Aruba Instant vs WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4, while WatchGuard is ranked #24 with an average rating of 6.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 2.1% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to WatchGuard’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

Aruba Instant

Read 50 Aruba Instant reviews

3,040 Views
2,366 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi

Read 7 WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi reviews

564 Views
482 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Aruba Instant

WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Aruba Instant and WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi are contenders in the wireless networking sector. WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi takes the lead thanks to its comprehensive security features, even though Aruba Instant is more attractive in terms of pricing.

Features: Aruba Instant provides seamless scalability, intuitive management through a centralized platform, and advanced AI-driven security capabilities. It is well-suited for small to medium businesses seeking efficient network management. WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi delivers superior security with advanced threat detection, robust cloud-managed controls, and exceptional features catering to enterprises focused on security.

Room for Improvement: Aruba Instant could enhance its feature set to match enterprise-grade security expectations and improve customization options for large deployments. WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi could simplify its initial deployment process, refine user interface for ease of use, and enhance integration with third-party tools for broader application.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba Instant offers hassle-free setup and prompt customer support, allowing businesses to quickly adapt. However, WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi, despite being slightly more complex to deploy, offers extensive documentation and training resources that support its feature-rich environment.

Pricing and ROI: Aruba Instant stands out with competitive setup costs and promising ROI due to its cost-effective structure. WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi requires a higher initial investment but is justified by long-term reliability and enhanced security features, appealing to security-focused businesses that seek higher value ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant vs. WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant vs. WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant

Ranking in Wireless LAN

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant is 2.1%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Prashant-Patel

Senior Presales Consultant - Networking Solutions at Mannai

A highly stable and easy-to-deploy solution that is free and provides excellent deployment guides

The setup is very straightforward. There is no complexity at all. It took us 15 minutes. We need IP address details, DNS, a gateway, DHCP servers, and SSIDs. Single access points can act as controller-based, controller-less, and cloud-based solutions. That is the beauty of Aruba. If I have an on-premise solution and want to move to the cloud, I don't need separate hardware. The same hardware can be utilized in the cloud. The deployment guides that we get from Aruba are excellent. We have every piece of detail.

Read full review

WarrenWilliams

Senior Account Manager at Bralin Technology Solutions

A solution that offers excellent support and makes it easy to manage networks

To utilize the solution properly, you need some training and guidance on that. Getting it working is easy, but if you're going to use it with feature sets that make WatchGuard worthwhile to use, it's probably not the easiest to set up. I'd rate the initial setup a seven out of ten. The time taken to deploy the solution depends on the project scope you're doing. Do you need ten WiFi access points or one? You could deploy the solution in an hour. We need one person to deploy the solution. But the number of people required for deployment depends on where the access points are deployed. Like, if it's the ceiling or whatever. The way we do it, we usually have an on-site technician who sets up the backend. We usually have two people when deploying the solution, but you can do it with one person. We have a team that manages the solution. But if you have ten people on a site to manage the solution, 15 minutes daily is enough.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a good solution for small businesses because it's easy to figure out. It's simple to set Aruba up in any configuration, like link aggregation or static loads. It's suitable for less complicated configurations, whereas Cisco devices are bigger and more difficult to implement."

"In terms of stability, Aruba Instant is the best on the market."

"You don't have to deal with licenses."

"Has many advanced features: Built-in firewall, local radius, application visibility and control, not locked into support agreements."

"The coverage of the solution is great."

"The most valuable feature of Aruba Instant is its cloud capability, which allows us to manage it through the cloud."

"Works automatically in terms of setup with the product finding its master wifi access point."

"It is easy to use, manage, and implement."

More Aruba Instant pros

"The configuration part of WatchGuard is very flexible."

"It makes it easy to obtain all information about the client experience."

"They're very easy to set up and get running."

"The solution has been stable."

"The Wi-Fi security features of this solution have been great for our customers who need to strictly control access to their network."

"We like that WatchGuard works and integrates directly with the firewalls we use."

"Cloud analytics that provide all its attributes."

Cons

"Aruba Instant does not currently offer a multi-gig switch or product, making it an area that requires improvement. Aruba Instant's competitors have multi-gig switches or products."

