

Automox and Qualys Patch Management compete in the patch management and vulnerability assessment category. Based on the comparison, Automox has the upper hand in ease of use and automation, while Qualys excels in vulnerability assessment and integration with security strategies.
Features: Automox offers cross-platform compatibility, intuitive interfaces, and automation capabilities. It supports Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for various environments. Worklet scripts and real-time asset management enhance flexibility and ease of use. Qualys Patch Management integrates vulnerability management tools, providing a risk-based approach and comprehensive evaluation of threats. It offers detailed reporting and prioritization of vulnerabilities, giving a solid foundation for security strategies.
Room for Improvement: Automox needs improvements in user access control and policy inheritance in multi-organization setups. Enhancing offline patching capabilities and reducing cloud dependency could benefit it. Qualys Patch Management could improve integration support and speed up patch verification. Enhancing dashboard customization and resolving agent communication for Linux systems are additional areas for refinement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Automox's cloud-native architecture facilitates quick and easy deployment, particularly for cloud environments, with strong customer support. Qualys Patch Management serves well across cloud environments but involves a more complex setup and needs improvements in customer service. Both are strong in deployment, though Automox offers superior ease of use and responsive support.
Pricing and ROI: Automox offers competitive pricing with clear ROI, emphasizing affordability and significant time savings through reduced manual efforts and enhanced security compliance. Users find it cost-effective. Alternatively, Qualys is more expensive, justified by its robust risk assessment and integration strengths. Although costly, many organizations find its depth in security insights valuable for the investment. Automox is noted for quick ROI, while Qualys provides extensive security management at a higher price.
It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.
Our team used to spend 10 hours per week just to update these things, and now we're doing it automatically.
With Qualys, we can save around 70 percent of time and between 30 to 40 percent of money.
We have a 50 percent return on investment due to reduced operational complexity and increased efficiency in patching and detection.
In the past, it took us seven to ten days to close critical patches, but now we manage to address them within forty-eight hours, while high-priority SLAs can often be resolved within seven days.
They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.
They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.
The customer support for Automox is very responsive and proactive.
The support team is experienced and responsive.
The support team is responsive and provides detailed information.
Whenever we raise a request and mention the priority of the ticket, they respond immediately via email or call.
It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.
Automox is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth.
It scales efficiently across different machines globally, ensuring patches are deployed smoothly.
Qualys Patch Management is a globally scalable product, easily handling increasing workloads and users.
If a client has purchased licensing for ten thousand assets and exceeds that, Qualys continues to scan those additional assets, which ensures the client's coverage.
It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.
I would rate the stability of Qualys Patch Management nine point five out of ten.
The stability of Qualys Patch Management is impeccable.
Overall, it is reliable.
An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.
I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking.
It could also leverage AI, which would help in autonomous patch prioritization and risk remediation.
There is a limitation where Qualys may not always offer solutions for remediation, particularly for end-of-life or end-of-service applications.
It would be better if Qualys Patch Management identifies whether the process has failed at the first instance and provides a retry button or retry mechanism, allowing retries for failed patches.
For critical options, they could make them red, green for medium, and blue for less significant options.
Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.
We get many more features at the same price as other solutions such as Microsoft SCCM.
However, it can be a bit expensive sometimes, and I think clients can be shocked when they see the price.
The pricing is reasonable and less expensive than the previous tool.
One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.
It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.
It has very strong patch automation, particularly in automated OS patching, third-party patching, policy-based rollout, patch scheduling, and vulnerability remediation.
We leverage this functionality to deploy scripts that adjust registry values, effectively patching vulnerabilities and enhancing the security of our machines.
We have been able to apply workarounds for zero-day vulnerabilities efficiently.
It provides insight into the organization's security posture and keeps databases updated with new CVEs.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Qualys Patch Management | 2.8% |
| Automox | 2.8% |
| Other | 94.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
Automox offers automated patch management with cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and ease of use. It provides real-time visibility and streamlines operations across Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it ideal for complex IT environments.
Automox empowers organizations with features like Worklets and remote management, enhancing security and efficiency through customizable patching policies, PowerShell script execution, and detailed reporting. It's primarily used for automated patch management, patch remediation, and compliance maintenance across diverse systems, ensuring cybersecurity and reducing vulnerabilities. Enhancements are desired for user access control, policy synchronization, and integration with tools like Tenable. Support for offline patching, rollback features, enhanced reporting, and notification customization are in demand. Improvements in cost effectiveness and multi-group policy applications are also suggested.
What are the key features of Automox?
What benefits and ROI can users expect when evaluating Automox?
In industry applications, Automox is widely used for managing and updating vast fleets of devices, particularly in sectors requiring stringent cybersecurity measures. It ensures seamless operations through its centralized automation and management capabilities, making it essential for organizations handling extensive IT networks.
Qualys Patch Management offers asset visibility, risk-based prioritization, and automation to enhance security. It integrates with VMDR for vulnerability prioritization, ensuring efficient patch deployment and reduced manual effort.
Qualys Patch Management focuses on automating patch deployment and bridging the gap between vulnerability identification and resolution. It supports Windows and Linux servers, providing real-time assessments and comprehensive reporting. The integration with VMDR prioritizes risks efficiently, promoting collaboration between IT and security teams. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows, improved vulnerability response times, and enhanced remote management.
What are the key features of Qualys Patch Management?
What benefits can organizations expect from Qualys Patch Management?
In industries like finance and healthcare, Qualys Patch Management is pivotal for maintaining stringent security standards. It helps organizations quickly address vulnerabilities, crucial in sectors that handle sensitive data. The ability to integrate with existing systems ensures minimal disruption and maximizes resource efficiency.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.