Amazon CloudWatch vs AppNeta by Broadcom comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2, while Broadcom is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.6% mindshare in CMS, compared to Broadcom’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Amazon CloudWatch

Read 46 Amazon CloudWatch reviews

2,314 Views
1,985 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

AppNeta by Broadcom

Read 17 AppNeta by Broadcom reviews

1,083 Views
383 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon CloudWatch

AppNeta by Broadcom

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

AppNeta by Broadcom and Amazon CloudWatch are competitors in network and performance monitoring solutions, each catering to different needs. Although AppNeta has attractive pricing and customer support, Amazon CloudWatch holds an advantage due to its wide-ranging features, making it a worthwhile investment for many users.

Features: AppNeta offers in-depth network insights with features like path analysis, performance monitoring, and the ability to capture and analyze packet flow. On the other hand, Amazon CloudWatch provides cloud infrastructure monitoring with capabilities such as real-time metric collection, alarms, logs, and integration with various AWS services.

Room for Improvement: AppNeta can improve by expanding its cloud management features, enhancing its user interface, and increasing integration with third-party tools. For Amazon CloudWatch, enhancements could be made in simplifying its learning curve, optimizing cost predictability, and improving support for non-AWS environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AppNeta deploys rapidly, benefiting from simple setup processes and direct customer support. Amazon CloudWatch, although it takes time to master due to its extensive features, is bolstered by detailed documentation and the AWS community, making it a suitable choice for those within the AWS ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: AppNeta features a straightforward pricing model with a lower initial cost, making it appealing for network performance solutions. In contrast, Amazon CloudWatch's pricing is variable, based on usage, offering a scalable financial model for comprehensive cloud service management and improved cost-effectiveness over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon CloudWatch vs. AppNeta by Broadcom Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon CloudWatch vs. AppNeta by Broadcom

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon CloudWatch

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (13th), Log Management (14th)

AppNeta by Broadcom

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (34th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (7th), DX NetOps (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Amazon CloudWatch is 2.6%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AppNeta by Broadcom is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Rasanpreet Singh

Senior Consultant at Infosys

Reliable AWS monitoring and logging

The choice of logging solution should always be determined by the specific business requirements. It is crucial to align the logging strategy with what type of logs are needed and how they should be used. There are instances where we require custom solutions to retrieve logs, especially application logs that may not be easily accessible through CloudWatch or similar services. When we heavily rely on AWS native services, CloudWatch is indeed a robust choice. However, in certain scenarios, we might need integration capabilities with other tools, and if they can incorporate such features, it would enhance overall logging capabilities. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Cliff Chapman

Architect at Linkstatus Ltd

Excellent support, easy configuration, and a reliable tool to know what the problem is and where the problem is

They should try and make diagnostics run a bit quicker. When the problem occurs on a network, AppNeta runs automatic diagnostics on the end-to-end path. The path it was testing only to the destination, it now runs the same test to all of the devices and all the intermediate devices. Depending on the number of intermediate devices, it can take several minutes to run. If we're trying to find or diagnose a problem that only lasts two or three minutes, it may be that the diagnostics is still running by the time the problem is cleared. The only thing, which I have also mentioned to AppNeta in the past, is that there should be much faster and much more lightweight diagnostics, which can be completed within 30 seconds or one minute, rather than in 5 to 10 minutes. Currently, when we have short-duration problems, we use a different tool, but we only use that different tool for short-duration problems. With AppNeta, as long as the problem exists for more than a few minutes, such as within 10 to 15 minutes, we can normally tell where the problem is. However, most of the problems that we deal with are intermittent. They're very rarely a permanent condition that needs to be addressed. That makes it more difficult to troubleshoot. We would look to see at least two or three events and hope they show the same results to raise our confidence that we've actually found the problem, rather than just a problem.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch is reliability."

"We have found the pricing to be reasonable."

"We use Amazon CloudWatch for logging."

"Our team finds it overall quite useful."

"You can enable alarms and metrics, and it has robust integration with AWS services. You can also trigger events. For example, if the CPU utilization is above 80%, it can launch a new instance for you."

"The product helps us collect and store various metrics to set test alarms."

"The most valuable features of Amazon CloudWatch are metrics, dashboards, alarms, logs, events, logs insight, and application insights."

"The initial setup is easy."

More Amazon CloudWatch pros

"The product helps us understand networks and user experience. It helps us to understand the issues."

"The main feature that we use is what they call Delivery, which is the testing of network paths end-to-end."

"The solution's technical support is very good."

"We get complete, hop-by-hop visibility into the internet and we can know how much latency is taking place from one hop to another. That way, we know whether a particular hop belongs to the ISP, or that it is something owned by our own client's office, or is something to do with the SaaS network."

"Delivery and experience are valuable. The usage in terms of the traffic application captures and other similar things is also valuable."

