Arcserve UDP vs IBM Tivoli CDP for Files comparison

"The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too."

"The recovery part of the product is very good."

"Arcserve has a feature called virtual standby (VSB), which has been very helpful because I already have a hot standby copy of my critical infrastructure. If something breaks, I can spin up that virtual standby copy in less than five minutes and ensure that my data is available to everyone and that business continuity is maintained."

"I like the tool's speed."

"The most valuable feature of Arcserve UDP is the initiative UI and the logs are clear and detailed that are generated when there has been an issue or failure on the user's system. We only have to log onto the client's system to retrieve the information. It is possible to precisely identify the problem's location. The system categorizes and logs every step in a structured manner, selectively displaying only the essential logs. However, to view a comprehensive log, one must access the line machine log and examine the actual client for detailed logging."

"It is easy to configure."

"The product provides instant and virtual standbys."

"The backup is the most valuable feature. It also makes storage very easy."

"The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."

"I think that the price could still be a bit cheaper and I do not like that they have been purchased by Arcserve."

"The tool doesn't provide cloud integration in India."

"Backups are very slow and time consuming."

"In the most recent version of premium plus the replication has been removed, and it should re-added to the solution."

"Arcserve UDP is in the middle range of complexity. The interface can be developed a little bit more to be user-friendly."

"It takes much time to verify and consolidate images for backups."

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. It can be difficult to assign destinations and choose which files and folders we need to back up. There are some aspects that are unclear."

"The solution can improve by allowing older versions to support the latest version of the OS."

"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."

"Pricing is most likely comparable."

"It is approximately $400 to purchase a virtual service outright."

"Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The solution is priced well compared to other solutions."

"The retail fee is $1300 for a year for one server. Other than that, there is just the cost of your hardware."

"The solution is expensive."

"There is an annual license required for this solution and it is priced well."

"It's expensive, but it's worth for it due to the volume of critical information within our database. We are currently paying about $22,000 per year."