"In a corporate environment or a larger network, where more advanced filtering or MAC-based filtering is needed, I don't think the IAPs would be sufficient."

"Embedding a heatmap tool within the product would make it easier to conduct a wireless survey."

"The tool's support quality has changed since HPE acquired it. It is also impossible to tell the log dates."

"The only issue we've had is getting equipment supplies. The availability of the APs that I want to use has been an issue. It took almost two months to get them the first time. I've ordered a few more for another client, and they're still on back order. It has been over a month now."

"Aruba Instant's visibility, firewalling, L3 functionality, and DHCP services could all be improved."

"It is not powerful enough and lacks features recommended for larger dimensions, making it unsuitable for big companies with requirements like 100 access points."

"There was only ever one case in which an access point failed, but it was reintegrated. The issue was more of a matter of oversight. One part of the network had covered ten access points."

More Aruba Instant cons

"Inability to import a user with one click."

"The support response can be time-consuming because sometimes issues are very sensitive and require instant attention."

"If a client device had issues with authentication due to out of date browser or similar difficulties, it would be nice to have the ability to migrate the client onto the portal via one click."

"The solution can be scaled but it has limitations from my experience."

"I don't think they're available at the best price."

"One of the things is if you buy it with a certain subscription, you can't easily change the subscription level."

"The price of this solution needs to reviewed, as it is currently high enough to deter customers from trying it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not expensive. Its price is fair. You get many features with the normal licensing. If I look at Cisco, it is very expensive if I need similar things."

"The customers do not have to pay for licensing."

"In terms of costs, Aruba Instant is cheap because it doesn't require a license, but you'll incur charges for the access points. Access point charges could be more affordable."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The licensing cost is somewhere around $20,000."

"There’s no licensing required to use the tool."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

More Aruba Instant pricing and cost advice

"WatchGuard is on the upper scale for pricing."

"Your licensing and cost, as would be required for many other solutions, being considered for eighty to two hundred and eighty different physical locations, is just about the same amount per access point."

"The solution is priced high compared to competitors. However, for the features that are included in the solution, the price becomes more reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

10%

Comms Service Provider

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Ubiquiti WLAN or Aruba Instant?

We researched Ubiquiti and Aruba when looking for a WLAN solution. Ubiquiti offers good WLAN access both indoors and outdoors. It provides an enterprise-level WIFI while remaining cost-effective. U...

See all answers

What do you like most about Aruba Instant?

I find network management features related to monitoring Wi-Fi usage and visited sites particularly valuable. Content filtering is also important to prevent access to malicious or inappropriate web...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant?

The licensing costs depend on the product. The smaller switch is around one hundred and twenty euros. We do not sell very expensive devices as we move to other products.

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi?

We like that WatchGuard works and integrates directly with the firewalls we use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi?

WatchGuard is on the upper scale for pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi?

One of the things is if you buy it with a certain subscription, you can't easily change the subscription level. For example, if you bought it with the Total Secure package, it's not easy to downgra...

See all answers

Comparisons

Omada Access Points vs Aruba Instant

Compared 38% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Aruba Instant

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant

Compared 13% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Aruba Instant

Compared 10% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Aruba Instant

Compared 2% of the time

More Aruba Instant Competitors

Ubiquiti WLAN vs WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi

Compared 32% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi

Compared 31% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi

Compared 26% of the time

More WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant

February 2025

Download Aruba Instant product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi

February 2025

Download WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi product report

Overview

Aruba Instant delivers the only controllerless Wi-Fi solution that is easy to set-up, and loaded with security and smarts needed to accelerate your business without breaking your budget.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

WatchGuard is a global leader in network security, secure Wi-Fi, and network intelligence products and services for SMBs and Distributed Enterprises worldwide. Our mission is to make enterprise-grade security accessible to companies of all types and sizes through simplicity, making WatchGuard an ideal solution for distributed enterprises and SMBs. WatchGuard is headquartered in Seattle, Washington, with offices throughout North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Latin America.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Purdue University, Orlando Magic, Brussels Airport Company, Molecaten Holiday Parks

Portsmouth Grammar School, HILOTEC

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant vs. WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi

January 2025

Free Report: Aruba Instant vs. WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant vs. WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Instant vs. WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.