"A lot of times one of the AppNeta transactions showed that there is an issue, whereas everything seemed to be working properly. Once we dug into it, we realized that it really was highlighting a problem that otherwise we would not have seen."

"This solution helps prove that, if we move to cloud, we'll still be as effective as we are on-premises."

Cons

"The dashboard and the UI could improve in Amazon CloudWatch. Additionally, they should focus on visibility inside the servers with AI and machine learning integrations. This would allow users who are using the solution to see what is happening within the system better."

"The solution should provide human-readable metrics."

"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."

"I found several areas for improvement in Amazon CloudWatch. First is that it's tough to track issues and find out where it's going wrong. The process takes longer. For example, if I get an exception error, I read the logs, search, go to AWS Cloud, then to the groups to find the keyword to determine what's wrong. Another area for improvement in Amazon CloudWatch is that it's slow in terms of log streaming. It requires an entire twenty-four hours for scanning, rather than just one hour. This issue can be solved with Elasticsearch streaming with Kibana, but it requires a lot of development effort and integration with Kibana or Splunk, and this also means I need a separate developer and software technical stack to do the indexing and streaming to Kibana. It's a manual effort that you need to do properly, so log streaming should be improved in Amazon CloudWatch. The AWS support person should also have a better understanding of the logs in Amazon CloudWatch. What I'd like added to the solution is a more advanced search function, particularly one that can tell you more information or special information. Right now, the search function is difficult to use because it only gives you limited data. For example, I got an error message saying that the policy wasn't created. I only know the amount the customer paid for the policy, the mobile number, and the customer name, but if I use those details, the information won't show up on the logs. I need to enter more details, so that's the type of fuzzy matching Amazon CloudWatch won't provide. If this type of search functionality is provided, it will be very helpful for businesses and companies that provide professional services to customers, like ours."

"Amazon CloudWatch needs improvement. The main thing is we have noticed missing logs."

"When customers want to see the CPU or memory utilization there is a cost. This should be free to see the utilization."

"It would be beneficial for CloudWatch to provide an API interface and some kind of custom configuration."

"It's not an advanced way of monitoring."

More Amazon CloudWatch cons

"Cloud monitoring could be better. That's one of the biggest pain points for me. I have shared this feedback with them multiple times, but they're limited to some extent. That's one area where I've seen a problem."

"AppNeta by Broadcom needs to add more features to its dashboards. It also needs to work on providing out-of-the-box reports."

"I would like to see some advanced dashboard features. It could also be integrated with third-party tools. For example, an integration with a reporting solution would be helpful. Out-of-the-box, there are few dashboards or reports. What it does have is useful, but there should be additional dashboards."

"They should try and make diagnostics run a bit quicker. When the problem occurs on a network, AppNeta runs automatic diagnostics on the end-to-end path. The path it was testing only to the destination, it now runs the same test to all of the devices and all the intermediate devices. Depending on the number of intermediate devices, it can take several minutes to run. If we're trying to find or diagnose a problem that only lasts two or three minutes, it may be that the diagnostics is still running by the time the problem is cleared. The only thing, which I have also mentioned to AppNeta in the past, is that there should be much faster and much more lightweight diagnostics, which can be completed within 30 seconds or one minute, rather than in 5 to 10 minutes."

"Instead of integrating with other people, they should expand their interior capabilities."

"I think some of the product's documentation has shortcomings and needs improvement."

"Having to deal with configuring the end devices using a USB stick is a bit cumbersome. It would be nice if there was a better way of handling that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon CloudWatch has very cheap pricing, and it hardly costs my company $25-$30 a month for fifty systems, so it's pretty affordable."

"The pricing model is pay-as-you-go so you have to be mindful of usage to manage costs."

"The tool is not expensive."

"We have monthly licensing costs. The licenses are probably in the vicinity of about $300 - $350/month."

"The pricing is average."

"The pricing can be considered reasonable, especially when already operating on a cloud platform."

"What's were using is the free service of Amazon CloudWatch, so they're not charging us. As for hidden fees, we're not aware of them because we're using what our clients provided us."

"Its pricing is reasonable. It is sometimes tricky, but it is reasonable as compared to others."

More Amazon CloudWatch pricing and cost advice

"I find the solution's price to be fairly good."

"AppNeta by Broadcom is not expensive."

"Broadcom software is always a little expensive because they provide quality."

"We typically don't get involved in the commercial side, but the list price is probably something like $3,000 for a small probe. However, that gives all of the features that the probe can do, whether or not you use them. In the old days, up until two or three years ago, each of the separate features was a separately licensable module so that you could add things that you wanted, and you didn't have to add things that you didn't want. They've changed all that now, and everything the probe can do is a part of the base license."

