Automox vs Qualys Patch Management comparison

Automox and Qualys are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Automox is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while Qualys is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9. Automox holds a 2.2% mindshare in PM, compared to Qualys’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 20 Automox reviews

2,112 Views
908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys Patch Management

Read 49 Qualys Patch Management reviews

2,249 Views
2,249 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Automox

Qualys Patch Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Automox and Qualys Patch Management compete in the patch management category. While Automox is appreciated for its modern approach and affordability, Qualys is often deemed superior due to its comprehensive feature set, making it worth the investment.

Features: Automox offers real-time visibility, automated patch deployment, and cross-platform support. Users find its simplicity and speed beneficial. Qualys includes advanced vulnerability management, detailed reporting, and robust third-party patching capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Automox users mention the need for more detailed reporting and improved Linux patching. Further enhancements in interface and simplification of complex processes are suggested by Qualys users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Automox is noted for its quick and straightforward deployment with effective customer support. Qualys, although having a steeper learning curve during deployment, is balanced by its comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Automox is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and clear ROI, making it attractive, especially for smaller organizations. Qualys, while pricier, offers extensive features that justify the cost and deliver strong ROI for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Qualys Patch Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Qualys Patch Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.9

Automox enhances efficiency in patch management, saving time and resources, improving compliance, and offering better visibility and security.

Sentiment score

5.9

Qualys Patch Management boosts ROI by automating patches, saving time, reducing costs, and minimizing vulnerabilities with efficient resource use.

It is a cloud-based solution, so you do not need on-premises infrastructure, which saves hardware.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

Offered an additional remote solution, all while saving a lot of time and cost through troubleshooting.

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

With Qualys, we can save around 70 percent of time and between 30 to 40 percent of money.

Zafar Syed

Information Security Manager at BARC India

We have a 50 percent return on investment due to reduced operational complexity and increased efficiency in patching and detection.

Revathi VeeraRaghavan

Information Security - Manager at Infosys

This single source of truth has helped reduce costs for our organization by over seventy percent in return on investment.

Ie Ogbonnaya

Cybersecurity Consultant at CyberBackbone

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualys Patch Management report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.2

Automox’s customer service is highly praised for responsiveness, expertise, and efficiency, surpassing larger companies in user satisfaction.

Sentiment score

7.3

Qualys Patch Management offers responsive support with quick resolutions, though initial interaction challenges and frontline improvements are suggested.

They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.

Robert Araya

Network & Security Administrator at a legal firm with 51-200 employees

They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

The customer support has been excellent as the support team is always responsive and proactive.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

The support team is experienced and responsive.

Arshad Nr

Senior Security Consultant at CyberNxt Solutions LLP

The support team is responsive and provides detailed information.

GokulM

Vulnerability Management Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Whenever we raise a request and mention the priority of the ticket, they respond immediately via email or call.

Pallavi Jain

Security Consultant at Onity

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualys Patch Management report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

Automox is highly scalable and cloud-based, effectively managing numerous devices, despite minor manageability and console load time issues.

Sentiment score

8.3

Qualys Patch Management is scalable, efficiently handling large deployments with good cloud agent management but faces multi-tenancy and pricing challenges.

It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automox scalability is excellent because it caters to my organization needs and can handle our organizational needs, ensuring that all our devices are well patched.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

Automox's scalability is excellent as it has continued to grow with my organization and caters to my organization's needs.

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

It scales efficiently across different machines globally, ensuring patches are deployed smoothly.

reviewer2589096

Senior Information Security Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Qualys Patch Management is a globally scalable product, easily handling increasing workloads and users.

Zafar Syed

Information Security Manager at BARC India

If a client has purchased licensing for ten thousand assets and exceeds that, Qualys continues to scan those additional assets, which ensures the client's coverage.

Amber Mitchell

Lead Product Manager ASM at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualys Patch Management report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.1

Automox is praised for its stability, reliable performance, prompt incident response, and efficient patching, with minimal downtime.

Sentiment score

7.6

Qualys Patch Management is reliable and stable, though it occasionally faces minor issues and inconsistencies requiring support.

It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

I have not experienced any lagging or downtime

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

I can confirm that Automox is very stable.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

I would rate the stability of Qualys Patch Management nine point five out of ten.

reviewer2590236

Information Security Lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

The stability of Qualys Patch Management is impeccable.

Sandeep Pasi

Sr Cyber Security Manager at BARC India

Overall, it is reliable.

Karan Bhateja

System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualys Patch Management report

Room For Improvement

Automox needs better sync, user access, automation, UI, bandwidth management, notifications, reports, and remote support for Linux/iOS.

Qualys Patch Management needs better reporting, faster releases, improved UI, third-party integration, automation, and pricing adjustments.

Anything that can predict imminent failure of the device would be great.

PaulWalker2

Software Engineer at Unilever Inc.

An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

The integration is seamless.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

There is a limitation where Qualys may not always offer solutions for remediation, particularly for end-of-life or end-of-service applications.

