Arcserve UDP vs IBM Tivoli CDP for Files comparison

"It is easy to configure."

"It is overall rock-solid."

"The product provides instant and virtual standbys."

"The solution has no limitations because it does backup for Linux and Windows."

"The most valuable feature is the duplication."

"The ability to switch between different hardware platforms and utilization tools are some of this solution's most valuable features."

"Easy restoration and the solution works quickly."

"The most valuable features of this solution are that I can by just one click, copy and paste anything that I would want. I do not have to restore the whole virtual machine."

"The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."

"Even though a lot of other people like Veeam, Tivoli's restoration and infrastructure are unbeatable, making them the only ones that we rely on despite other feasible options."

"In the most recent version of premium plus the replication has been removed, and it should re-added to the solution."

"The initial setup was complex, but with the help of our IT and engineering staff, it was quite straightforward."

"The only problem with the solution is that when I change the drive capacity, it has to do a full backup."

"I think that the price could still be a bit cheaper and I do not like that they have been purchased by Arcserve."

"The solution can use a lot of bandwidth when the scheduling is not done, it should auto-schedule itself. For example, if there are 50 users connected in the network at 12 o'clock and the backup is not scheduled. At this time the network offices are going to have performance issues when it is doing a backup. Having a feature to auto-schedule a time when the network is not being used often would be beneficial."

"The support could be more knowledgeable and faster."

"The high use of RAM memory is a headache for those who want to implement the system with all the resources in use."

"StorageCraft ShadowProtect can improve by making one console that can control backups of all desktops and servers in one place. Additionally, the recovery process of the backups is very slow and could improve. It's very slow when we went to recover a complete disc but to recover one file is very fast."

"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."

"We rarely need to reach out to customer service; however, when we do, they have not been able to help us resolve a single call."

"The solution is not very expensive, but it is not cheap."

"The licensing cost is for one year. There are not any hidden costs involved in the pricing model of the solution."

"I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization."

"The solution is expensive."

"Its price seems reasonable. Its price is average as compared to the other products I've looked at. We have a three-year license right now. There are no other costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"There are annual subscription fees and there are licensing costs for three computers. It is an expensive solution."

"The retail fee is $1300 for a year for one server. Other than that, there is just the cost of your hardware."

"Pricing is most likely comparable."

"It's expensive, but it's worth for it due to the volume of critical information within our database. We are currently paying about $22,000 per year."