We performed a comparison between AppWorx Workload Automation and Automic Workload Automation based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AppWorx Workload Automation is highly praised for its easy-to-use interface and dependable performance. Users appreciate its simplicity and efficiency in managing nightly tasks and performing calculations. Automic Workload Automation is known for its impressive strength, scalability, and seamless integration. It offers seamless control over various operating systems and products, along with pre-defined templates and convenient web browser access.
The users recommend that AppWorx Workload Automation should focus on improving API integration, integration with other tools, and scalability. Automic Workload Automation needs enhancements in automation sets, language support, functionality, user interface, web-based edition, file transfer, pricing, and support.
Service and Support: AppWorx Workload Automation has been praised for its customer service and highly rated technical support. Automic Workload Automation has received mixed feedback, with some customers praising the support while others have faced challenges in reaching the team.
Ease of Deployment: AppWorx Workload Automation's initial setup is considered relatively easy. However, it can be a time-consuming process. Administrator access and involvement are necessary for the setup. Automic Workload Automation's setup time and complexity can vary. It can be completed within one to five days, depending on the specific requirements.
Pricing: AppWorx Workload Automation has a costly setup determined by the number of orchestrated systems used. Automic Workload Automation has made pricing and licensing changes, making it more affordable. It is considered one of the most expensive options on the market, as the cost depends on the number of systems being orchestrated.
ROI: There are no specific details about the ROI for AppWorx Workload Automation. Users mentioned Automic Workload Automation was not renewed due to cost-cutting measures, indicating it was seen as an extra cost.
Comparison Results: Automic Workload Automation is the preferred choice over AppWorx Workload Automation. Users appreciate its robustness, scalability, and ease of implementation. They also commend its extensive features and user-friendly interface. Automic Workload Automation offers a versatile single solution that can handle different use cases without requiring additional tools.
The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.
The product manages workloads efficiently, allowing our operators to learn and operate it quickly, which underscores its value to our business.
It has significantly reduced the time required for tasks that were previously manual, such as running batch and online jobs and report submissions.
Automic Automation has helped reduce workload failure rates by fifty percent.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
Their current support level is really good.
Technical support is managed by third parties now, which complicates direct customer assistance from Broadcom.
They react quickly when it is urgent.
They are highly knowledgeable in their product area and very easy to work with.
If you put the tickets in for which you need help right away, they get back to you right away.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
We have small clients running a thousand tasks per day and big enterprises running one million or two million tasks per day.
The solution effectively supports our existing user base and is equipped to scale further.
It does not perform real-time scalability in our environment, but because of the way we have built it, it can scale well past any thresholds with no issues.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
We have not faced any real issues, and it’s the main reason why we haven't enabled a lot of the redundancy features.
The stability of the solution is excellent.
In a well-tuned environment, it runs very smoothly.
So far, I have not encountered any issues related to instability such as lagging, crashing, or downtime.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
AppWorx Workload Automation does not support mainframe environments.
Licensing fees have increased as they charge based on executions rather than user agents, causing higher costs.
It does not work as well for activities that require real-time input/output, but it works very well for batch, ETL, or similar cases.
Pricing is a major issue for some clients due to changes in Broadcom's pricing model, causing some to seek alternative solutions.
A feature that provides a dependency chart or tree diagram would be very helpful.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
Licensing now depends on execution counts as opposed to agent counts, leading to increased costs.
The licensing is fair and reasonable for what the product offers.
Broadcom decided to change the way of licensing by moving to the number of jobs runs and then they say that clients have to pay three million because they run one million jobs per day.
Due to the increased pricing, some of them are thinking of reducing tasks in Automic to have fewer executions.
The pricing has been increasing significantly over the years, raising operational costs instead of reducing them.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
AppWorx Workload Automation's simplicity and powerful functionality are its most valuable features for us.
Atomic Applications Manager is user-friendly and accommodates around 100 users who can monitor and run their jobs effectively.
A standout feature is the comprehensive versioning, allowing easy rollback to previous states.
Designing workflows is made easier by the graphical user interface, simplifying complex tasks.
It supports high availability by operating multiple servers concurrently, which means users do not experience outages or the need to log in again, even if some servers are updated.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Automic Automation | 6.8% |
| JAMS | 2.6% |
| AppWorx Workload Automation | 1.8% |
| Other | 88.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 67 |
JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.
Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.
What are JAMS's key features?In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.
AppWorx Workload Automation automates your Ellucian’s Banner or Fiserv DNA processing. This innovative, best-in-class task scheduling solution accelerates your processing, provides visibility and control over business processes, and mitigates risk in both environments.
AppWorx Workload Automation Can:
Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Ellucian’s Banner
Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Fiserv DNA Processing
Reviews from Real Users
“The most valuable feature for me is the scheduling,” says an enterprise application architect at a retailer who has been using the solution for close to 10 years.
A manager at a tech services company adds that “The interface is good. The compliance-related features are very good.”
Automic Automation offers a web-based GUI for high scalability and flexibility, integrating with platforms like SAP and Oracle. It promotes efficient process automation and supports multiple OS environments, benefiting diverse industries with its robust predictive capabilities.
Automic Automation facilitates process automation and workload management, providing valuable integration with applications like SAP and Oracle. It supports a wide range of operating systems and environments, enabling seamless workflow automation. It features a web-based interface accessible across devices, ensuring scalability and flexibility for complex job automation. Users find its predictive capabilities and platform support instrumental in enhancing operations, although improvements are noted in reporting, cloud integration, and documentation. Licensing and pricing structures also present room for optimization, along with workflow dependency management and smoother upgrade paths.
What are the key features of Automic Automation?
What benefits and ROI should users expect from Automic Automation?
Automic Automation sees implementation in industries like banking, finance, and telecommunications, where it automates ERP systems, schedules batch jobs, integrates workloads, and manages file transfers. By supporting SAP, Oracle, and ETL tasks, it aids efficiency and workload automation across varied environments including cloud and mainframe systems.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