Karan Bhateja

System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

It would be better if Qualys Patch Management identifies whether the process has failed at the first instance and provides a retry button or retry mechanism, allowing retries for failed patches.

AntonyLai

Sr Security Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

For critical options, they could make them red, green for medium, and blue for less significant options.

Arshad N. R.

Cyber Security Specialist at UBS Financial

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualys Patch Management report

Setup Cost

Automox offers cost-effective per-endpoint pricing, scalability, and comprehensive support with a valuable free trial for evaluation.

Qualys Patch Management is efficient and reasonably priced, but USD pricing may be costly for small environments.

Cost reduction has been noticeable, ranging from 50% to 40%, especially because we do not have to travel from one place to another to go on site and troubleshoot devices.

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

the price has always been competitive and very cost-effective

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

We get many more features at the same price as other solutions such as Microsoft SCCM.

Arshad Nr

Senior Security Consultant at CyberNxt Solutions LLP

However, it can be a bit expensive sometimes, and I think clients can be shocked when they see the price.

Amber Mitchell

Lead Product Manager ASM at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

The pricing is reasonable and less expensive than the previous tool.

Chaitanya Kajjam

Technical Lead - Security Operations at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualys Patch Management report

Valuable Features

Automox offers automated, cloud-native patching with cross-platform compatibility, customizable worklets, and an intuitive dashboard for simplified security management.

Qualys Patch Management enhances security with asset visibility, precise patch scheduling, integration, and automation, simplifying management and risk reduction.

One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automox allows me to patch all devices regardless of the operating system.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

We leverage this functionality to deploy scripts that adjust registry values, effectively patching vulnerabilities and enhancing the security of our machines.

reviewer2589096

Senior Information Security Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

We have been able to apply workarounds for zero-day vulnerabilities efficiently.

Arshad Nr

Senior Security Consultant at CyberNxt Solutions LLP

It provides insight into the organization's security posture and keeps databases updated with new CVEs.

Mubashir K

Cyber Security Engineer at Techensglobal

For more quotes and insights, download the Qualys Patch Management report

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Patch Management

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (36th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (13th)

Qualys Patch Management

Ranking in Patch Management

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 2.2%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys Patch Management is 3.3%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys Patch Management	3.3%
Automox	2.2%
Other	94.5%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Unified patching and remote access have strengthened security and reduced support overhead

Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believe that with some improvement, it could replace other tools that we currently use. Exclusion for updates should be improved in Automox. Integration with Tenable vulnerability management should be improved, as it should be included. I do not have any other improvements needed for Automox that I have not mentioned yet, perhaps only small or wish-list features.

Read full review

Arshad N. R.

Cyber Security Specialist at UBS Financial

Patch management process becomes more efficient and cost-effective while significantly improving vulnerability remediation rates

Regarding improvements in Qualys Patch Management, I did not quite understand the downsides they were expecting. Initially, I was confused about where to find and how to use the available features. It was challenging to identify the options we could employ and why we were using them. However, once I gained hands-on experience, I was able to identify the tool's particular features, making it easier for us to use it. The initial phase had some difficulty with the user interface. I would them to improve user training. They have used many colors, which can be confusing, so they should use specific colors for specific options. For critical options, they could make them red, green for medium, and blue for less significant options. This would make it easier for a beginner to recognize which buttons are dangerous to click. Such adjustments can help new users learn the solution faster.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Automox?

Automox needs some improvement, particularly in that remote support for Linux is lacking. Additionally, remote support for iOS could be better. The integration is seamless.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Our main use case for Automox is that we as a company need to be Cyber Security Plus compliant, and therefore we need to ensure that our devices are patched regularly. Having over 1,000 devices, ma...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Automox?

Automox is a modern, simple-to-use, and powerful tool that works well for all sizes of organizations that have a mix of remote, hybrid, and endpoints. Automated patching is a key strength of Automo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?

Qualys reduces risk for us and our clients by upwards of 50% when we arrive at a client site with no previous software installed. If they have other software they were using and then transition to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?

In my opinion, there are areas within Qualys Patch Management that have room for improvement, such as cloud instance functionality. If mobile alerts could come through other social media platforms ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?

The purpose of using Qualys Patch Management in my organization is to ensure that our systems are always up to date and to protect against vulnerabilities from attackers. Before we started using th...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Automox

Compared 5% of the time

More Automox Competitors

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 12% of the time

Patch My PC vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 12% of the time

BigFix vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 11% of the time

Vicarius vRx vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Qualys Patch Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

March 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Patch Management

March 2026

Download Qualys Patch Management product report

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Qualys Patch Management optimizes patching and vulnerability remediation through automation and intelligence insights, accelerating the process by 43% and improving patch rates by 90%. Its integration with CMDB and ITSM tools speeds up ticket closures by 60%, effectively reducing the attack surface while freeing IT and security resources. This cloud-based solution bridges the IT-security gap, making it essential for cybersecurity.

Qualys

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Qualys Patch Management

March 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Qualys Patch Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Qualys Patch Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Qualys Patch Management report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.