Automox vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection comparison

Automox and Xcitium are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Automox is ranked #61, while Xcitium is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.3. Automox holds a 0.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to Xcitium’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Xcitium users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 10 Automox reviews

529 Views
392 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Read 16 Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection reviews

1,125 Views
666 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Automox

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and Automox compete in endpoint protection. Automox appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features.

Features: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection: comprehensive malware detection, auto-containment, device control. Automox: cross-platform support, automated patching, intuitive management tools.

Room for Improvement: Comodo: reporting capabilities, reduction in false positives, more intuitive user interface. Automox: enhanced patching analytics, faster remediation times, improved integration with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is known for its straightforward setup and responsive support. Automox is also praised for quick deployment and helpful support staff.

Pricing and ROI: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is noted for its cost-effectiveness and good ROI. Automox, despite higher pricing, is considered worth the investment for its richer feature set and efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

61st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (50th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (18th), Patch Management (17th)

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

40th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Automox is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Jack Leung

EMEA Senior Systems Engineer at Quaker Chemical Corporation

Easy to use and deploy agents but needs more stability

We just need to deploy the agent to the endpoints. We don't need to set up anything. For a single agent, it takes one or two minutes. However, we deployed globally, and you need to take into consideration the time it will take to deploy across each endpoint. It's very simple to deploy. We had three or four engineers take care of the implementation.

Read full review

CHATHURANGA-JAYAWEEEA

Product Security at Plexus Global (Pvt) Ltd

Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection

I also have experience with Sophos and Kaspersky. The main difference is that some features are not available in Kaspersky. And, for example, the patch management part is not included in Sophos. On the Kaspersky side, they have a patch management part. However, we need to purchase an additional option to enable that feature. With Comodo Protection, patch management is already included with the product, and we don't need to buy it separately. Also, the main advantage is performance. When we implemented Sophos on the endpoint, the CPU utilization went higher. When we installed Comodo, the memory of the CPU utilization is very low. We can implement Comodo from XP and SP3 to the latest operating system. However, with Kaspersky or Sophos, they are not supported for that or Windows 10. Comodo is supporting Windows XP SP3 and all our operating systems. That said, the Sophos Intercept X Advanced option has a web filtering part, or integration. Comodo has only basic filtering, and web filtering is there. That means we can do the URL web addresses and block and allow the connection and that's it with Comodo. Comodo does have a separate product for that, Comodo Secure Internet, where we can configure and filter all the web filtering parts. That would be an extra solution at an extra cost.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They've been adding some new features lately, which I'm not nearly as familiar with, but the ability to just deploy patches and exempt certain machines from certain patches is helpful. For instance, for our servers, we may not want to roll out zero-day patches. We are able to exempt those and make sure that they don't get those policies. We've got certain servers that have to run a particular version of Java, and being able to exempt those servers from receiving Java updates is pretty fantastic."

"The flexibility in creating tools to make changes on remote machines is most valuable to me. The reporting feature is also fantastic because on any given day I can bring up a list of machines that don't have patches, for example. Or I can bring up a list of machines that are in my environment on a certain day. The solution helps me with not only my own role, and what I look for internally myself, but it also helps during audits. I can go in and look at the number of machines in there, and their owners and timelines. It certainly helps tell a story for anything that IT requires."

"The fact that it's just one product that can patch multiple operating systems is really great."

"Coming from prior solutions that were a lot more effort, Automox's patch management abilities are transformational. When I took over patching at my company, they were using on-premise architecture to patch. As the workforce shifted from being in the office into their home offices, I was able to lift and shift with no effort other than deploying the new agent out into the environment."

"The biggest improvement to our organization involves the reduction in its man hours... We've probably saved hundreds of hours."

"Among the most valuable features are its ease of use and the Worklets. Both of them are time-savers. Worklets enable us to customize things for a given environment. It's something like when Apple lets other people create applications. Other peoples' Worklets can be used in our environment and in our customers' environments. That saves a lot of time, and it's really cool."

"It's super easy to use and we haven't found anything easier."

"It's easy to deploy agents to endpoints."

More Automox pros

"The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."

"It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful."

"The product’s valuable feature is the remote control station."

"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."

"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection allows our organization's clients to be managed and inventoried remotely."

"Containment is the best feature of the solution."

"Overall, I would rate Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection a nine out of ten."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"There should be better inventory capabilities. Right now, they only allow you to have insight into software out-of-the-box. It would be nice to also extend that into custom inventory that can be modified and managed by the practitioner."

"We would like to see additional detailed reporting for Service providers like us. We had to build our own reports via their APIs to meet our needs."

"It should have integrated workstation access. So, there should be a remote desktop feature."

"As concerns the patching concepts, there's a bit of a learning curve in terms of working out how Automox wants you to work within the console, not only splitting up everything into groups, but then having the various policies assigned."

"The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository. Currently, all updates are provided directly from the internet. So, if you have 1,000 devices, all 1,000 devices go directly out to the internet. We would love the option of being able to put the updates on local storage so that we're not consuming as much bandwidth. That is literally the only thing that we've ever wanted."

"They need to improve the automation features."

"Asset management would be a great feature to add to Automox. We would run easier scripts or more out of the box scripts that would help us in audits. \"

"When we bring on a new client, we need to go into that client and manually set up my account, my chief engineer's account, three technicians' accounts, and a billing person's account all over again, which is annoying. We have probably up to 15 or 16 of our clients on Automox now. For every single one of those, we have had to go in and set this up. Then, if anything changes, we have to remember to go to Automox and change it 15 or 16 times. So, we just want inheritable permissions, and that is it. We have talked to them about this, and they are like, "Yeah, we hear a lot of complaints about it." I am thinking, "Guys, I have been complaining about this for a year and a half. When are you going to do it?" It must be some tricky thing or not an easy fix, because I can only assume if it were easy, then they would have done it by now."

More Automox cons

"They need to just modernize the infrastructure with something that is next-generation. We have recently moved to SentinelOne. It had been doing good for us for a while, but we needed something modern with new technology."

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows."

"The quality of the analysis and the product dashboard is a bit low compared to other providers."

"The licensing fees are high. The company should work to try to lower them for the customer."

"The product must provide a web filter to block websites based on specific categories."

"There are a few minor issues such as package updates and passwords."

"We'd like the solution to include advanced web filtering capabilities, similar to what Sophos offers."

"The downside of the product stems from the fact that it is still an unknown product in the market. Comodo needs to invest more in advertisements and promotions."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is a great value."

"There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased."

"We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use."

"We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee."

"The cost is very reasonable compared to the competition."

"For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing.""

"The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."

"Its licensing for a year was nine grand. There was no additional fee."

More Automox pricing and cost advice

"The price of this product should be lower."

"I rate Comodo’s pricing a four out of ten."

"The product is pricey."

"Generally, the cost is between $16 and $19 per endpoint."

"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The product can be considered fairly cheap."

"The tool's pricing is not very expensive and falls within the market price. The solution's licensing is on a yearly basis."

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is inexpensive."

"It's a cost-effective solution"

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automox?

It's easy to deploy agents to endpoints.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automox?

We do pay a monthly licensing fee. I'd rate the pricing as average. It's not cheap yet not too expensive. You can also pay for more support if you require them to provide consultancy services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automox?

They need to improve the automation features. It could be more stable.

See all answers

What do you like most about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Auto Containment is a valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows. There is also room for improvement in ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 22% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 19% of the time

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 9% of the time

BigFix vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

More Automox Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 24% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

April 2025

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

April 2025

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection report

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

Comodo AEP

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

Xcitium

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

April 2025

Free Report: Automox vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.