Ataccama ONE Platform vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection comparison

Ataccama and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Ataccama is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Ataccama holds a 2.4% mindshare in DG, compared to Microsoft’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 6 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

1,296 Views
852 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Read 12 Microsoft Purview Information Protection reviews

1,125 Views
803 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Ataccama ONE Platform and Microsoft Purview Information Protection are competing in data management and security. Microsoft Purview Information Protection appears to have an advantage with its advanced security features and compliance capabilities, while Ataccama ONE Platform is more economical and supportive.

Features: Ataccama ONE Platform offers robust data management with data profiling, cleansing, and governance tools. Its user console and workflow structure are designed for streamlined governance and efficiency. Microsoft Purview Information Protection excels with sophisticated security capabilities, implementing data protection across multi-cloud environments, including native compliance features and extensive encryption options.

Room for Improvement: Ataccama ONE Platform could enhance its native data protection and compliance attributes for better alignment with enterprise-level security needs. Its integration options with other data management systems need expansion. Microsoft Purview Information Protection could improve its complexity during deployment and expand its functionality to efficiently support on-premises systems like NAS or SAN storage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ataccama ONE Platform is recognized for its straightforward deployment and outstanding customer support, offering a user-friendly experience. Microsoft Purview Information Protection provides comprehensive integration possibilities but may face challenges due to its intricate deployment process, requiring more specialized knowledge to handle effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Ataccama ONE Platform is valued for offering competitive pricing with a compelling return on investment, emphasizing functionality per cost. In contrast, Microsoft Purview Information Protection is more expensive but offers high returns in terms of data protection features justifying the investment, particularly for organizations prioritizing robust security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (5th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (4th)

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Ranking in Data Governance

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Privacy Management Software (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.4%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is 2.5%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

Heidi Hasting

Mgr Data Engineering at Avanade

Provides an essential audit trail that helps prevent accidental exposure of sensitive data, but the changing product names are confusing

One of the key features of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is the auto-classification functionalities, although I have found them to be less effective in complex scenarios. The policy toggle, demanding justification for downgrading labels, provides an essential audit trail that helps prevent accidental exposure of sensitive data. The security tools integrate well. I like that you can scan several data or informational assets, such as your SharePoint list, Teams, etc., and bring them into Purview as a central repository. Partnering with other products, like Sentinel, for logging capability and inventory provides a service across the board. It's essential that Purview automatically prevents highly sensitive corporate secrets and data from being ingested into generative AI models, but the reality is that AI is a tool. It's problematic if consumers rely on a tool to protect them because they must be educated first. Regardless of the education, the employee might share the information anyway, so the AI shouldn't be the first point of failure. It should be a human making good decisions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"Purview saves customers time by offering them a quick way to assess a situation and insights into how to improve."

"I created training materials for end users on applying different labels, explaining their purposes, and providing examples. This was crucial since end users would apply the labels in different protection scenarios. The implementation helped the organization in several ways."

"The features my clients request most are sensitivity labels and data loss prevention. Additionally, I am trying to interest them in risk management and insider risk management, although those features are considered more advanced."

"I recommend Microsoft Purview Information Protection for organizations using the Microsoft ecosystem."

"Incorporating data loss prevention capabilities built into the Microsoft platform to endpoints, such as Windows 10 and Windows 11 computers, can also help prevent data loss and is highly advantageous."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is its ability to respond to sensitive data shared on Teams chat by deleting the message, not just monitoring or logging."

"Before using it, we had a lot of unlabeled data, and the tool helped us quickly and accurately label a large number of documents."

"We can restrict access or specify who can see sensitivity labels, which can be based on the classification level. We can encrypt restricted content and limit who can see that from an internal view, too, so Purview is a powerful tool."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection pros

Cons

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"Data movement is a pain."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"Microsoft Purview Information Protection can improve in terms of scan concurrency and scan processing time."

"Microsoft customer service is hit or miss. Sometimes, I get a fast and knowledgeable response, while other times, I've experienced delays and received no resolution."

"Scalability is affected by the time it takes to update policies."

"I would like the time it takes to update a DLP policy on an endpoint to be reduced."

"My experience with the customer service and support of Microsoft is around five out of ten. The response time is slow, and they take multiple sessions for diagnosing issues."

"I rate Microsoft support six out of 10. Response times are a challenge. It's hard to be an ambassador for a product when you know it will be hard to get support."

"There is room for improvement with the policy tips feature."

"Purview could better integrate with third-party tools, but I don't have a specific use case for that because It's currently integrated into the managed services we offer to Microsoft customers using E5 licenses."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The tool's pricing is fairly low, less than 100,000 for a year."

"The product is affordable, and our clients agree. Sensitivity labels come with the MIP license at an additional $2 a month per user, an excellent deal for auto-labeling capabilities."

"Initially, Purview's cost seemed quite high because it was for personal use. I was scanning a tiny tenant and thinking, "If I extrapolate this to an enterprise-scale tenant, it will be quite costly." However, I talked to people who had compared it to other products on the market, and they're spending five figures to get started. At least, Purview has a free trial, so you can try some of the features early on."

"The pricing and setup costs are transferred to my clients, who find it affordable and are satisfied with what they receive."

"The tool's pricing is not a problem for customers because they often purchase it as part of a bundle. With an E5 license, for example, users get access to the entire functionality. This is one of the main reasons why many customers are choosing Microsoft."

"The price is determined by the enterprise licensing, either the E3 or E5 licensing or the EMS plus security and other feature licensing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

It ensures that sensitive data is automatically safeguarded, even for email attachments, regardless of the user or device.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

The pricing is not very high and is considered fine. Microsoft offers different licensing options. AIP Plan 2 is used for critical users. The AIP is included in the business standard license for cl...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

The most difficult part in the labeling solution is the lack of direct PDF support on Macs, whereas on Windows, a Purview agent can label PDFs. This should be improved to support PDF protection on ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 20% of the time

BigID vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

April 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Information Protection

March 2025

Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Download Microsoft Purview Information Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Information Protection

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform is a comprehensive data management and governance solution designed to address the challenges faced by organizations in managing and leveraging their data assets. Its primary use case is to enable organizations to gain control over their data, improve data quality, and ensure compliance with data regulations.

The most valuable functionality of Ataccama ONE includes data profiling, data quality management, data integration, master data management, and metadata management. These features allow organizations to understand the quality and structure of their data, integrate data from various sources, create a single view of their master data, and manage metadata to ensure data lineage and governance.

By leveraging Ataccama ONE, organizations can achieve several benefits. Firstly, it helps in improving data quality by identifying and resolving data issues, ensuring accurate and reliable data for decision-making. Secondly, it enables organizations to streamline data integration processes, reducing the time and effort required for data integration projects. Thirdly, it facilitates effective master data management, enabling organizations to have a consistent and accurate view of their critical data entities. Lastly, it helps organizations in complying with data regulations by providing data lineage, data privacy, and data governance capabilities.

Ataccama

Implement Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) to help you discover, classify, and protect sensitive information wherever it lives or travels.

MIP capabilities are included with Microsoft 365 Compliance and give you the tools to know your data, protect your data, and prevent data loss.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

March 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.