare, down 15.4% since last year.
CDN
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

XYX ABC - PeerSpot reviewer
Top-notch in terms of customer service and offers pay-as-you-go model with a free tier
With a mixed stack, things become a problem. With GCP and Azure, the DNS setup gets tricky when using CloudFront. With AWS, it's smooth and streamlined. Their GUI provides all the details and is very easy to navigate. The challenge starts to occur because AWS gives you only one DNS endpoint for the entire service. This single endpoint covers your CDN, AWS server, and domain migration needs. If you use any other solution like GCP or Azure, you face additional configuration changes and account management. You need separate accounts for AWS CloudFront and your chosen platform, like GCP. This means securing and managing two separate accounts – an extra responsibility. With Cloudflare, you just need one account and pay for it. Managing the complex DNS details isn't your burden. However, on the flip side, CloudFront might require more hands-on management on your part.
Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks
Integrating AWS WAF with other AWS services in our infrastructure is fairly easy. There are different tools through which we can do it. AWS WAF is a fairly easy solution. Users need to build a few rules by themselves based on the vulnerability attack within the application. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the number of servers they can put your content in while being reliable."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the availability of the websites."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to deliver content to users nearby."
"The solution improves performance by reducing latency and cost."
"Amazon CloudFront is a stable solution."
"It has built-in DDoS protection, which protects against DDoS attacks."
"The best feature of Amazon CloudFront is its simplified process and easy integration."
"The most beneficial feature is capturing the static data, which is crucial for our operations."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"I believe the most impressive features are integration and ease of use. The best part of AWS WAF is the cloud-native WAF integration. There aren't any hidden deployments or hidden infrastructure which we have to maintain to have AWS WAF. AWS maintains everything; all we have to do is click the button, and WAF will be activated. Any packet coming through the internet will be filtered through."
"The customizable features are good."
"We integrate AWS WAF with several platforms within cloud hosting and other security solutions and provisions in our business. Regarding AI, it's been around for about 20 years, so it's not new. It's just a new buzzword. I've been in security for 30 years and remember using AI when I started 25-30 years ago. We have multiple forms of AI within our business."
"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"AWS WAF is very easy to use and configure on AWS."
"The solution is stable."
"If hackers try to insert bugs, the tool blocks it."
 

Cons

"A lot of caching features must be added to the solution."
"The only issues we've faced were when AWS itself had problems, and that's very rare. I can only recall one instance when they had issues, but they managed to resolve it quickly."
"CloudFront could improve in the areas of auto-scaling, reports, and insights. End clients desire more detailed reports to understand usage patterns better."
"Support needs to be enhanced."
"The solution could be more simplified for new users. It could be more user-friendly."
"Sometimes, the server goes down automatically."
"They should have more Edge locations so that CloudFront can be used much more. If they can make it a little bit cheaper and better than other networks, we will be able to use it more."
"The support must be improved."
"An improvement area would be that it's more of a manual effort when you have to enable rules. That's one of the downsides. If that can be done in an automated way, it would be great. That's a lagging feature currently."
"We should be able to do proper whitelisting."
"It is sometimes a lot of work going through the rules and making sure you have everything covered for a use case. It is just the way rules are set and maintained in this solution. Some UI changes will probably be helpful. It is not easy to find the documentation of new features. Documentation not being updated is a common problem with all services, including this one. You have different versions of the console, and the options shown in the documentation are not there. For a new feature, there is probably an announcement about being released, but when it comes out, there is no actual documentation about how to use it. This makes you either go to technical support or community, which probably doesn't have an idea either. The documentation on the cloud should be the latest one. Finding information about a specific event can be a bit challenging. For this solution, not much documentation is available in the community. It could be because it is a new tool. Whenever there is an issue, it is just not that simple to resolve, especially if you don't have premium support. You have pretty much nowhere to look around, and you just need to poke around to try and make it work right."
"The solution is cloud-based, and therefore the billing model that comes with it could be more intuitive, in my opinion. It's very easy to not fully understand how you tag things for billing and then you can quite easily run up a high bill without realizing it. The solution needs to be more intuitive around the tagging system, which enables the billing. Right now, I have a cloud architect that does that on our behalf and it isn't something that a business user could use because it still requires quite a lot of technical knowledge to do effectively."
"Technical support for AWS WAF needs improvement."
"Compatibility and integration functionalities, especially with services like Kafka for event-driven messaging, could be better."
"I would like to see the addition of more advanced rate-limiting features in the next release. It would be beneficial to extend rate limiting beyond just web servers to the main node level."
"The solution should identify why it blocks particular websites."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We do not have many options to optimize costs."
"Amazon CloudFront is an expensive solution."
"Its price is really on the high side. It should be cheaper in general."
"The solution’s price is reasonable."
"I used to work with AWS and Azure, and we provided cost comparisons for customers to help them choose the right services. Azure tends to be more user-friendly and easier to understand, while AWS may take more time."
"I rate Amazon CloudFront's pricing a five out of ten."
"Amazon CloudFront costs less than third-party services."
"The product has a mid-range pricing."
"The solution is affordable."
"AWS is not that costly by comparison. They are maybe close to $40 per month. I think it was between $29 or $39."
"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"There are different scale options available for WAF."
"The pricing should be more affordable, especially as it pertains to small clients."
"AWS WAF is pay-as-you-go, I only pay for what I'm using. There is no subscription or any payment upfront, I can terminate use at any time. Which is an advantage."
"The price is average."
"There are no separate licensing costs we pay for since it is included in the plan we purchase."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CDN solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
24%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between AWS Global Accelerator and Amazon CloudFront?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Global Accelerator or Amazon CloudFront global content delivery network was the better fit for us. We decided to go w...
What do you like most about Amazon CloudFront?
The solution has good security features.
What are the limitations of AWS WAF vs alternative WAFs?
Hi Varun, I have had experienced with several WAF deployments and deep technical assessments of the following: 1. Imperva WAF 2. F5 WAF 3. Polarisec Cloud WAF Typical limitations on cloud WAF is t...
How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...
What do you like most about AWS WAF?
The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is its highly configurable rules system.
 

Also Known As

No data available
AWS Web Application Firewall
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Unilever, Spotify, Pinterest, MLB Advanced Media, Foursquare, PBS, Airbnb, Netflix, WIX, Comcast, Automobili Lamborghini, Rovio, Discovery Communications
eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Microsoft, Akamai and others in CDN. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.