Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Atlassian Crowd vs Auth0 Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian Crowd
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
26th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Auth0 Platform
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Access Management (5th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), AI IT Support (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Atlassian Crowd is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Auth0 Platform is 6.6%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Auth0 Platform6.6%
Atlassian Crowd1.2%
Other92.2%
Single Sign-On (SSO)
 

Featured Reviews

Grigoriy Kneller - PeerSpot reviewer
General Manager at HDI Systeme AG
Enhanced user management offering seamless single sign-on, scalability for large enterprises, and improved configurability through integration with various user sources and directories
For organizations using various Atlassian products and dealing with multiple user sources or directories, implementing Atlassian Crowd for single sign-on proves highly beneficial. This is especially true for companies that have instances of Atlassian product installations across different entities, each with its own Active Directory and user directory. Crowd significantly streamlines user and directory management, making it more efficient for larger enterprises. It is particularly advisable and recommended for big companies, especially those that have undergone acquisitions or mergers, as it enhances user management, transparency, and configurability. While it's incredibly useful for enterprise-level businesses, it may also be suitable for mid-sized companies with a substantial user base. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.
Piyush Tripathi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at Concentrix Catalyst
Unified identity platform has reduced dev time and secures multi-tenant cloud microservices
I noticed some enhancement challenges. Sometimes when I logged in, there was a thirty-day time period to log in again, but recently after restarting my system, that thirty-day period is not working. I need to provide the token after login again, which is for the security part. For development accounts used by others, every time we need to use those tokens to connect to that site. UI improvements can also be made, particularly on the homepage, where tiles could be displayed. It would help if there were separate left bar tiles for the login section so anyone could edit their login page directly. Everything is working very well. However, when integrating, I need to give permissions and manage many things manually when creating users with multi-tenancy. For instance, I first create the connection, then the organization, enable the connection at the application level, allow some permissions, and create the default user. Improvements could be made so that when someone creates an organization, a default user is available from Auth0 Platform to log in, and they could use those credentials to create further users. This is also dependent on functionality and user requirements. For my use case, that was lacking. The initial setup was somewhat complex. Since I was doing it for the first time, I needed to create an application, allow permissions, integrate it, and set redirect variables and URLs for logout. Although documentation is available, it does not specify the exact format for multiple logout URLs or multi-tenant URLs. Sometimes I had to try different methods until it worked. Improvements in documentation are needed for first-time setups. When connecting with Auth0 Platform, if there is a failure or error, I do not receive a specific message to identify if it is a bug or another type of issue. I suggest having clearer error messages, such as indicating what is missing or providing expected formatting for values.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are predominantly in the directory and development spaces."
"One standout feature is the capability to configure various authentication and authorization methods from diverse user directories."
"I simply use the JWT from the client on the server side to process requests and push updated profile data to a database/queue as needed and end the process without having to persist data in the web server (sessions)."
"The specific outcomes since I started using Auth0 include time-saving, more security, and scalability, which are the three things I would emphasize."
"The most valuable feature of the product is scalability."
"The most important feature for me was the ease of use, as it needed to be easy to integrate into my platform."
"Auth0 has the best support ever."
"It's a very powerful platform. It has the ability to do the usual stuff, according to modern protocols, like OIDC and OAuth 2. But the real benefit of using the platform comes from its flexibility to enhance it with rules and, now, with what they call authentication pipelines. That is the most significant feature, as it allows you to customize everything regarding the authentication and authorization process."
"The best features of Auth0 Platform are that it is easy to integrate and is cross-platform, as we use it with the Angular front end, the UWP application, and the iOS application, and it is really easy to integrate within the dashboard without any complications."
"The most important feature for me was the ease of use, as it needed to be easy to integrate into my platform."
 

Cons

"It makes you more efficient, but you have to optimize what you're doing before you get into the software."
"There's a need for effective group membership management, especially for corporate programs."
"Scalability is quite vast, but it does lead to higher pricing as usage increases."
"The initial setup was somewhat complex. Although documentation is available, it does not specify the exact format for multiple logout URLs or multi-tenant URLs, so sometimes I had to try different methods until it worked."
"If you’re not a developer, you need to spend time exploring more."
"The Management API could be improved so it's easier to get user information."
"I find it surprising that there is no access to a standard user profile."
"There could be easy integration with IoT devices for the product."
"The tool's price should be improved."
"I find it surprising that there is no access to a standard user profile."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's pretty cheap. I would rate the price as three out of five."
"While it may seem affordable for larger enterprises, it tends to become more expensive as you move up the scale."
"It is a relatively inexpensive product in the industry."
"There are different price levels: B2B, B2C, and enterprise. The basic plan is about $1,500 per month."
"The tool is cheaper compared to competing solutions. Those alternatives tended to be more expensive. Consequently, Okta purchased it because it was considerably cheaper. The solution even offered some free services while still providing excellent functionality."
"I am pretty happy with the pricing model of Auth0. It is very clear for me. Considering our scale, the features that we are using, and additional features that we bought, we still find it great. If you split the costs for the whole year and calculate the number of people you needed to hire, it always comes out to be much lesser than what we would have spent on building our own solution."
"Pricing of Auth0 is a pain point. Their pricing model is very confusing, at least for an enterprise. I don't like their pricing model. I think it's too aggressive. It's not very cheap for a service that only does authentication."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
884,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Auth0?
It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auth0?
Auth0 Platform is quite affordable compared to IBM Security Access Verify, which is on the higher end. ForgeRock and Okta are in the same bucket for pricing.
What needs improvement with Auth0?
Auth0 Platform is not as flexible compared to ForgeRock or IBM Security Access Manager. Auth0 Platform will only play on the outer boundary of the application. Once the application team requests to...
 

Also Known As

Crowd
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NHL, Interspire, Appfire
1. Airbnb 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. Atlassian 5. Audi 6. Baidu 7. BlackRock 8. Cisco 9. CocaCola 10. Dell 11. eBay 12. FedEx 13. Fiat Chrysler 14. Ford 15. Google 16. Groupon 17. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 18. IBM 19. Intel 20. LinkedIn 21. Mastercard 22. Mercedes Benz23. Microsoft 24. Nike 25. Oracle 26. PayPal 27. Pinterest 28. Qualcomm 29. SAP 30. Spotify 31. Tesla 32. Toyota
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian Crowd vs. Auth0 Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,192 professionals have used our research since 2012.