"I inherited this from a different version, and I haven't yet gone through a renewal because we had purchased three years upfront. So, to me, that still remains to be seen. Once it comes up for renewal, we'll see what happens. Especially because now it is Broadcom, it is going to change anyway."

"The small probe is probably around $3,000 and the very large probe that they make for massive data centers might be $50,000 or $60,000. It's a subscription model, so the payment is per year."

"It's worth the money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

42%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon CloudWatch?

The monitoring features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon CloudWatch?

Amazon CloudWatch charges more for custom metrics as well as for changes in the timeline, which I see as a disadvantage given the price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon CloudWatch?

Amazon CloudWatch charges extra for custom metrics, which is a significant disadvantage. Another aspect that needs improvement is the look and feel of custom dashboards, which currently do not matc...

See all answers

What open source tool can one use to measure bandwidth from one's upstream service provider?

One I am looking closely at is AppNeta. They have an appliance that can digest the flow and do a better job than Netflow. The other one we are using is ExtraHop. This has both a Datacenter Hig...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppNeta?

The product helps us understand networks and user experience. It helps us to understand the issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppNeta?

AppNeta by Broadcom is not expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 21% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 16% of the time

Zabbix vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon CloudWatch Competitors

ThousandEyes vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 55% of the time

DX NetOps vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 11% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 10% of the time

Observer GigaStor vs AppNeta by Broadcom

Compared 8% of the time

More AppNeta by Broadcom Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon CloudWatch

April 2025

Download Amazon CloudWatch product report

Buyer's Guide

AppNeta by Broadcom

April 2025

Download AppNeta by Broadcom product report

Overview

Amazon CloudWatch is used for monitoring, tracking logs, and organizing metrics across AWS services. It detects anomalies, sets dynamic alarms, and automates actions to optimize cloud utilization, troubleshoot, and ensure service availability.

Organizations leverage Amazon CloudWatch for collecting and analyzing logs, triggering alerts, and profiling application performance. It's also employed for monitoring bandwidth, virtual machines, Lambda functions, and Kubernetes clusters. Valuable features include seamless integration with AWS, real-time data and alerts, detailed metrics, and a user-friendly interface. It provides robust monitoring capabilities for infrastructure and application performance, log aggregation, and analytics. Users appreciate its scalability, ease of setup, and affordability. Additional key aspects are the ability to create alarms, dashboards, and automated responses, along with detailed insights into system and application health. Room for improvement includes dashboards and UI enhancements for better visualization and customizability, log streaming speed, advanced machine learning and reporting capabilities, pricing, and integration with non-AWS services and databases. Users also seek more real-time monitoring and comprehensive application performance features, and simpler alerts and configuration processes.

What are the most important features?

Seamless integration with AWS: Ensures smooth operation with AWS services.
Real-time data and alerts: Provides immediate insights and notifications.
Detailed metrics: Offers in-depth data on infrastructure and application performance.
Scalability: Supports growing needs with ease.
Ease of setup: Quick and straightforward installation.
Affordability: Cost-effective monitoring solution.
Alarms and dashboards: Customizable alerts and visual insights.
Automated responses: Facilitates automatic actions based on set criteria.
System and application health insights: Delivers comprehensive health reports.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Optimized cloud utilization: Ensures efficient use of resources.
Improved troubleshooting: Identifies and resolves issues quickly.
Enhanced service availability: Keeps services running smoothly.
Effective log analysis: Provides valuable insights from collected logs.
Performance profiling: Assesses and optimizes application performance.
Scalable monitoring: Adapts to growing business needs.

Amazon CloudWatch is implemented across a range of industries, including technology, finance, healthcare, and retail. Technology firms use it to monitor application performance and traffic, while financial organizations leverage it for ensuring compliance and system reliability. Healthcare entities rely on it for maintaining service availability and monitoring data flow, and retail companies utilize it for tracking customer interactions and optimizing server usage.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AppNeta is the leader in proactive end-user performance monitoring solutions built for the distributed digital enterprise. With AppNeta, IT and Network Ops teams can assure continuous and exceptional delivery of business-critical applications. AppNeta’s SaaS-based solutions give IT teams essential application and network performance data, allowing them to constantly monitor user experience across any application, network, data center or cloud.

For more information, visit www.appneta.com.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

AirAsia, Airbnb, Aircel, APUS, Avazu, Casa & Video, Futbol Club Barcelona (FCBarcelona), National Taiwan University, redBus

Ebay, Citrix, National Instruments, Marriott, AT&T, Bon-Ton, McDonald's, Netflix, PayPal, Uber, QAD

Buyer's Guide

Amazon CloudWatch vs. AppNeta by Broadcom

March 2025

Free Report: Amazon CloudWatch vs. AppNeta by Broadcom

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon CloudWatch vs. AppNeta by Broadcom and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon CloudWatch vs. AppNeta by Broadcom report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.