Microsoft Purview Data Governance and Microsoft Purview Information Protection compete in the data management and protection category. Microsoft Purview Information Protection holds an advantage due to its advanced security features and perceived higher value.
Features: Microsoft Purview Data Governance includes data cataloging, lineage tracking, and insight generation, mapping data locations and movements. In contrast, Microsoft Purview Information Protection offers data classification, encryption, and labeling capabilities, excelling in securing sensitive data.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Purview Data Governance could enhance automated data classification, improve support for non-Microsoft data sources, and refine its user interface for easier navigation. For Microsoft Purview Information Protection, improvements may include faster deployment processes, broader support for legacy systems, and increased flexibility in customization settings.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview Data Governance offers streamlined deployment with strong integration into the Microsoft ecosystem and responsive customer support. Microsoft Purview Information Protection, despite a more complex setup due to advanced security features, provides robust support, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing data protection.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview Data Governance features competitive pricing with a strong ROI, focusing on data management effectiveness. Microsoft Purview Information Protection, with a higher initial cost, justifies the investment through enhanced data protection, making it a strategic choice for security-focused enterprises.
Clients benefit from using a one-stop-shop solution, increasing their visibility across different platforms.
Purview can do a quick scan, and it doesn't use human resources, so it gets time to do things that we need humans to focus on.
The cost of data loss and your data going to a competitor is potentially massive.
Customers have seen a return on investment through quicker issue detection and cost savings due to automation.
Overall, it doesn't meet our expectations.
They're skillful people who know what they're doing in their space.
The support could be better, particularly with consulting.
Sometimes, I get a fast and knowledgeable response, while other times, I've experienced delays and received no resolution.
It's hard to be an ambassador for a product when you know it will be hard to get support.
We generally receive good support from Microsoft for this solution.
With automation, you can label five documents or 50,000 with the same amount of clicks.
The product is scalable and works across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments.
It can be scaled across different departments organization-wide very quickly and easily.
It can handle large collections of data without issues.
It can take seven days to 24 hours to determine whether a policy is effective.
Once implemented, I haven't had issues with its consistency.
It's essential to know if a feature isn't working due to missing licenses.
There are some problems with DLP rules, and it would be great if the security around DLP could be expanded.
A watermark feature or similar tools to help enhance security for end users could be added.
Having a roadmap or updates about new releases would be helpful for demonstrating to clients.
Clarifying product features and use cases would help avoid such confusion.
Purview could better integrate with third-party tools.
The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion.
The experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing was smooth, as most Purview functionalities were included in the e5 licenses we migrated to for other reasons.
I talked to people who had compared it to other products on the market, and they're spending five figures to get started.
Our focus is on helping customers maximize their software investment.
It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time.
The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization.
The feature that I find most valuable is its ability to block unintended data sharing, like forcing unencrypted emails to be encrypted.
Microsoft Copilot is an advantage because it's enterprise-grade AI.
It's paramount to have a single solution for information protection.
Regardless of the education, the employee might share the information anyway, so the AI shouldn't be the first point of failure. It should be a human making good decisions.
The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.
Implement Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) to help you discover, classify, and protect sensitive information wherever it lives or travels.
MIP capabilities are included with Microsoft 365 Compliance and give you the tools to know your data, protect your data, and prevent data loss.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.